Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "discussion_r1592317940".
2024 May 07
1
Question about "HB" flag and a "battery.charge.high" name
Hello all,
During discussion at
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2430#discussion_r1592317940 I
found that while `nut-names.txt` documents the `battery.charge.low` as the
"Remaining battery level when UPS switches to LB (percent)", there is no
counterpart as `battery.charge.high`. First I thought one could be just
added... but for that matter, what could one logically mean - an ov...
2024 May 07
1
Question about "HB" flag and a "battery.charge.high" name
Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes:
> During discussion at
> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2430#discussion_r1592317940 I
> found that while `nut-names.txt` documents the `battery.charge.low` as the
> "Remaining battery level when UPS switches to LB (percent)", there is no
> counterpart as `battery.charge.high`. First I thought one could be just
> added... but for that matter, what could one lo...
2024 May 10
1
Question about "HB" flag and a "battery.charge.high" name
...ov
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:46?PM Greg Troxel via Nut-upsdev <
nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
> Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes:
>
> > During discussion at
> > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2430#discussion_r1592317940
> I
> > found that while `nut-names.txt` documents the `battery.charge.low` as
> the
> > "Remaining battery level when UPS switches to LB (percent)", there is no
> > counterpart as `battery.charge.high`. First I thought one could be just
> > added... but for...