search for: diblob

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "diblob".

2016 Mar 30
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for >>>> non-type template parameters? >>>> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >>>> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within >>>> the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference >>>> at emission time. >>>> >>>> Why break up the types at all? >>>> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO >>>> that won’t be huge in size. W...
2016 Mar 30
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...>>> How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for >>> non-type template parameters? >>> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >>> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within >>> the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference >>> at emission time. >>> >>> Why break up the types at all? >>> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO >>> that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types...
2016 Mar 30
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...See below) >> >> How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for >> non-type template parameters? >> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within >> the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference >> at emission time. >> >> Why break up the types at all? >> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO >> that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to...
2016 Mar 30
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...references in DWARF2 or global relocations for >>>>> non-type template parameters? >>>>> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >>>>> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset >>>>> within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the >>>>> reference at emission time. >>>>> >>>>> Why break up the types at all? >>>>> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for >>>>> LTO that won’...
2016 Mar 30
1
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...le relocations for the offsets. (See below) > > How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? > * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. > * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. > > Why break up the types at all? > * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to parse debug information to l...
2016 Mar 30
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...tions for the offsets. (See below) > > How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type > template parameters? > * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. > * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within > the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference > at emission time. > > Why break up the types at all? > * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO > that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to parse > debug in...
2016 Mar 30
14
RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...references and module relocations for the offsets. (See below) How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. Why break up the types at all? * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to parse debug information to link two modules...
2016 Mar 30
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...references and module relocations for the offsets. (See below) How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. Why break up the types at all? * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to parse debug information to link two modules...
2016 Mar 30
5
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...s. (See below) > > > > How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type > template parameters? > > * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. > > * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within > the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference > at emission time. > > > > Why break up the types at all? > > * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO > that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to pars...
2016 Apr 01
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...; >> How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for >> non-type template parameters? >> >> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >> >> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within >> the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference >> at emission time. >> >> >> >> Why break up the types at all? >> >> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO >> that won’t be huge in size. We break up th...
2016 Apr 01
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...fsets. (See below) > > > > How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? > > * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. > > * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. > > > > Why break up the types at all? > > * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to parse deb...
2016 Apr 27
2
RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...See below) >> >> How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for >> non-type template parameters? >> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within >> the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference >> at emission time. >> >> Why break up the types at all? >> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO >> that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to...
2016 Apr 01
1
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...>>> How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? >>> >>> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >>> >>> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. >>> >>> >>> >>> Why break up the types at all? >>> >>> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break...
2016 Mar 31
3
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...references and module relocations for the offsets. (See below) How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. Why break up the types at all? * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to parse debug information to link two modules...
2016 Apr 01
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...;> >> >> How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? >> >> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >> >> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. >> >> >> >> Why break up the types at all? >> >> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we...
2016 Mar 31
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...e relocations for the offsets. (See below) > > How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? > * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. > * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. > > Why break up the types at all? > * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to parse debug information to...
2016 Mar 31
1
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...s. (See below) > > > > How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type > template parameters? > > * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. > > * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within > the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference > at emission time. > > > > Why break up the types at all? > > * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO > that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to pars...
2016 May 11
2
RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
...or the offsets. (See below) >> >> How will we handle references in DWARF2 or global relocations for non-type template parameters? >> * We can use a “relocation” metadata as part of the format. >> * Representable as a tuple that has the DIType and the offset within the DIBlob as where to write the final relocation/offset for the reference at emission time. >> >> Why break up the types at all? >> * To enable non-debug format aware linking and type uniquing for LTO that won’t be huge in size. We break up the types so we don’t need to parse debug info...