search for: disagr

There appears to be a disagreement between the encoding given in the sources for Siren14 that are downloaded from Polycom (and the ITU, both are the same) and that implemented by codec_siren14.so. The latter agrees with the actual device. If I make a .sln32 file and run the encoder from ITU/Polycom with encode 0 foo.sln32...

Hi! I am using R to process some community survey data. Several item responses are recorded via a 7-point Likert-Scale. As I have coded the responses, 1 represents high agreement, and 7 high disagreement. This of course impacts the coefficients in a linear regression (of example agreement to self-perception measures on housing satisfaction). For some purposes, in order to make the coefficients more accessible to the reader, I would like to invert the item values, i.e. to arrive at 1 for high...

My virtual users have their mail stored in /usr/local/virtual/user at example.com/ dovecot wants to read the mail from /usr/local/virtual/user at example.com/Maildir which is causing problems since all new mail is being written in /usr/local/virtual/user at example.com/new and dovecot is looking in /usr/local/virtual/user at example.com/Maildir/new For the local users, /home/user/Maildir is the

...k we have some miscommunication happening. > > Here's how I am thinking about things. Reviews should keep happening > the way they are. Agreed. > In fact, what we are doing now is exactly the same > work one would have to do to review a git branch, but that's immaterial. Disagreed. The point is that I should not see a stream of 20 decomposed patches from you. When I get to one that is "wrong" or needs changes (e.g. patch 6), then all the other patches after it get ignored. This is silly. Instead, what I should see are (for example) and be asked to review the...

Is there any way of preserving order of ordered factors when storing a table in PostgreSQL? I have been using PostgreSQL and the RPgSQL package to store a large table with answers such as "Strong disagreement", "Strong agreement", "Mild disagreement". "Mild agreement". When reading the table, such answers are turned into factors, apparently in reverse alphabetical order. If I reorder them using ordered(factor, levels=the order I want), everything is f...

In species distribution modeling where one uses a large sample of background points to capture background variation in presence\pseudo-absence or use\available models (0\1 response) it is frequently recommended that one weight the data so the sum of the absence weights is equal to the sum of presence weights so that the model isn?t swamped by an overwhelming and arbitrary number of background

A user alerted me to a problem when he renamed an upper level mail folder and lost access to a lower level folder under it. I tried with and without listescape, it didn't seem to make a difference, and I saw no errors in the dovecot log. Symptoms are if a client has a maildir folder tree .a and .a.b and renames a to c in their client, Thunderbird shows c/b but b is inaccessible since it

I was asked by my boss to do an analysis on a large data set, and I am trying to convince him to let me use R rather than SPSS. I think Sweave could make my life much much easier. To get me a little closer to this goal, I ran my analysis through R and SPSS and compared the resulting values. In all but one case, they were the same. Given the matrix [,1] [,2] [1,] 110 358 [2,] 71 312 [3,]

Dear friends - occurring in Windows R2.6.2 I am modeling physical chemistry in collaboration with a friend who has preferred working in Excel. I used uniroot, and find a solution to a two buffer problem in acid-base chemistry which I believe is physiologically sensible. Using "goal seek" in Excel my friend found another plausible root, quite close to zero, and a plot of the function

...In fact, what we are doing now is exactly the same work one would have to do to review a git branch, but that's immaterial. There are great tools in git for sending a patch stream to the mailing list. To me, there isn't a compelling reason to change the current review system. I think the disagreement (if we can call it that) is really over what actually gets pushed to "mainline" which I assume would be defined as "master" on llvm.org. Chris wants the commits to happen in sequence, in exactly the same order as patches sent to the review list. It is not very difficult...

...looks like something like this: col1 col2 col3 col4 1 5 5 4 5 2 3 5 3 1 3 2 3 4 5 4 3 1 1 2 5 5 5 4 5 6 4 2 5 5 .... Each row represents a single questionnaire with someone giving his agreement/disagreement with a statement (each column is a statement) that is coded from 1 to 5. I need to draw a barplot giving a visual representation showing differences between the five columns: Each bar should represent a single column, and should be divided into 5 sections, the thickness of each depending...

...one needs to set up an extra service, not always possible - use stunnel - as above - use SSH - is not as powerful as in daemon mode (i.e. read only access, chroot, easy way of adding/modifying users and modules etc.) Why was encrypted communication in rsyncd never implemented? Some technical disagreements? Nobody volunteered? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://www.sslrack.com

...gration conversations have involved a whole lot of people talking past each other and a lot of assumptions that are not shared. Many of us are very much not on the same page. The only thing that we had a significant consensus on was that we'd like to move to GitHub. Other than that we have more disagreement than agreement. We do not have consensus on an all-in-one monorepo, and any notion that we do is ignoring the significant dissent. There was less disagreement with a mono-repo that had only tightly coupled projects, but that itself is hard to nail down and define, and there are still many pe...

...eviews ? #. Sometimes patches get committed that need more discussion. If a developer thinks that a patch would benefit from some more review and promptly communicates this, the patch should be reverted (preferably by the original author, unless they are unresponsive). Developers often disagree, and erring on the side of the developer asking for more review prevents any lingering disagreement over code in the tree. "promptly" is there mostly to avoid suggesting a "necro-revert"; once the code has been in tree for long enough at some point it would be more appr...

...an this loss of participation is to have a hostile environment where people are afraid to voice opinions. If we cannot discuss ideas ? even radical ones ? openly and freely without fear of recrimination, then we are dead as an open source project. In the Asterisk Developer Community, we often have disagreements about technical decisions and the direction of the project. Sometimes those disagreements are quite passionate. That's a good thing. We are all only human, and sometimes we all make mistakes. The only way we can keep the project moving forward in the best manner possible is if we allow f...

Hi, all. I have a simple design I'm comparing to output from SPSS. the design is 1 repeated measure (session) and 1 between measure (cond). my dependent measure is rl. here is the data I'm using (in a data.frame): mig <- data.frame(subj=factor(rep(subj,3)), cond=factor(rep(cond,3)), session=factor(c(rep(1,nsubj),rep(2,nsubj),rep(3,nsubj))),

Over in pr26718, we ran across a case where input IR had one PHI within a basic block using the value of another PHI within the same basic block (without a backedge). There has been some disagreement as to whether this is valid IR. I believe it is not. The verifier currently accepts the following code without error: define void @f() { entry: br label %next next: %y = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ] %x = phi i32 [ %y, %entry ] ret void } Looking at the code, this may be an oversigh...

Hello all, I have been using R's time series capabilities to perform analysis for quite some time now and I am having some questions regarding its reliability. In several cases I have had substantial disagreement between R and other packages (such as gretl and the commercial EViews package). I have just encountered another problem and thought I'd post it to the list. In this case, Gretl and EViews give me similar estimations, but R is completely different. The EViews results and gretl results a...

.... > On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:48 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Peter Lawrence via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Chandler, > where we disagree is in whether the current project is moving the issue > forward. It is not. It is making the compiler more complex for no additional value. > > The current project is not based in evidence, I have asked for any SPEC benchmark > that shows performance gain by the compiler taking adv...

Chandler, where we disagree is in whether the current project is moving the issue forward. It is not. It is making the compiler more complex for no additional value. The current project is not based in evidence, I have asked for any SPEC benchmark that shows performance gain by the compiler taking advantage of “undefined...