search for: diflagnoreturn

Hello, In regard to the review request https://reviews.llvm.org/D74470, I am trying to move five of the DIFlags to DISPFlag for the moment namely DIFlagExplicit, DIFlagPrototyped, DIFlagNoReturn, DIFlagThunk, DIFlagAllCallsDescribed. The llvm ir format for DISubprogram currently has backword compatibility where the isLocal, isDefinition, virtuality, isOptimized and SPFlags are mutually exclusive. My question is, is it a good idea to remove the booleans support'(isLocal, isDefinition) a...

...s to DISPFlag. Hi Chirag, On 20.2.20. 07:51, Chirag Patel via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello, > >   > > In regard to the review request https://reviews.llvm.org/D74470, > > I am trying to move five of the DIFlags to DISPFlag for the moment namely DIFlagExplicit, DIFlagPrototyped, DIFlagNoReturn, DIFlagThunk, DIFlagAllCallsDescribed. > > The llvm ir format for DISubprogram currently has backword compatibility where the isLocal, isDefinition, virtuality, isOptimized and SPFlags are mutually exclusive. > > My question is, > > is it a good idea to remove the booleans supp...

...t; On 20.2.20. 07:51, Chirag Patel via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hello, >> >>   >> >> In regard to the review request https://reviews.llvm.org/D74470, >> >> I am trying to move five of the DIFlags to DISPFlag for the moment namely DIFlagExplicit, DIFlagPrototyped, DIFlagNoReturn, DIFlagThunk, DIFlagAllCallsDescribed. >> >> The llvm ir format for DISubprogram currently has backword compatibility where the isLocal, isDefinition, virtuality, isOptimized and SPFlags are mutually exclusive. >> >> My question is, >> >> is it a good idea to rem...