search for: disastrous

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3660 Bug ID: 3660 Summary: Prevent disastrous unintended local copying Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: scp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org...

Hi all, I''ve noticed, that once using storeconfig, if the db (in my case mysql) is down than puppet wont start... is there a real reason for making puppet depend on the db? Thanks, Ohad _______________________________________________ Puppet-users mailing list Puppet-users@madstop.com https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users

...] of B on every column A[,i] of A and produce a matrix C with dimensions {m x n}, so that C[i,j] contains the z-score of the k-th (last) residual of the aforementioned linear regression. I have tried the following code, but i don't seem to get it work. Moreover, any idea of using a for loop is disastrous since A and B are very large matrices. I'd be grateful for any suggestions! C <- apply( A[ ,1:dim(A)[2] ], 2, linRegZscore, y=A[ ,1:dim(A)[2]] ) where linRegZscore is the following function linRegUtility1 <- function(x,y){ regRes <- lm(y~x)$residuals ( regRes[dim(regRes)[1]]-apply...

...we should probably believe that someone will eventually do it. The standard argument against trying to introduce "scope-like" mechanisms to LLVM IR is inlining; unless you're going to prevent functions that use stricter/laxer FP rules from being inlined into each other (which sounds disastrous), you're going to need to communicate strictness on an instruction-by-instruction basis. If the backend wants to handle that by using the strictest rule that it sees in use anywhere in the function because pattern-matching is otherwise too error-prone, ok, that's its right; but the IR real...

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:31:05AM -0700, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > When adding a VMCI resource, the check for an existing entry > would ignore that the new entry could be a wildcard. This could > result in multiple resource entries that would match a given > handle. One disastrous outcome of this is that the > refcounting used to ensure that delayed callbacks for VMCI > datagrams have run before the datagram is destroyed can be > wrong, since the refcount could be increased on the duplicate > entry. This in turn leads to a use after free bug. This issue > was...

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:31:05AM -0700, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > When adding a VMCI resource, the check for an existing entry > would ignore that the new entry could be a wildcard. This could > result in multiple resource entries that would match a given > handle. One disastrous outcome of this is that the > refcounting used to ensure that delayed callbacks for VMCI > datagrams have run before the datagram is destroyed can be > wrong, since the refcount could be increased on the duplicate > entry. This in turn leads to a use after free bug. This issue > was...

Hi, I''ve just had my very first attempt of making a JavaScript class, "prototype" style, so please bare with me, for any disastrous errors :-) Anyway, I''ve made this class, which is called on an input field on focus: http://pastebin.com/487417 It works fine in FireFox, but causes some problems in IE. My question is regarding line 69 in the paste. What is the right way of "re-attaching" the event to t...

...is not possible, is there a way to get at least a warning, if any coercion of this type happens, given that the action of this coercion is almost never what is wanted? Of course, in the rare case that as.integer() is applied explicitly onto a factor, the warning is not needed, but certainly not as disastrous as in the other case. Probably, in a future version of R, an option similar to that for partial matches of subscripts might be useful to change the default from maximal unsafety to safe use.

>The standard argument against trying to introduce "scope-like" mechanisms to LLVM IR is inlining; >unless you're going to prevent functions that use stricter/laxer FP rules from being inlined >into >each other (which sounds disastrous), you're going to need to communicate strictness on an >instruction-by-instruction basis. If the backend wants to handle that by using the strictest >rule that it sees in use anywhere in the function because pattern-matching is otherwise too >error-prone, ok, that's its right; but...

...selogMH, sumnn=a$selogMH^-2, logeffect=TRUE) Now I would like to add numerical odds ratio values and corresponding confidence intervals for each study on the second y axis (eg. http://www.statsdirect.com/help/meta_analysis/cochrane_plot.htm. I try with 'text' command, but the outcome is disastrous. If anyone can explain the best way to solve my problem, I should be very grateful. Andrej

Hi, I've tried to upgrade my asterisk to 1.2.3 again after disastrous bug incident yesterday but when I called and the phone was picked up, there was simply busy tone... Weird, is this another bug in asterisk 1.2.3? Currently, I rollback again to asterisk 1.0.10...:( Is there any configuration change issue in 1.2.3 cause I've just used my configuration that...

I dunno if this ours, or an upstream enhancement, but I was just rebuilding a 6.5 box with 7. I selected custom formatting. 1. It seems to autoselect *ALL* drives. I would strongly argue that it should *only* select the first drive, or whichever is already bootable. That could be disastrous if someone doesn't notice they're all selected. 2. There's NO BACK BUTTON once you get into the select mount points, etc, screen. The only way back seems to be a reboot. mark

...t(b,'b.data') new.b <- dget('b.data') Then b is not the same as new.b: > b [1] c d e Levels: a b c d e > new.b [1] a b c Levels: a b c d e This seems to be a very serious bug. It can make one to mislabel treatments: a very emabarassing (and potentially disastrous) mistake. The reason for this bug seems to lie in a way in which structure() treats factor structures. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help&quot...

...ndrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote: >The standard argument against trying to introduce "scope-like" mechanisms to LLVM IR is inlining; >unless you're going to prevent functions that use stricter/laxer FP rules from being inlined >into >each other (which sounds disastrous), you're going to need to communicate strictness on an >instruction-by-instruction basis. If the backend wants to handle that by using the strictest >rule that it sees in use anywhere in the function because pattern-matching is otherwise too >error-prone, ok, that's its right; but...

If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20 5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2.. samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs. Gr. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: dave at anchor-tech.co.uk >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens David Nolan >Verzonden: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 14:12 >Aan: 'Mauricio Tavares' >CC:

Hi, Last night I attempted to upgrade from Samba 4.8.5 to 4.9.0, with disastrous results. Upon starting Samba 4.9.0 my entire network came to a screaming halt a few seconds later, and upon shutting Samba down it came back to life again. Just to be sure this wasn't a coincidence, I then started Samba again. Once again all connectivity stopped, but came back as soon as I...

...ector-register > pressure which will cause spilling of these registers. I agree with > you that GP registers are also a precious resource. GPRs are more precious than vector registers in my experience. Spilling a vector register isn't that painful. Spilling a GPR holding an address is disastrous. > In my private branch, I added the [v4i1 .. v64i1] types. I also > implemented a new type of target lowering: "PACK". This lowering packs Is PACK in the X86 namespace? It seems a pretty target-specific thing. > I also plan to experiment with promoting <4 x i1> to <...

...directory. But preventing unlink() from deleting "~" does not actually seem too hard. If unlink() could just refuse removing "~" (when expand = TRUE), that would be great. It seems to me that the current behavior is very-very rarely intended, and its consequences are potentially disastrous. If unlink("~", recursive = TRUE) errors, you can still remove a local "~" file/dir with unlink("./~", ...). And you can still remove your home directory if you really want to do that, with unlink(path.expand("~"), ...). So no functionality is lost. Also, i...

...pic of the pointer changes proposed, I really don’t think the community is served by waiting for that. The supposition seems to be that we’d land it *without* upgrade support, but then bump the major version number to indicate this. If that’s the proposal, I think that doing such a thing would be disastrous for the LLVM community as a whole: we need to have at least some sliding window of support for older formats. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160618/8f324335/attachment.html>

...fline, but they did and we have verified in our test environment that this is sufficient to cause the corruption problem. The good news is that we think both of these problems got fixed in 3.4.1. So why are we leaving? In trying to figure out what was going on with our GlusterFS system after the disastrous rebalance, we ran across two posts. The first one was http://hekafs.org/index.php/2012/03/glusterfs-algorithms-distribution/. If we understand it correctly, anytime you add new storage servers to your cluster, you have to do a rebalance and that rebalance will require a minimum of 50% of the data...