search for: dipohl

..., there were previous discussions. e.g. http://centos-devel.1051824.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-devel-yum-plugin-security-and-shellshock-td5710031.html HTH -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gabriele Pohl" <gp at dipohl.de> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Saturday, 22 November, 2014 11:49:19 > Subject: [CentOS] yum-plugin-security > Hi all, > > I have difficulties to understand the output of yum-plugin-security. > > I am on a X86_64 machine a...

Hi, on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line broken_system_clock = 1 I found this because on all of them, the root partition was not checked triggered by interval setting with tune2fs. Do you see similiar /default/ settings on your machines? Is it an issue only on VMs? I have no CentOS7 host on bare metal to compare. Thanks and cheers,

Hi there, In my last request I have asked info about backuppc and other backup solutions. After some test I have choosen bacula. Many people said it's too complex and try to make it works is a challenge. I've tested backuppc and I don't like it for a stupid reason... I must install on centos external software, configure a web server with cgi with suid enabled (apache does not have

Hi all, I have difficulties to understand the output of yum-plugin-security. I am on a X86_64 machine and when I query for security updates, yum lists i686 packages, that I don't have installed. -------------------- # yum check-update --security Loaded plugins: changelog, fastestmirror, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.mirror.linuxwerk.com * epel:

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:00:50 -0600 Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/22/2014 05:49 AM, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I have difficulties to understand the output of yum-plugin-security. > > > > # yum check-update --security > > CentOS only tests that things work when doing all updates ... it does > not test any other grouping of packages. when I

Hi Allessandro and all Bacula users and especially to (potential) Bacula contributors, On Mon, 11 May 2015 20:49:08 +0200 Alessandro Baggi <alessandro.baggi at gmail.com> wrote: > In my last request I have asked info about backuppc and other backup > solutions. After some test I have choosen bacula. Concerning the topic "Free Software" I read that the relations between

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:21:00 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > > on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors > > the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line > > > > broken_system_clock = 1 > > > > Do you see similiar /default/ settings on > > your machines? Is

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:46:02 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I now changed the value to 0 and rebooted. > > > > After that fsck based on Interval setting were done. > > > > Unfortunately that is not true for the root partition. > > For that I had to use maxCount settings to

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:07:00 -0600 Frank Cox <theatre at melvilletheatre.com> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:32:32 +0100 > Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > > As written in my other mail, the intention is > > to get triggered when security updates are pending. > > why not set up something to watch the centos-announce list, > parse the subject lines for

Hi, I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel for this CentOS release as I have seen now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ 1. Will I have to make an upgrade of the existing mail server to get security patches again or is it not critical to use

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:17:59 -0600 Frank Cox <theatre at melvilletheatre.com> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:52:30 +0100 > Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > > > because I want the alert for my individual machines. > > So the proposed method is no solution > > for an automagical trigger :) > > You still can do that without expending too much effort. Although

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:23:28 +1200 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 23/04/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > > for this CentOS release as I have seen now: > >

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:10:40 -0600 "John R. Dennison" <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:41:17PM +0100, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > > > I don't like to spend time in creating ugly workarounds.. > > and therefore would highly appreciate if the CentOS-Developers > > will add the data to the yum repositories. > > Then I can