Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "dionysus".
Did you mean:
dionysius
1999 Jun 24
0
Forw: [RHEA-1999:010-01] Update to PHP 3.0.9 (mod_php3)
...nal.gov>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 14:34:24 -0500
Received: (qmail 26381 invoked by uid 501); 22 Jun 1999 20:28:24 -0000
Resent-Date: 22 Jun 1999 20:28:24 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
MBOX-Line: From redhat-watch-list-request@redhat.com Tue Jun 22 16:28:23 1999
X-Authentication-Warning: dionysus.devel.redhat.com: pbrown owned process
doing -bs
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:59:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Preston Brown <pbrown@redhat.com>
X-Sender: pbrown@dionysus.devel.redhat.com
To: redhat-watch-list@redhat.com
Subject: [RHEA-1999:010-01] Update to PHP 3.0.9 (mod_php3)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX...
1999 Jun 24
0
Forw: [RHSA-1999:015-01] KDE update for Red Hat Linux 6.0
...nal.gov>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 14:32:45 -0500
Received: (qmail 20814 invoked by uid 501); 22 Jun 1999 20:26:38 -0000
Resent-Date: 22 Jun 1999 20:26:38 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
MBOX-Line: From redhat-watch-list-request@redhat.com Tue Jun 22 16:26:37 1999
X-Authentication-Warning: dionysus.devel.redhat.com: pbrown owned process
doing -bs
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Preston Brown <pbrown@redhat.com>
X-Sender: pbrown@dionysus.devel.redhat.com
To: redhat-watch-list@redhat.com
Subject: [RHSA-1999:015-01] KDE update for Red Hat Linux 6.0
Message-ID: <Pine.L...
2005 Sep 08
1
can't successfully use installed evir package
I'm next at installing packages. I seem to have successfully installed "evir", but I can't use it. I'm wondering if I need to specify the installation to match my working directory, or something else.
thx,
G
1998 May 09
4
Apparent SNMP remote-root vulnerability.
...Hat 5.0''s cmu-snmp-3.4-3
when configured as shipped. I have a combination birthday/Mother''s Day
party to get to, so I can''t do much more investigating.
(In case anyone else has any similar experiences, connections were from
southshore.com and shell.dhp.com. Someone from dionysus.publib.nf.ca did
a port scan of my machine on April 27 at 5 a.m. EDT.)
If this turns out to be a simple misconfiguration, then I''m an idiot for
posting this, but it should still not be possible to open up a system to
remote root access simply by installing a standard RPM.
--
Dan
From m...
2002 May 27
1
security = none?
hey guys. I am running a samba server on my machine at home, which has
two other machines on it - both running windows, one's mine and one's
my flatmates. Since I am running samba on a trusted network (and I do
have the hosts allow rule restricting access so that when I connect to
the net people can't just start using my samba server), I am wanting
to essentially remove the security