search for: dilt

...rguments require a string. Sorry, I forgot to mention that. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you do something like `-mode={if,od}` and make the option required? > > -- Sean Silva > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Dilts via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> With the CommandLine library, is there a way to specify that one of two >> options must be present? >> >> I have two parameters, -if and -od. I want an error if neither is >> present or if both are...

On 3/12/15 8:14 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ahmed Bougacha > <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com <mailto:ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: > >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary...

...Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > You have to provide this function and initialize the whole MC > infrastructure. > > See e.g. lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMMCTargetDesc.cpp > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, llvm::InitializeAllTargetMCs(void) does seem to be autogenerated. > It > > is _LLVMInitializeFooTargetMC that I can't find documented anywhere. > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Anton Korobeynikov > > <an...

...argetMC that I can't find documented anywhere. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > This function is autogenerated. You need also to change top-level > configure / cmake files. > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > In attempting to add a backend I came across the documentation here: > > http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html > > > > The section on the build system seems to be out of date, or maybe I don't > > understand it. I...

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Take a look at how debuggers have migrated through the years. They too >> >> used to have their own script format. Now most (all?) popular debuggers >> do scripting through embedding an actual programming language. This >> c...

[+Saleem] On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > I am using CMake 3.1.2. > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It looks like your command fails early in CMake TryCompile tests. Does >> (your version of) CMake supports us...

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcp...

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Dilts via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 2. Will LLD and LLDB be updated as necessary to support CodeView? > Rui is is looking at making LLD link codeview from object files into PDBs. Zachary Turner intends to add PDB reading support to LLDB. We already have a PDB implement...

...M. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> > wrote: > >> [+Saleem] >> >> >> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I am using CMake 3.1.2. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It looks like your command fails early in CMake Tr...

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Will Newton <will.newton at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> > On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <d...

I am getting the following error while trying to checkout LLVM. I deleted my local copy (no changes) just in case something was causing the issue, but it didn't fix it. Tree conflict on 'llvm\test\Bindings\Ocaml' > local dir unversioned, incoming dir add upon update Select: (r) mark resolved, (p) postpone, (q) quit resolution, (h) help: -------------- next part --------------

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote: > [+Saleem] > > > On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am using CMake 3.1.2. >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It looks like your command fails early in CMake TryCompile tests. Does >>> (yo...

I need to correct myself. It is possible to cross compile it on Windows, but not using the provided build systems. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > I asked about this same question in the past (month or three ago). It is > not possible to cross compile compiler-rt on Windows. If you want to cross > compile you should use the make build system, not the CMake build system. > > On Sun, Mar...

I second the motion. All in favor? On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 1 April 2016 at 18:50, Richard Smith via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > * The name has been used by a kickstarter project, causing incalculable > > confusion[0] > > Neal Stephenson has poetic license to do

Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like something that would be feasible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150312/36eae2e4/attachment.html>

With the CommandLine library, is there a way to specify that one of two options must be present? I have two parameters, -if and -od. I want an error if neither is present or if both are present. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160404/dbae63e0/attachment.html>

In attempting to add a backend I came across the documentation here: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html The section on the build system seems to be out of date, or maybe I don't understand it. I copied the Sparc target to a directory (Foo for the example), added Foo to the subdirectories list in llvm\lib\Target\LLVMBuild.txt and to LLVM_ALL_TARGETS in llvm\CMakeLists.txt. I

> > > Linker scripts are worse than everything - except for the alternatives > that > > we know about. Any particular suggestions here? > > I very much care about the functionality provided by linker scripts (for > embedded systems and kernel work), but I do agree that most current > script formats are hard to use, debug, reason about, etc... I have > often

...pile on Windows. I ended up having to find the list in the CMake build system (not very hard) and manually creating a makefile to compile them. Took maybe 2 hours total. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Chao Yan <yanchao2012 at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2015-03-29 15:11 GMT-05:00 Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com>: > >> I need to correct myself. It is possible to cross compile it on Windows, >> but not using the provided build systems. > > > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for helping. I'm using ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 system. I've tried cmake > for...

...Apr 1, 2016 5:34 PM, "George Burgess IV via cfe-dev" < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > How are we casting our votes? Discordantly! > Will this be a standard yay-or-neigh format, or do people prefer an alternate method? > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Daniel Dilts via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I second the motion. All in favor? >> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 1 April 2016 at 18:50, Richard Smith via cf...