search for: directcalls

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "directcalls".

2005 May 09
3
ANNOUNCEMENT : AreskiCC V2.2 - Asterisk CallingCard Application
Dear All, Here the version 2.2 a new version of your dear CallingCard Software !!! http://www.areski.net/areskicc-doc-v2/ Many new features have been added and several enhancements made! Newest features : - A new re-build rate-engine - LCR & LCD management (OOOOHHH YESSSSS) - Billing Increment - Progressive Rate - Scheduled Rates (days of the weeks) - Expiration rates - Buy rates
2010 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] How to run regression tests for ARM?
Hello. I experience a problem when I try to run LLVM tests on the ARM "Beagle" board with Debian Lenny installed on it. When I execute "make check", I get the following output: llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/markhor/llvm/nativeBuild/test' Making a new site.exp file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 512000
2013 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal
On 10/22/13 10:34 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote: > On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Philip R <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > >> On 10/17/13 10:39 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >>> This is a proposal for adding Stackmaps and Patchpoints to LLVM. The >>> first client of these features is the JavaScript compiler within the >>> open source WebKit project.
2010 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] How to run regression tests for ARM?
Hello. I experience a problem when I try to run LLVM tests on the ARM "Beagle" board with Debian Lenny installed on it. When I execute "make check", I get the following output: llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/markhor/llvm/nativeBuild/test' Making a new site.exp file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 512000
2013 Oct 22
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal
On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Philip R <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > On 10/17/13 10:39 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> This is a proposal for adding Stackmaps and Patchpoints to LLVM. The >> first client of these features is the JavaScript compiler within the >> open source WebKit project. >> > I have a couple of comments on your proposal. None of these
2010 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] How to run regression tests for ARM?
Hello. I experience a problem when I try to run LLVM tests on the ARM "Beagle" board with Debian Lenny installed on it. When I execute "make check", I get the following output: llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/markhor/llvm/nativeBuild/test' Making a new site.exp file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 512000
2010 Sep 09
3
[LLVMdev] How to run regression tests for ARM?
Hello. I experience a problem when I try to run LLVM tests on the ARM "Beagle" board with Debian Lenny installed on it. When I execute "make check", I get the following output: llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/markhor/llvm/nativeBuild/test' Making a new site.exp file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 512000
2013 Oct 22
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal
On Oct 22, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Philip R <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > On 10/22/13 10:34 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote: >> On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Philip R <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: >> >>> On 10/17/13 10:39 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >>>> This is a proposal for adding Stackmaps and Patchpoints to LLVM. The >>>> first client
2018 Apr 27
0
ThinLTO + CFI
For the test case below, I get the following IR for main() on entry to ThinLTO backend invocation of LowerTypeTestsModule::lower(). This is after I moved this pass down in the pipeline so it’s invoked after inlining. The declarations for foo() and bar() are read in at the time of module import, Importer.importFunctions() in lto::thinBackend(). They do not have type metadata attached to them. In
2018 Apr 27
3
ThinLTO + CFI
> We could probably tolerate a certain amount of unused jump table entries. However, I just realized that all non-inline imported calls end up going through a jump table entry. Is that correct? In fact it is all calls that go through a function pointer type that is used anywhere in the program for an indirect call, but depending on your program that could be very close to "yes".
2018 Apr 30
4
ThinLTO + CFI
...n/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180430/6a98dc73/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: thinlto+cfi-directcalls.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2593 bytes Desc: thinlto+cfi-directcalls.diff URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180430/6a98dc73/attachment.obj> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: thinlto+cfi-movepass.diff Ty...
2013 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] r192750 - Enable MI Sched for x86.
I should mention a couple of useful self-explanatory LLVM flags for triage: -enable-misched=false -verify-misched -Andy On Oct 15, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Grats on the work, a long time coming! > > Beware the incoming register allocation bugs ;) > > -eric > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at