search for: discernimento

...ll llvm-as: std_lang.ll:72:5: error: instruction expected to be numbered '%4' %2 = load i32* %ret ; <i32> int ^ Why %4 ??? what I did wrong? -- Judison judison at gmail.com "O ignorante que procura se instruir é como um sábio; o sábio que fala sem discernimento se assemelha a um ignorante." Imam Ali (as) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110311/c97db470/attachment.html>

...;s also no limit on the number of loads > and stores you can do without disturbing the optimization; just > don't do anything too opaque with the address. > > John. -- Judison judison at gmail.com "O ignorante que procura se instruir é como um sábio; o sábio que fala sem discernimento se assemelha a um ignorante." Imam Ali (as) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110314/8497cd56/attachment.html>

On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:56 PM, John Criswell wrote: > On 3/14/11 7:52 PM, Judison wrote: >> >> 2) does the LLVM optimizes this: >> >> ; this code (arg -> var) is very similar to what gcc generates >> define void @foo(i32 %arg0) { >> entry: >> %var0 = alloca i32 >> store i32 %arg0, i32* var0 >> ... >> %x = load i32*

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Judison <judison at gmail.com> wrote: > I hope this is the right place to ask it, sorry if I'm wrong... It's the right place, though the IRC channel would have been good too. > My compiler is generating this code: > > (line numbers included) (Please ignore the extra br label %b0 and the whole > b0) Sorry, but the extra branches