search for: disasmed

Hi Jun, I'm not sure how to fix this yet, but this looks incorrectly defined in lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td: def MOV32o32a : Ii32 <0xA1, RawFrm, (outs), (ins offset32:$src), "mov{l}\t{$src, %eax|eax, $src}", [], IIC_MOV_MEM>, Requires<[In32BitMode]>; This instruction can be REX-prefixed for a 64-bit move, and that also

Hi, With objdump, i have this (Intel syntax) 64 a1 00 00 00 00 mov eax,fs:0x0 However, if I pass above string to llvm-mc, I would have: $ echo "0x64 0xa1 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00"|./Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-mc -disassemble -arch=x86 --output-asm-variant=1 .text mov eax, dword ptr [0] You can see a big difference. This is on the latest code. Any idea how to

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Kay Tiong Khoo <kkhoo at perfwizard.com>wrote: > Hi Jun, > > I'm not sure how to fix this yet, but this looks incorrectly defined in > lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td: > > def MOV32o32a : Ii32 <0xA1, RawFrm, (outs), (ins offset32:$src), > "mov{l}\t{$src, %eax|eax, $src}", [], IIC_MOV_MEM>, >

> I would file a bugzilla in the x86 component and cc Craig Topper, the x86 > disasm/codegen expert. If you chase down the revision history, there are already a couple of bugs filed: PR16961 and PR16962. Cheers. Tim.

On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 22:59 -0800, Craig Topper wrote: > I started trying to fix this tonight but it's pretty nasty to fix. > I'll try to make another go at it later this week. Much of it seems fixed already; what's left to fix? The segment prefix override? Does that mean we get to fix disassembly of '0x65 0xa4' while we're at it? (Although we can't even

Thanks, Tim! As Craig noted: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16962#c1 "There are many things wrong with these instructions." :) On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>wrote: > > I would file a bugzilla in the x86 component and cc Craig Topper, the x86 > > disasm/codegen expert. > > If you chase down the revision

hi, i found this code in X86DisassemblerDecoder.h #define EA_BASES_32BIT \ ENTRY(EAX) \ ENTRY(ECX) \ ENTRY(EDX) \ ENTRY(EBX) \ ENTRY(sib) \ ENTRY(EBP) \ ENTRY(ESI) \ ENTRY(EDI) \ ENTRY(R8D) \ ENTRY(R9D) \ ENTRY(R10D) \ ENTRY(R11D) \

> As Craig noted: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16962#c1 > > "There are many things wrong with these instructions." I think he fixed quite a few of them shortly afterwards (r189201), though obviously not all, as you discovered. Cheers. Tim.

I believe I have now fixed the 0x64 0xa1 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 bug in r199364. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>wrote: > To fix it we need to change offset8/offset16/etc to have two suboperands > and update the printer to understand that. Also update the disassembler to > add the segment to the MCInst when its creating it. When I did these

Hi, I have been trying to use LLVM as a disassembler, thus providing a small part of my decompiler that I am working on. It currently decompiles from X86_64 binary.o -> LLVM IR. It works with a small set of test programs so far, so cannot currently handle large binary programs yet. The problem is with the LLVM "getInstruction()" method. It used to have a PC (program counter)

Thanks, Luke, for having a look to it. Sure, I can give you some reproducible example -- even in two degrees of completeness ;-): see below. Thanks again, Peter %----------------------------------- (I) first example %----------------------------------- Just to reproduce the error, on r-devel, try: install.packages("RobAStRDA") require(RobAStRDA) getFromNamespace(".RMXE", ns

I can't reproduce the more complex version. But the package on CRAN fails in the same way on 3.2.3 and 3.3.0. The problem is that your sysdata.rda includes a function that is generating this error. If you do f <- getFromNamespace(".RMXE", ns ="RobAStRDA")[["GEVFamily"]][["fun.N"]][[1]] g <- get("fct", environment(f)) and look at the

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Songmao <smtian at ingenic.cn> wrote: > Michael, >    I have rework the patch according to your suggestion.  And I have read > binutil/objdump source code and found that it has a logic that if there's no > symtab, it will use dynsym, which is missing in llvm-objdump. > > Songmao > @@ -747,12 +747,28 @@ error_code

Michael, I have rework the patch according to your suggestion. And I have read binutil/objdump source code and found that it has a logic that if there's no symtab, it will use dynsym, which is missing in llvm-objdump. Songmao -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0002-Fix-the-address-calculation-for-llvm-objdump.patch Type: text/x-patch

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Jun, > > On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:14 AM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to assemble below instruction with latest LLVM code, but > fail. Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? > > > > > > $ echo "vaddps zmm7

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 25, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jun, >> >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:14 AM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: >>

Hello, I have been collaborating with a project I would like to propose for inclusion in the list of software built with LLVM. The project is a disassembly framework named Capstone (https://github.com/aquynh/capstone). Here is a description: --- snip --- Capstone is a lightweight multi-platform, multi-architecture disassembly framework. Our target is to make Capstone the ultimate disassembly

--- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c b/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c index e7beb26..381e396 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c @@ -790,6 +790,9 @@ emit_precossin(struct

When compiling code with lld -O0 --lto-O0 --eh-frame-hdr I get strange interleaved line info all over the place: ... 0x00000000000595ac 22 11 1 0 0 is_stmt 0x00000000000595bc 25 7 1 0 0 is_stmt <<< 0x00000000000595c0 22 11 1 0 0 is_stmt 0x00000000000595c4 25 7 1 0 0 is_stmt <<< 0x00000000000595c8 26 7 1 0 0 is_stmt but the code only has 1 reference to line 25 and the

---------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:15:02 -0700 > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] question about alignment of structures on the stack (arm 32) > From: t.p.northover at gmail.com > To: alexey.perevalov at hotmail.com > CC: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >> I'm using MachO loader (https://github.com/LubosD/darling/). I'm trying to make it work on