search for: disablecorefil

...and - // usable by the JIT. - InitializeNativeTarget(); - InitializeNativeTargetAsmPrinter(); - - cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(argc, argv, - "llvm interpreter & dynamic compiler\n"); - - // If the user doesn't want core files, disable them. - if (DisableCoreFiles) - sys::Process::PreventCoreFiles(); - +typedef struct { + int argc; + char **argv; + char *const *envp; +} arg_t; + +void *run(void *arg) { + int argc = ((arg_t *) arg)->argc; + char **argv = ((arg_t *) arg)->argv; + char *const *envp = ((arg_t *) arg)->envp; + LLVMConte...

...vector<std::string>(), // ExtraModules > std::vector<std::string>(), // ExtraObjects > std::vector<std::string>(), // ExtraArchives > false, // EnableCacheManager > std::string(), // ObjectCacheDir > std::string(), // FakeArgv0 > false, // DisableCoreFiles > false, // NoLazyCompilation > Reloc::PIC_, // RelocModel > CodeModel::JITDefault, // CMModel > true, // GenerateSoftFloatCalls > FloatABI::Soft, // FloatABIForCalls > false, // EmitJitDebugInfo > false // EmitJitDebugInfoToDisk > ); >...

Both Clang/LLVM 3.4 -> Clang/LLVM 3.5 And i will also try using MCJIT. 2014-09-17 18:56 GMT+06:00 Anton Smirnov <dev at antonsmirnov.name>: > Hi, Tim. > > I've used Clang 3.4 final release and now i'm going to test it with 3.5 > release (since i've read about arm64 improvements). > I will report my results. > > BTW, is it possible to get smth like

...;>> std::vector<std::string>(), // ExtraObjects >>> std::vector<std::string>(), // ExtraArchives >>> false, // EnableCacheManager >>> std::string(), // ObjectCacheDir >>> std::string(), // FakeArgv0 >>> false, // DisableCoreFiles >>> false, // NoLazyCompilation >>> Reloc::PIC_, // RelocModel >>> CodeModel::JITDefault, // CMModel >>> true, // GenerateSoftFloatCalls >>> FloatABI::Soft, // FloatABIForCalls >>> false, // EmitJitDebugInfo >>&gt...

...>(), // ExtraObjects >>>>> std::vector<std::string>(), // ExtraArchives >>>>> false, // EnableCacheManager >>>>> std::string(), // ObjectCacheDir >>>>> std::string(), // FakeArgv0 >>>>> false, // DisableCoreFiles >>>>> false, // NoLazyCompilation >>>>> Reloc::PIC_, // RelocModel >>>>> CodeModel::JITDefault, // CMModel >>>>> true, // GenerateSoftFloatCalls >>>>> FloatABI::Soft, // FloatABIForCalls >>>&gt...

Here is the bulk of the sanitizing. My residual doubts center around the question whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code in 2.0/2.1. I need a definitive word on this to proceed. My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code (instead of *bit*code). I did not touch those areas, so the attached