search for: disadventages

somebody can advise me ... about adventage, disadventage, comparison statistical parameter between HTB and HFSC or which link telling above knowledge, .... please i try to find it but hard to find it. Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger Download today it''s FREE! _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

The most dramatic disadventage of kvm guest is block device I/O, so I wouldn't recommend to virtualize file server if it is not necessary. In my case on host ntpd configured as source for virtual dc, and bind9 configured as type=slave for zones hosted on dc, (make shure that srv records in _msdcs.mysambadomain.local are resolving when virtual dc is down) and smbd fileserver with

...eated on nfs sometimes get crushed and I need to delete indexes in case of fetching mails ( I see mails on hd but when telnet on host and make stat I don't see any). Does version 1.1.x correct this errors ? And what is better to use : nfs or memory indexing ? Can someone point me adventages and disadventages of using both solutions? Best regards, Sebastian

Is kvm I/O realy disadventage? I use samba file server as kvm guest (LVM storage pool) in some setups and disn't notice any problems. Sequential read/write speed isn't noticeably different from non-virtualized samba host. Did I miss something and should expect sudden trouble? In a letter dated Tuesday, December 27, 2016 2:12:59 MSK by Andrei Petrov via samba wrote: > The most dramatic

29.12.2016 19:01, Filippe LeMarchand пишет: > Is kvm I/O realy disadventage? I use samba file server as kvm guest > (LVM storage pool) in some setups and disn't notice any problems. > Sequential read/write speed isn't noticeably different from > non-virtualized samba host. Did I miss something and should expect > sudden trouble? No you shouldn't. What I meant is: of

I have been looking at the hfsc for some time as a replacement or at a class that can be used like htb. But I seem to have run into a problem. With htb classes it is easy to make three or more levels of priority for a connection. All you need to do is to make classes and give them different prio levels. But it seems like you can only define a real-time bandwidth and a link sharing bandwidth.

...ect to the server running the service by using its respective dns name (i.e. if I'd like to ssh into the server running the mailserver I'd just type ssh username at mailserver.mydomain.com Until now it sounds like something easy to accomplish with the Alias feature. *But* this has a few disadventages to me: - It requires a client side configuration which would need to be synced between multiple clients (i.e. laptop, pc) - It requires to make a change (and resync to all my devices) this config when I move a service to another server instead of just changing the DNS settings which are automa...

...chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 3 lose cover RAM: 1974M mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value please specify mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size -------------- use 16 GB ECC Ram on this server, all modules are the same (speed, manufacuer - Kingston, etc). Here are my questions: 1. o you know what disadventages this could make on server installation 2. what should I modify in server configuration to solve this problem?