search for: dishonestly

Sorry, I certainly didn't mean to be dishonest. I was just repeating one of the comparisons given by the research paper. Regardless, even setjmp() uses a structure of 148 bytes in size (on my machine). The main point is that with compiler support, many context switches can be easily reduced to just a few instructions and only 8 byte of memory, and even in the worst case they will outperform

On 12/20/2015 12:16 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/20/2015 4:26 AM, Ned Slider wrote: >> Unless I'm mistaken RPM in el5 does not support the https protocol. > > did you mean Yum ? rpm is just a file format for packages, and a > package installer program, its yum that does the network operations to > fetch the packages, and as far as I understand it uses libcurl, so it

The first time you said “setjmp/longjmp intrinsics” I thought it was a typo, and that you were talking about the C standard library functions. If you’re actually talking about LLVM intrinsics, are they documented? I don’t see any intrinsics with those names in the language reference (https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html <https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html>). > On Mar 27, 2020, at 3:30 PM,

On 2023-07-20 04:36, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > > my predict is that they will continue as a #rebuilder / #freeloader, > writing software is a hard work. > #offensive terms to the community :-), hide hat wrote it. No, they didn't. That term was bandied about on social media by people who were speculating about the reasoning behind discontinuing the practice of debranding

Hi LLVM devs, I’d like to describe my problem, and then propose new features of LLVM which would solve it efficiently. I'm building a new statically-compiled programming language, and I plan on using LLVM as the backend. The language will have a runtime with cooperatively managed green threads (user-space "mini-threads", each with their own dynamically allocated stack). A single OS

Dear Rails community, As part of a programming languages/security research group at the University of Maryland, we are building some static analysis tools for Rails applications. These tools work by taking formally specified properties of interest, and then analyzing code to verify that those properties indeed hold. Using these tools, we found some security vulnerabilities in Rails, and we would

As far as I can see, here is a summary of the situation, and there's a point to this, but I only make it in step (4), needing the first three steps to set up a background to keep my own thoughts clear: 1) Fedora (via Jakub) shows it's possible to patch OpenSSH. 2) OpenVPN (via gert) shows it's possible to build a 'shim' of sorts that allows code to work with libreSSL and

I subscribe (pay) for a lot of things personally. Music, Movies, Anti Virus, VPN, Storage, etc. But for my business, I do not want to pay Red Hat, Zimbra, or Google Workspace. Why ? Because the general rule seems to be Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely 'unaffordable' service. Because being a

On Sun, 2015-12-20 at 12:44 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > RPM has ability to install a package over the network. > > rpm -i ftp://example.org/foo-2.2.noarch.rpm Thanks for the new knowledge. > The point I'm trying to make though is that yum could benefit from > the ability to verify the fingerprint in a key it is importing > matches a DNS query for the user and domain

Hello, I see the new Xen packages now really in Sid and even in Lenny on packages.debian.org: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=linux-image+xen+amd64&searchon=names&suite=testing&section=all http://packages.debian.org/lenny/xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 Does this mean there is now official Xen amb64 and dom0 support in Lenny? I am running it now for a while without

> I can't predict the future but my feeling is that AlmaLinux has a good > chance to become the second Gold standard. I disagree with you. Both Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux are in a very comfortable position, and they will likely stay that way. my predict is that they will continue as a #rebuilder / #freeloader, writing software is a hard work. SuSe hardfork will probably be only an

Dear Guru''s, I''ld like to request you to vote here http://launchpad.enterprise2conf.com/node/74 as 5 star (please click on 5 star to vote), this will give oxygen to our project. Waiting for your valuable vote. Best Regards, Pavan Agrawal

Hi, As stated on the Dovecot documentation, at rest encryption is possible [1]. However, these keys are present on the system itself and are unprotected. Therefore, if a system is compromised, the attacker has access to the encrypted mail and the keys. There is no security benefit in that situation, except for hoping that the attacker doesn't understand that this is happening and how.

I guess you've all read it already, but here it goes: "All video codecs are covered by patents. A patent pool is being assembled to go after Theora and other ?open source? codecs now. Unfortunately, just because something is open source, it doesn?t mean or guarantee that it doesn?t infringe on others patents. An open standard is different from being royalty free or open source. Sent

On 20/12/15 10:28, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/19/2015 09:49 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >> With third party repositories the key and configuration file is often >> distributed separately. That's the potential attack vector for trojan >> keys. > > Examples? > > All of the notable repositories that I'm aware of publish an > x-release.rpm that

...g, I am not aware of many programs that do that without > very specific user selection. Any user savvy enough to turn on dithering > would hopefully be paying attention well enough to avoid promoting 16-bit to > 24-bit without noticing their mistake. I suspect that this is sometimes done dishonestly in order to sell hi-fi enthusiasts DVD-A's made from lower-quality source material. After all, they do sell $35 dollar "high definition" digital coaxial S/PDIF cables at your local Radio Shack. And you lost me on the last paragraph there, but that's okay. Thanks for the clarifica...

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:54:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:51:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017?11?29? 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > > > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net > > > > to ease configuration of a

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:54:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:51:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017?11?29? 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > > > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net > > > > to ease configuration of a

We are using a platform from AmarFone Inc. It great full featured , everything you want to run a calling card and does not cost your a lot of money. Their support is awesome. You can contact them at sales@amarfone.com. Ehsanul Karim

On Jul 28, 2017, at 11:56 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:13:42PM +0200, hw wrote: >>> What?s the point of doing this with Fedora? It?s not like bugs >>> were fixed before Fedora is EOL and all reports are forgotten. >> >> Many bugs are fixed in Fedora. Many more bugs are fixed in the >>