Displaying 20 results from an estimated 136 matches for "disastrously".
2024 Jan 26
3
[Bug 3660] New: Prevent disastrous unintended local copying
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3660
Bug ID: 3660
Summary: Prevent disastrous unintended local copying
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 9.6p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: scp
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2008 Feb 13
7
dependency to storeconfig
Hi all,
I''ve noticed, that once using storeconfig, if the db (in my case mysql) is
down than puppet wont start...
is there a real reason for making puppet depend on the db?
Thanks,
Ohad
_______________________________________________
Puppet-users mailing list
Puppet-users@madstop.com
https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users
2012 Apr 03
2
pairwise linear regression between two large datasets
Hi all,
I am trying to perform some analysis on the residuals of pair-wise linear
regressions between two large sets A with dimensions {k x m}, and B {k x n}
. So I need to regress every column B[,j] of B on every column A[,i] of A
and produce a matrix C with dimensions {m x n}, so that C[i,j] contains the
z-score of the k-th (last) residual of the aforementioned linear regression.
I have tried
2018 Jan 09
4
[cfe-dev] Why is #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not supported?
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Kaylor, Andrew via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I think we’re going to need to create a new mechanism to communicate strict FP modes to the backend. I think we need to avoid doing anything that will require re-inventing or duplicating all of the pattern matching that goes on in instruction selection (which is the reason we’re
2018 Oct 02
2
[PATCH] VMCI: Resource wildcard match fixed
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:31:05AM -0700, Jorgen Hansen wrote:
> When adding a VMCI resource, the check for an existing entry
> would ignore that the new entry could be a wildcard. This could
> result in multiple resource entries that would match a given
> handle. One disastrous outcome of this is that the
> refcounting used to ensure that delayed callbacks for VMCI
> datagrams
2018 Oct 02
2
[PATCH] VMCI: Resource wildcard match fixed
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:31:05AM -0700, Jorgen Hansen wrote:
> When adding a VMCI resource, the check for an existing entry
> would ignore that the new entry could be a wildcard. This could
> result in multiple resource entries that would match a given
> handle. One disastrous outcome of this is that the
> refcounting used to ensure that delayed callbacks for VMCI
> datagrams
2006 Jan 02
2
First time class problems
Hi,
I''ve just had my very first attempt of making a JavaScript class,
"prototype" style, so please bare with me, for any disastrous errors :-)
Anyway, I''ve made this class, which is called on an input field on focus:
http://pastebin.com/487417
It works fine in FireFox, but causes some problems in IE. My question is
regarding line 69 in the paste. What is
2011 Feb 14
2
How to get warning about implicit factor to integer coercion?
Is there a way in R (12.x) to avoid the implicit coercion of factors to integers
in the context of subscripts?
If this is not possible, is there a way to get at least a warning, if any
coercion of this type happens, given that the action of this coercion is almost
never what is wanted?
Of course, in the rare case that as.integer() is applied explicitly onto a
factor, the warning is not needed,
2018 Jan 09
0
[cfe-dev] Why is #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not supported?
>The standard argument against trying to introduce "scope-like" mechanisms to LLVM IR is inlining;
>unless you're going to prevent functions that use stricter/laxer FP rules from being inlined >into
>each other (which sounds disastrous), you're going to need to communicate strictness on an
>instruction-by-instruction basis. If the backend wants to handle that by
2006 Apr 24
1
rmeta: forest plot problem
Der useRs,
I'm working on meta analysis using rmeta package. Using code below I
plot the forest plot:
library(rmeta)
data (catheter)
a<-meta.MH (n.trt, n.ctrl, col.trt, col.ctrl, data=catheter, names=Name,
subset=c(13,6,5,3,7,12,4,11,1,8,10,2))
summary(a) # odds ratio values and confidence intervals
metaplot(a$logOR, a$selogOR, nn=a$selogOR^-2,a$names, summn=a$logMH,
sumse=a$selogMH,
2006 Jan 25
1
asterisk 1.2.3 call problem
Hi,
I've tried to upgrade my asterisk to 1.2.3 again after disastrous bug
incident yesterday but when I called and the phone was picked up, there
was simply busy tone...
Weird, is this another bug in asterisk 1.2.3?
Currently, I rollback again to asterisk 1.0.10...:(
Is there any configuration change issue in 1.2.3 cause I've just used my
configuration that worked in asterisk1.2.2 ?
2014 Sep 22
1
CentOS 7 installer
I dunno if this ours, or an upstream enhancement, but I was just
rebuilding a 6.5 box with 7. I selected custom formatting.
1. It seems to autoselect *ALL* drives. I would strongly argue that it
should *only* select the first drive, or whichever is already bootable.
That could be disastrous if someone doesn't notice they're all selected.
2. There's NO BACK BUTTON once you get into the
1999 May 27
1
Factor structures not preserved after dump/dput (PR#200)
Full_Name: Marek Ancukiewicz
Version: 0.64.0
OS: Linux (RedHat 6.0)
Submission from: (NULL) (132.183.12.87)
I've noticed that factor structures get recoded when the data is dumped
using either dump or dput and then restored with source or dget. This
occurs when the values taken by factors do not include 1. For example:
a <-
2018 Jan 10
0
[cfe-dev] Why is #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not supported?
On 9 Jan 2018 22:55, "John McCall via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
wrote:
On Jan 9, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote:
>The standard argument against trying to introduce "scope-like" mechanisms
to LLVM IR is inlining;
>unless you're going to prevent functions that use stricter/laxer FP rules
from being inlined
2015 May 22
3
SCO OpenServer
If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20
5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2..
samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs.
Gr.
Louis
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: dave at anchor-tech.co.uk
>[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens David Nolan
>Verzonden: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 14:12
>Aan: 'Mauricio Tavares'
>CC:
2018 Sep 15
6
Network Meltdown after Samba 4.9.0 Upgrade
Hi,
Last night I attempted to upgrade from Samba 4.8.5 to 4.9.0, with
disastrous results. Upon starting Samba 4.9.0 my entire network came to
a screaming halt a few seconds later, and upon shutting Samba down it
came back to life again.
Just to be sure this wasn't a coincidence, I then started Samba again.
Once again all connectivity stopped, but came back as soon as I was able
to shut
2011 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] Vector select/compare support in LLVM
"Rotem, Nadav" <nadav.rotem at intel.com> writes:
> One of the arguments for packing masks is that it reduces
> vector-registers pressure. Auto-vectorizing compilers maintain
> multiple masks for different execution paths (for each loop nesting,
> etc). Saving masks in xmm registers may result in vector-register
> pressure which will cause spilling of these
2020 Feb 26
3
unlink() on "~" removes the home directory
!!! DON'T TRY THE CODE IN THIS EMAIL AT HOME !!!
Well, unlink() does what it is supposed to do, so you could argue that
there is nothing wrong with it. Also, nobody would call unlink() on
"~", right?
The situation is not so simple, however. E.g. if you happen to have a
directory called "~", and you iterate over all files and directories
to selectively remove some of them,
2016 Jun 19
2
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
> On Jun 18, 2016, at 9:16 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:32 AM, Richard Smith via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> I think that this is the right approach, and we happen to have a natural forcing function here: opaque pointer types. I think we should
2013 Dec 12
3
Is Gluster the wrong solution for us?
We are about to abandon GlusterFS as a solution for our object storage needs. I'm hoping to get some feedback to tell me whether we have missed something and are making the wrong decision. We're already a year into this project after evaluating a number of solutions. I'd like not to abandon GlusterFS if we just misunderstand how it works.
Our use case is fairly straight forward.