Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "difoobar".
Did you mean:
_foobar
2012 Oct 05
1
[LLVMdev] question
You should probably think of the DIFooBar constructors like reinterpret-casts, not
"go find the thing I actually want" functions. If you hand DICompileUnit() a node
that is not a compile-unit metadata node, it's not going to tell you that you goofed.
If you _did_ have a CU metadata node, then DICompileUnit's getDire...
2012 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] question
Hmmm, but it has a getDirectory function.
-G
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's because instructions have a location associated with them, not
> a compile unit.
>
> -eric
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:46 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I used DILocation instead of DICompileUnit and
2012 Oct 04
2
[LLVMdev] question
That's because instructions have a location associated with them, not
a compile unit.
-eric
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:46 PM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote:
> I used DILocation instead of DICompileUnit and it works. Hmmm, interesting.
>
> George
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:33 AM, George Baah <georgebaah at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here is