Displaying 20 results from an estimated 446 matches for "diffy".
Did you mean:
diff
2007 Sep 21
4
Diffie Hellman key exchange algorithms
A few questions regarding the OpenSSH support for the Diffie Hellman key exchange algorithms:
(1) Are the diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256",
"diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1"
, "diffie-hellman-group14-sha1" "diffie-hellman-group1-sha1" (as
defined in RFCs 4253 and RFC 4419) the complete list of key exchange
algorithms supported by OpenSSH?
(2) Is there a
2020 Jul 24
2
Openssl 3
Anyone trying openssl 3 against openssh?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Put more trust in nobility of character than in an oath. -Solon
2019 Feb 14
2
Can we disable diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 by default?
I ask because the removal of diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 happened
accidently in 7.8 due to a mistake in a change to readconf.c. I noticed
this and filed a bug about it along with a patch to fix readconf.c to use
KEX_CLIENT_* like it used to:
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/1b9dd4aa
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2967
Its clear the removal was unintentional
2019 Feb 14
2
Can we disable diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 by default?
Can we disable diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 too?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:23 PM Mark D. Baushke <mdb at juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> The short answer is YES.
>
> Jon DeVree <nuxi at vault24.org> writes:
>
> > I ask because the removal of diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 happened
> > accidently in 7.8 due to a mistake in a change to
2019 Jan 19
4
Can we disable diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 by default?
I'm not sure if collision resistance is required for DH key
derivation, but generally, SHA-1 is on its way out. If it's possible
(if there's not a very large percentage of servers that do not support
anything newer), it should be disabled.
2018 Mar 06
2
Failed connections 7.6 to 5.2
Trying to connect to a Dell iDRAC 6. The iDRAC reports it is running
OpenSSH 5.2.
From Fedora Linux 20 with OpenSSH 6.4p1, connections succeed.
From Fedora Linux 23 with OpenSSH 7.2p2, connections succeed.
From Fedora Linux 27 with OpenSSH 7.6p1, connections fail prior to
prompting for a password. The message is, "Received disconnect from (IP
address) port 22:11: Logged out." Trying
2016 Nov 08
4
one host only: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal
Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> gv harry> ssh -vv 2x
>>
>> OpenSSH_7.3p1-hpn14v11, OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016
>
> this is a third-party modified version of OpenSSH. Can you reproduce
> the problem with a stock OpenSSH from the source from
2014 Oct 10
3
[Bug 2291] New: ssh -Q kex lists diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 twice
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2291
Bug ID: 2291
Summary: ssh -Q kex lists diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 twice
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.7p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: sftp-server
Assignee:
2015 May 22
3
Weak DH primes and openssh
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:27:01, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote:
> Note that PuTTY does do Diffie-Hellman Group Exchange, but until very
> recently (ie after their 0.64 release) they didn't do the one that was
> actually standardized in RFC4419. OpenSSH recently removed support for
> that non-standard one and as a result we don't offer DHGEX to PuTTY
>
2007 Jan 08
0
How to remove group1 and group14 from OpenSSH..
Hello everyone.. I am fairly new to the patching format.. so I just decided to post a basic info
about how to remove group1 and group14 diffie key exchange in OpenSSH.
I know that they are listed as required in RFC 4253 but I don't want a client to have the choice
to use a 1024 bit prime for the key exchange. If someone is getting into my system.. they should
upgrade to a new client. I am a
2016 Nov 08
4
one host only: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal
all but one lan host (gv)can ssh connect to host 2x
Included windows 10, several linux. 2x is a solaris host.
That problem host (gv) can connect to all others but 2x.
2x can connect to all other encluding the problem host (gv)
So gv ssh to 2x throws this error:
ssh_dispatch_run_fatal: Connection to 192.168.1.42 port 22: incorrect
signature.
192.168.1.42 is 2x. So incoming ssh from gv to 2x
2018 Nov 23
2
Debian Stretch 9.6: openssh-server and old dropbear client don't work togheter
Il giorno gio 22 nov 2018 alle ore 21:24 Stuart Henderson
<stu at spacehopper.org> ha scritto:
>
> On 2018/11/22 19:55, owl700 at gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi, I have compatibility issues with the latest version of
> > openssh-server and an old dropbear client, the dopbear client stops at
> > preauth
> >
> > ov 22 14:34:03 myhostname sshd[3905]: debug1: Client
2019 Feb 15
4
Can we disable diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 by default?
Also, how are default moduli shipped with OpenSSH for use in
diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1/sha256 chosen? Are they chosen
randomly by developers or are they chosen for security properties? If
they are random, why not use moduli from RFC 7919 instead, like
Mozilla recommends?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 3:48 AM Mark D. Baushke <mdb at juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Yegor Ievlev <koops1997
2020 Jun 19
9
[Bug 3184] New: Unable to add deprecated KexAlgorithms back for host via config file
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3184
Bug ID: 3184
Summary: Unable to add deprecated KexAlgorithms back for host
via config file
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 8.2p1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: ssh
2024 Sep 21
1
diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256 group size concerns and request
Hello all,
I have recently had cause to dig a little into the specifics of how
diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256 group sizes work.
The belief in the wild, perpetuated by multiple sources of logjam
mediation papers and also Andras Stribnik's very influential piece
"Secure Secure Shell", is that server operators can force the use of a
minimum group size by removing moduli
2016 Nov 08
4
one host only: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal
Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote:
>> Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> gv harry> ssh -vv 2x
>>>>
>>>>
2002 Mar 12
0
nlme versus aov with Error()
Hi all,
I computed a two way anova with two within-subjects fixed effects: diffi
(2 levels) and cond (4 levels) and one random effect subject, and one
dependent variable accuracy:
summary(aov(accuracy ~ diffi*cond + Error(sub/(diffi+cond)),
data=phd.df))
Error: sub
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Residuals 4 136.549 34.137
Error: sub:diffi
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value
2005 Jun 16
1
Bug report: first_kex_packet_follows behaviour seems wrong
Hello,
It seems to me the algorithm negotiation of the transport layer has a bug,
it does not follow the specification of draft-ietf-secsh-transport-24, page
19, where the behaviour of first_kex_packet_follows is specified.
I've got an ssh client that sends an SSH_MSG_KEXINIT message and specifies
only 'diffie-hellman-group1-sha1' as key exchange algorithm. It sets
2015 Dec 11
16
[Bug 2515] New: Implement diffie-hellman-group{14,15,16)-sha256
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2515
Bug ID: 2515
Summary: Implement diffie-hellman-group{14,15,16)-sha256
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: ASSIGNED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: ssh
Assignee: dtucker at
2009 May 23
0
RMTPE specification
Here is a cleanroom specification of RTMPE which has been documented
from rtmpdump v1.6 source code. updates will be at:
http://lkcl.net/rtmp/RTMPE.txt
it is from the perspective of a client however implementing from the
perspective of a server is a trivial matter.
please distribute freely and widely.
please implement and distribute even wider, in both client and server.
note: absolutely no