search for: dijuremo

...ff, the roaming profile fails with error message: Your roaming profile was not completely synchronized. See the event log for details or contact administrator. Further inspection of the event viewer shows several entries like: ----------------------------- Windows cannot copy file \\?\C:\Users\dijuremo\Favorites\Links to location \\?\UNC\p3file\Users\dijuremo\.winprofile.V2\Favorites\Links. This error may be caused by network problems or insufficient security rights. DETAIL - The parameter is incorrect. ----------------------------- The client logs show messages such as: -----------------...

...client and brick logs back to info. Let me know if I need to redo any tests, change any steps or provide more logs I may have missed. Diego On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 03-Jun-2017 3:27 AM, "Diego Remolina" <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Is there anything else we could do to check on this problem and try to > fix it? The issue is definitively related to either the samba vfs > gluster plugin or gluster itself. I am not sure how to pin it down > futher. > > >...

...erver which is on a local filesystem where the OS is installed, not part of gluster: # mount | grep home ]# ls -ld /home drwxr-xr-x. 14 root root 4096 Jun 2 17:21 /home This shows this is not mounted from anywhere. so I created a folder and shared it: ]# ls -ld /home/rvtsharetest/ drwxrwx---. 3 dijuremo Staff 95 Jun 2 17:31 /home/rvtsharetest/ ]# tail -7 /etc/samba/smb.conf [rvtsharetest] path=/home/rvtsharetest browseable = yes write list = @Staff,dijuremo guest ok = yes create mask = 664 directory mask = 775 When accessing Revit files in this new share the problem is *not* o...

On 03-Jun-2017 3:27 AM, "Diego Remolina" <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: Hi everyone, Is there anything else we could do to check on this problem and try to fix it? The issue is definitively related to either the samba vfs gluster plugin or gluster itself. I am not sure how to pin it down futher. I don't think it is vfs plugin because you...

Did the logs provide any hints as to what the issue may be? Diego On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to look into this. Since we needed downtime > due to the gluster update, we also updated the OS, including samba. We > went from 4.2.x to 4.4.4 and many other packages for CentOS were > updated as well. OS and samba updates were insta...

....x86_64 glusterfs-api-3.10.3-1.el7.x86_64 centos-release-gluster310-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch glusterfs-fuse-3.10.3-1.el7.x86_64 samba-vfs-glusterfs-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 glusterfs-libs-3.10.3-1.el7.x86_64 glusterfs-cli-3.10.3-1.el7.x86_64 Diego On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if you have had a chance to review the logs and if you > can tell me know if more information is needed. > > Diego > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: >> Did the logs...

...d after trying and failing to tweak the smb.conf on my original hardware conf. I found that compiling it for my specific architecture (i686) increased my performance by 100% (from a punny 0.8 MB/s to a better but still punny 1.6 MB/s). -----Original Message----- From: Diego Julian Remolina [mailto:dijuremo@math.gatech.edu] Sent: sábado, 28 de maio de 2005 23:24 To: 'peter'; 'AragonX'; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] Horrendously slow transfer speeds in FC3 is drivingmecrazy!!! Please help... - SOLVED! I had some problems with the stock samba in RHEL4 which is pretty much b...

Hi Diego, Just to clarify, so did you do an offline upgrade with an existing cluster (3.6.x => 3.10.x)? Thanks. On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > I was never able to go from 3.6.x to 3.7.x without downtime. Then > 3.7.x did not work well for me, so I stuck with 3.6.x until recently. > I went from 3.6.x to 3.10.x but downtime was scheduled. > > Diego > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Yong Tse...

.... HTH, Diego On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Yong Tseng <yongtw123 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Diego, > > Just to clarify, so did you do an offline upgrade with an existing cluster > (3.6.x => 3.10.x)? > Thanks. > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I was never able to go from 3.6.x to 3.7.x without downtime. Then >> 3.7.x did not work well for me, so I stuck with 3.6.x until recently. >> I went from 3.6.x to 3.10.x but downtime was scheduled. >> >> Diego >> >> On Fr...

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > You should first upgrade servers and then clients. New servers can > > understand old clients, but it is not easy for old servers to understand > new > > clients in case it started doing something new. > > But isn't that the reas...

I am planning to set up a small compute farm consisting of x86 notebooks on a switched ethernet lan. These only have one nic and limited disk, so that I need to import a data partition from an external file server. For this purpose I'd like to use a w98 PC that has access to internet over dsl. I envisage connecting all machines to the ethernet switch using 10/100 links. The ip addresses would

...I added brick, turned volume to replica 3 with arbiter and got very strange issue I will mail to this list in a moment... Thanks. -ps On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > You should first upgrade servers and then clients. New servers can >> > understand old clients, but it is not easy for old servers to understand >> > new >> > clients in case it started doing something new. >...

I have just finished replacing a client's Windows / Exchange / IIS setup here with Samba / [Postfix, UW Imap] / Apache and I've run into an issue. In this setup, Samba acts as PDC, so there are NO WINDOWS SERVERS - only win clients. One of the apps that they run seems to explicitly require that the user own the folder that they are saving to. In their prior setup, this was easy, as

...cow2 -rw-------. 2 root root 3792371712 May 9 16:15 kworker01.qcow2 -rw-------. 2 root root 3792371712 May 10 11:20 kworker02.qcow2 [root at glusterp2 gv0]# So some files have re-synced but not the kworker machines network activity has stopped. On 10 May 2018 at 12:05, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > Show us output from: gluster v status > > It should be easy to fix. Stop gluster daemon on that node, mount the > brick, start gluster daemon again. > > Check: gluster v status > > Does it show the brick up? > > HTH, > > Diego > >...

Gandalf, SIGKILL (killall -9 glusterfsd) did not stop I/O after few minutes. SIGTERM on the other hand causes crash, but this time it is not read-only remount, but around 10 IOPS tops and 2 IOPS on average. -ps On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > I currently only have a Windows 2012 R2 server VM in testing on top of > the gluster storage, so I will have to take some time to provision a > couple Linux VMs with both ext4 and XFS to see what happens on those. > > The Windows server VM is OK with killall...

Hi! I have been reading for about two weeks (maybe I'm reading on the wrong places). I have found as many documents as one could expect describind how to build a LDAPv3 server, or how to build samba with ldap. This far, I have failed, and have a BIG confution in the order in wich the things should go: In one document, they recommend this: samba -> ldap -> sasl -> kerberos

...May 9 16:15 kworker01.qcow2 > -rw-------. 2 root root 3792371712 May 10 11:20 kworker02.qcow2 > [root at glusterp2 gv0]# > > So some files have re-synced but not the kworker machines network > activity has stopped. > > > > On 10 May 2018 at 12:05, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Show us output from: gluster v status >> >> It should be easy to fix. Stop gluster daemon on that node, mount the >> brick, start gluster daemon again. >> >> Check: gluster v status >> >> Does it show the brick up? >...

...t; -rw-------. 2 root root 3792371712 May 10 11:20 kworker02.qcow2 >> [root at glusterp2 gv0]# >> >> So some files have re-synced but not the kworker machines network >> activity has stopped. >> >> >> >> On 10 May 2018 at 12:05, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Show us output from: gluster v status >>> >>> It should be easy to fix. Stop gluster daemon on that node, mount the >>> brick, start gluster daemon again. >>> >>> Check: gluster v status >>> >>...

> > You should first upgrade servers and then clients. New servers can > understand old clients, but it is not easy for old servers to understand new > clients in case it started doing something new. But isn't that the reason op-version exists? So that regardless of client/server mix, nobody tries to do "new" things above the current op-version? He is not changing mayor

...op on VM. Reboot caused I/O errors after maybe 20 seconds since issuing the command. I will check the servers console during reboot to see if the VM errors appear just after the power cycle and will try to crash the VM after killall again... -ps On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > I would prefer the behavior was different to what it is of I/O stopping. > The argument I heard for the long 42 second time out was that MTBF on a > server was high, and that the client reconnection operation was *costly*. > Those were arguments to *not* chang...