Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dis_clang".
Did you mean:
as_clang
2015 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Setting preserve-bc-use-list-order=true by default
...ated tools: 0.83% to 9.19% (details in
filesize_clang.txt, attached).
- Time increase of running `llvm-dis` on merged bitcode files:
— 6.4% to 15% on SPEC benchmarks with running time >= 1 second.
— 7.9% to 14.5% on clang with running time >= 1 second (details in
dis_clang.txt, attached).
- Time increase of running `llvm-as` on merged bitcode files:
— 3.5% to 39% on SPEC benchmarks with running time >= 1 second.
— 14.7% to 24.5% with running time >= 1 second (details in
as_clang.txt, attached).
Does it work?
=============
Manman also ran...
2015 Apr 09
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Setting preserve-bc-use-list-order=true by default
...% (details in
> filesize_clang.txt, attached).
> - Time increase of running `llvm-dis` on merged bitcode files:
> — 6.4% to 15% on SPEC benchmarks with running time >= 1 second.
> — 7.9% to 14.5% on clang with running time >= 1 second (details in
> dis_clang.txt, attached).
> - Time increase of running `llvm-as` on merged bitcode files:
> — 3.5% to 39% on SPEC benchmarks with running time >= 1 second.
> — 14.7% to 24.5% with running time >= 1 second (details in
> as_clang.txt, attached).
>
> These seem lik...
2015 Apr 14
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Setting preserve-bc-use-list-order=true by default
...filesize_clang.txt, attached).
> > - Time increase of running `llvm-dis` on merged bitcode files:
> > — 6.4% to 15% on SPEC benchmarks with running time >= 1 second.
> > — 7.9% to 14.5% on clang with running time >= 1 second (details in
> > dis_clang.txt, attached).
> > - Time increase of running `llvm-as` on merged bitcode files:
> > — 3.5% to 39% on SPEC benchmarks with running time >= 1 second.
> > — 14.7% to 24.5% with running time >= 1 second (details in
> > as_clang.txt, attached).
>...