search for: disastrously

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3660 Bug ID: 3660 Summary: Prevent disastrous unintended local copying Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: scp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi all, I''ve noticed, that once using storeconfig, if the db (in my case mysql) is down than puppet wont start... is there a real reason for making puppet depend on the db? Thanks, Ohad _______________________________________________ Puppet-users mailing list Puppet-users@madstop.com https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users

Hi all, I am trying to perform some analysis on the residuals of pair-wise linear regressions between two large sets A with dimensions {k x m}, and B {k x n} . So I need to regress every column B[,j] of B on every column A[,i] of A and produce a matrix C with dimensions {m x n}, so that C[i,j] contains the z-score of the k-th (last) residual of the aforementioned linear regression. I have tried

> On Jan 9, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Kaylor, Andrew via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I think we’re going to need to create a new mechanism to communicate strict FP modes to the backend. I think we need to avoid doing anything that will require re-inventing or duplicating all of the pattern matching that goes on in instruction selection (which is the reason we’re

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:31:05AM -0700, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > When adding a VMCI resource, the check for an existing entry > would ignore that the new entry could be a wildcard. This could > result in multiple resource entries that would match a given > handle. One disastrous outcome of this is that the > refcounting used to ensure that delayed callbacks for VMCI > datagrams

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:31:05AM -0700, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > When adding a VMCI resource, the check for an existing entry > would ignore that the new entry could be a wildcard. This could > result in multiple resource entries that would match a given > handle. One disastrous outcome of this is that the > refcounting used to ensure that delayed callbacks for VMCI > datagrams

Hi, I''ve just had my very first attempt of making a JavaScript class, "prototype" style, so please bare with me, for any disastrous errors :-) Anyway, I''ve made this class, which is called on an input field on focus: http://pastebin.com/487417 It works fine in FireFox, but causes some problems in IE. My question is regarding line 69 in the paste. What is

Is there a way in R (12.x) to avoid the implicit coercion of factors to integers in the context of subscripts? If this is not possible, is there a way to get at least a warning, if any coercion of this type happens, given that the action of this coercion is almost never what is wanted? Of course, in the rare case that as.integer() is applied explicitly onto a factor, the warning is not needed,

>The standard argument against trying to introduce "scope-like" mechanisms to LLVM IR is inlining; >unless you're going to prevent functions that use stricter/laxer FP rules from being inlined >into >each other (which sounds disastrous), you're going to need to communicate strictness on an >instruction-by-instruction basis. If the backend wants to handle that by

Der useRs, I'm working on meta analysis using rmeta package. Using code below I plot the forest plot: library(rmeta) data (catheter) a<-meta.MH (n.trt, n.ctrl, col.trt, col.ctrl, data=catheter, names=Name, subset=c(13,6,5,3,7,12,4,11,1,8,10,2)) summary(a) # odds ratio values and confidence intervals metaplot(a$logOR, a$selogOR, nn=a$selogOR^-2,a$names, summn=a$logMH, sumse=a$selogMH,

Hi, I've tried to upgrade my asterisk to 1.2.3 again after disastrous bug incident yesterday but when I called and the phone was picked up, there was simply busy tone... Weird, is this another bug in asterisk 1.2.3? Currently, I rollback again to asterisk 1.0.10...:( Is there any configuration change issue in 1.2.3 cause I've just used my configuration that worked in asterisk1.2.2 ?

I dunno if this ours, or an upstream enhancement, but I was just rebuilding a 6.5 box with 7. I selected custom formatting. 1. It seems to autoselect *ALL* drives. I would strongly argue that it should *only* select the first drive, or whichever is already bootable. That could be disastrous if someone doesn't notice they're all selected. 2. There's NO BACK BUTTON once you get into the

Full_Name: Marek Ancukiewicz Version: 0.64.0 OS: Linux (RedHat 6.0) Submission from: (NULL) (132.183.12.87) I've noticed that factor structures get recoded when the data is dumped using either dump or dput and then restored with source or dget. This occurs when the values taken by factors do not include 1. For example: a <-

On 9 Jan 2018 22:55, "John McCall via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: On Jan 9, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote: >The standard argument against trying to introduce "scope-like" mechanisms to LLVM IR is inlining; >unless you're going to prevent functions that use stricter/laxer FP rules from being inlined

If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20 5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2.. samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs. Gr. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: dave at anchor-tech.co.uk >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens David Nolan >Verzonden: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 14:12 >Aan: 'Mauricio Tavares' >CC:

Hi, Last night I attempted to upgrade from Samba 4.8.5 to 4.9.0, with disastrous results. Upon starting Samba 4.9.0 my entire network came to a screaming halt a few seconds later, and upon shutting Samba down it came back to life again. Just to be sure this wasn't a coincidence, I then started Samba again. Once again all connectivity stopped, but came back as soon as I was able to shut

"Rotem, Nadav" <nadav.rotem at intel.com> writes: > One of the arguments for packing masks is that it reduces > vector-registers pressure. Auto-vectorizing compilers maintain > multiple masks for different execution paths (for each loop nesting, > etc). Saving masks in xmm registers may result in vector-register > pressure which will cause spilling of these

!!! DON'T TRY THE CODE IN THIS EMAIL AT HOME !!! Well, unlink() does what it is supposed to do, so you could argue that there is nothing wrong with it. Also, nobody would call unlink() on "~", right? The situation is not so simple, however. E.g. if you happen to have a directory called "~", and you iterate over all files and directories to selectively remove some of them,

> On Jun 18, 2016, at 9:16 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:32 AM, Richard Smith via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> I think that this is the right approach, and we happen to have a natural forcing function here: opaque pointer types. I think we should

We are about to abandon GlusterFS as a solution for our object storage needs. I'm hoping to get some feedback to tell me whether we have missed something and are making the wrong decision. We're already a year into this project after evaluating a number of solutions. I'd like not to abandon GlusterFS if we just misunderstand how it works. Our use case is fairly straight forward.