search for: digiart

Hi; I'm having some trouble to comunicate with my just bought (08/17/15) Ups. According to SOLIS(8): SUPPORTED HARDWARE This driver has been tested with : Solis 1000 VA Solis 1500 VA Solis 2000 VA Solis 3000 VA Back-UPS BZ1200-BR Back-UPS BZ2200BI-BR So solis is the one to go for. Here is my scenario: SW: nut-2.7.3 (compiled from ports) OS: FreeBSD

On Sep 11, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Mario Lobo <mlobo at digiart.art.br> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 22:31:08 -0400 > Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sep 9, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Mario Lobo <mlobo at digiart.art.br> wrote: >>> >>> By the constance of header and footer bytes, I think someth...

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:25:54 -0400 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > @rpvelloso on Github suggested some changes (driver version v0.64) > that should help with the initial sync: > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/debc8e0280ea4de9a0db5ca34aa66705b285f61f > > It's the solis_debug branch on Github. > > Does that help? I'm concerned

On Aug 20, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Mario Lobo <mlobo at digiart.art.br> wrote: > > ** cuaU0 > > [>]/usr/local/libexec/nut/solis -D -a lobos -u root > Network UPS Tools - Microsol Solis UPS driver 0.62 (2.7.3) > 0.000000 debug level is '1' > 21.065536 Solis not detected! aborting ... It looks like /dev/cuaU0 is th...

On Aug 21, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Mario Lobo <mlobo at digiart.art.br> wrote: > >> Not sure what to look for yet. It might be easier to add in the debug >> calls to the source code-- can you try building NUT from source? If >> you installed via the ports tree (as opposed to binary packages), you >> should have most of the depende...

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mario Lobo <mlobo at digiart.art.br> wrote: > I know the battery is fully charged and that the load is more than 7.2%. > > The battery voltage seems correct. Mario, I realize some of the variables are not yet correct, but is this better than before? I would like to merge the solis_debug branch in to the master br...

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:09:03 -0400 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 21, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Mario Lobo <mlobo at digiart.art.br> wrote: > > > >> Not sure what to look for yet. It might be easier to add in the > >> debug calls to the source code-- can you try building NUT from > >> source? If you installed via the ports tree (as opposed to binary > >> packages), you should...

On Aug 23, 2015, at 6:26 PM, Mario Lobo <mlobo at digiart.art.br> wrote: > > I hope it helps! It is a bit easier to read than the ktrace output. Here are the bytes received, without the other messages: Network UPS Tools - Microsol Solis UPS driver 0.63 (2.7.3.1) CommReceive: RecPack: (25 bytes) => 00 17 91 49 5e 5e bc fe bb 46 88 ac 1b 0a a...

Turns out another user reported the same issue with a slightly different model: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/231 <https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/231> The "stty -f /dev/cuaU0 raw" trick should help, but I am confused as to why FreeBSD has different "raw" settings than what is set up at the same time as the baud rate:

Test -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things."

Hi Charles; I tried both of your suggestions: 1) run stty -f /dev/cuaU0 raw jusbefore running solis 2) Unplug/plug, and run solis right after. The problem still persists. [~]>stty -a -f /dev/cuaU0 speed 9600 baud; 0 rows; 0 columns; lflags: icanon isig iexten echo echoe -echok echoke -echonl echoctl -echoprt -altwerase -noflsh -tostop -flusho -pendin -nokerninfo -extproc