Displaying 20 results from an estimated 539 matches for "dipping".
Did you mean:
ripping
1997 Apr 29
9
Yet Another DIP Exploit?
I seem to have stumbled across another vulnerability in DIP. It
appears to allow any user to gain control of arbitrary devices in /dev.
For instance, I have successfully stolen keystrokes from a root login as
follows... (I could also dump characters to the root console)
$ whoami
cesaro
$ cat < /dev/tty1 <------ root login here
bash: /dev/tty1: Permission denied
2006 Jan 18
3
linear contrasts with anova
I have some doubts about the validity of my procedure to estimeate linear contrasts ina a factorial design.
For sake of semplicity, let's imagine a one way ANOVA with three levels. I am interested to test the significance of the difference between the first and third level (called here contrast C1) and between the first and the seconda level (called here contrast C2). I used the following
2004 Oct 22
1
p-values for the dip test
Hi all,
I am using Hartigan & Hartigan's [1] "dip test" of unimodality via the
diptest package in R. The function dip() returns the value of the test
statistic but I am having problems calculating the p-value associated with
that value. I'm hoping someone here is familiar with this process and can
explain it.
In the original article there is an example using n=63 and a
2013 Apr 07
1
[Dovecot-de] Dovecot Quota via policy service abfragen
Hallo Waffenmeister!
Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de> wrote:
> > Apr 7 14:07:52 delta postfix/qmgr[19078]: 1D8921B31260: from=<anmeyer at anup.de>, size=1492149, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> > Apr 7 14:07:53 delta postfix/pipe[19091]: 1D8921B31260: to=<miles at anup.de>, relay=dovecot, delay=2542, delays=2542/0.01/0/0.29, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred
2011 Dec 21
1
Diptest- I'm getting significant values when I shouldn't?
>From library(diptest):
Shouldn't the following almost always be non-significant for
Hartigan's dip test?
dip(x = rnorm(1000))
I get dip scores of around 0.0008 which based on p values taken from
the table (at N=1000), using the command: qDiptab, are 0.02 < p <
0.05.
Anyone familiar with Hartigan's dip test and what I may not be
understanding?
Thanks,
kbrownk
2009 May 13
1
High Volume US Traffic? Claim DIP Compensation!
This could be a nice opportunity for users with a high volume of SIP traffic
terminating in the US:
Collecting dip fees on outbound phone calls - fees that would otherwise go
to the local phone company.
With all the recent fees and surcharges, the cost of wholesale telecom and
dialer traffic keeps rising. But what many companies with a high volume of
IP based voice traffic don't realize
2009 Jul 06
2
Hartigan's Dip test
Hi,
I just got a value for the dip test out of my data of 0.074 for a sample
size of 33. I'm trying to work out what this actually means though?
Could someone help me relate this to a p-value?
Thanks
James
2005 Dec 17
2
nlme problems
I'm maximising a reasonably complex function using nlme (version
3.1-65, have also tried 3.1-66) and am having trouble with fixed
parameter estimates slightly away from the maximum of the log
likelihood. I have profiled the log likelihood and it is a parabola
but with sum dips. Interestingly changing the parameterisation moves
the dips around slightly. Unfortunately the PNLS step is
2011 Apr 05
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: don't split dio bios if we don't have to
We have been unconditionally allocating a new bio and re-adding all pages from
our original bio to the new bio. This is needed if our original bio is larger
than our stripe size, but if it is smaller than the stripe size then there is no
need to do this. So check the map length and if we are under that then go ahead
and submit the original bio. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
2023 May 09
5
[Bridge] [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] Add layer 2 miss indication and filtering
tl;dr
=====
This patchset adds a single bit to the skb to indicate that a packet
encountered a layer 2 miss in the bridge and extends flower to match on
this metadata. This is required for non-DF (Designated Forwarder)
filtering in EVPN multi-homing which prevents decapsulated BUM packets
from being forwarded multiple times to the same multi-homed host.
Background
==========
In a typical EVPN
2023 May 18
5
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add layer 2 miss indication and filtering
tl;dr
=====
This patchset adds a single bit to the skb to indicate that a packet
encountered a layer 2 miss in the bridge and extends flower to match on
this metadata. This is required for non-DF (Designated Forwarder)
filtering in EVPN multi-homing which prevents decapsulated BUM packets
from being forwarded multiple times to the same multi-homed host.
Background
==========
In a typical EVPN
2004 May 10
2
trellis plot problem with R-1.9.0-1
I tried following commands:
amp~time|subject/trial #this was the grouping structure of the data
plot(dip,inner=~condition,layout=c(2,2))
after the plot command I obtained this error message:
Error in if(!any(cond.max.level - cond.current.level <0)&&(row-1)* :
missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
This error only occured in compination with "layout". It was no
2007 Feb 20
1
tree()
Hi
I am trying to use tree() to classify movements in a futures contract. My
data is like this:
diff dip dim adx
1 0 100.00000 8650.0000 100.00000
2 0 93.18540 2044.5455 93.18540
3 0 90.30995 1549.1169 90.30995
4 1 85.22030 927.0419 85.22030
5 1 85.36084
2006 Dec 05
0
Jumpers and DIP switches on Atcom AX-4S and AX-1E
Hello all !
Does anyone have a document describing jumpers, DIP switches, and connectors
on Atcom's AX-4S (HFC-4S based 4xBRI) and AX-1E (HFC-1E based 1xPRI) cards
? Got the cards without any documents, there is nothing on a subject on
Atcom's site, and so far no one from their support is replying to my emails.
Thanks very much.
Cheers,
Nenad
-------------- next part
2015 Dec 15
8
[PATCH] xfs: Add support for v3 directories
Besides supporting newer version of xfs file system, this patch also
does some code refactoring and fix completely broken listing and
searching on v2-3 node directories.
Cc: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com>
Cc: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com>
Cc: Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr
2010 May 07
6
[PATCH 1/5] fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO V2
V1->V2: Check to see if our current ppos is >= i_size after a short DIO read,
just in case it was actually a short read and we need to just return.
This is similar to what already happens in the write case. If we have a short
read while doing O_DIRECT, instead of just returning, fallthrough and try to
read the rest via buffered IO. BTRFS needs this because if we encounter a
compressed or
2011 May 29
5
Free CNAM
FreeCNAM.org is providing a free CNAM API for Open Source PBX users.
This API queries a private CNAM database, and returns standard
15-Character CNAM results. Any entry not already in the database will
be queued for investigation, and added to the database as soon as
information is located. This system has access to several CNAM
backends, and is not a party to any use-limiting or no-caching
2012 Nov 09
1
Duda sobre modas en un distribución
Hola a tod en s, estoy intentando averiguar el número de modas en una
distribución. Para ello utilizo diptest. Mi duda es que no acabo de
entender cuando la información suministrada por los test suponen la
existencia o no de unimodalidad/multimodalidad. Una parte de la salidad de
diptest es la que pego a continuación (el resto esta en el fichero adjunto
con las distribuciones kernels y las
2009 Jul 07
4
Caller ID (name) - where does it come from?
Hi Folks, having an issue with outbound calls through a VOIP provider. Calls
get sent out with the CallerID(number), but where does callerID(name) come
from? Apparently not from provider, as we are seeing different (sometime
missing) names on inbound calls, different than what we have configured.
Apparently this comes from some telco database somewhere? Numbers were
ported from a wired-telco.
2006 Feb 10
1
precision of std. error in summary
Hi,
I'm doing robust regression with the following command
rlm(dip~ind1+ind2-1,method="M",psi=psi,maxit=1000,acc=1e-15)
now when I ask for a summary
summary(rlm(dip~ind1+ind2-1,method="M",psi=psi,maxit=1000,acc=1e-15))
I get
Coefficients:
Value Std. Error t value
ind1 -0.0377 0.0000 -24203.1415
ind2 1.0370 0.0000 668735.7195
taht is