Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "discog".
Did you mean:
disco
2013 Mar 12
1
Flac compression levels?
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:36:29PM +0100, catch-all at masklinn.net wrote:
>
> > now is it just a coincidence,
>
> It is, testing on a >6mn piece (Endless, Nameless from Nirvana's
> Nevermind, 6:21)
Does that track have a long period of silence in the middle?
(...checks Discogs...)
Nope: "Endless, Nameless" comes after 10 minutes silence after the end
of "Something In The Way", and all are indexed on the CD as track 12.
I'm just mentioning this because I'm pretty sure that FLAC doesn't
compress as tightly as it could when the source file...
2013 Mar 12
3
Flac compression levels?
"Using FLAC binary : /Users/Marcus/flac/test/../src/flac/flac
Original file size 441044 bytes.
Compression level 1, file size 421393 bytes.
Compression level 2, file size 421393 bytes.
Compression level 3, file size 373613 bytes.
Compression level 4, file size 369517 bytes.
Compression level 5, file size 369517 bytes.
Compression level 6, file size 369517 bytes.
Compression
2011 Jan 10
5
FLAC is dead?
>> Oh I don't doubt the basics, red book is red book and bits are
>> identically replicable and re rippable bits.
>
> I don't see any problem with taking innovation as far as is practical
> and saying "it's finished, no more updates".
Sure, basics :) Again, I'm meaning in regard to about bugs, docs,
porting and nits.
> If I want to do freedb