Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "diagnostickind".
2008 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r58509 - in /cfe/trunk: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticKinds.def lib/AST/Expr.cpp lib/Sema/Sema.h lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp lib/Sema/SemaInherit.cpp lib/Sema/SemaInherit.h lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp test/SemaCXX/condition.cpp
On 2008-11-04, at 08:12, Sebastian Redl wrote:
> Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Sebastian Redl wrote:
>>>> svn help cl
>>>>
>>>> [ runs away, much the same way someone that throws a lighted match
>>>> into a pool of gasoline ]
Probably wise.
>>> "cl": unknown command.
>>
>> From svn 1.5:
2015 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Out-of-source subclassses vs. LLVM's RTTI system
.... None of the existing subclasses of
*DiangosticInfo* seems quite appropriate for my needs, so I wanted to
create my own subclass, outside of the LLVM source.
So I'm stuck between (a) wanting all of my code to reside outside of the
LLVM source, and (b) being obligated (I think) to modify the
*DiagnosticKind* enum.
Thanks, Christian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150624/25dbf1ec/attachment.html>
2015 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Out-of-source subclassses vs. LLVM's RTTI system
...Tobias
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
> Maybe have a look at Polly's lib/Analysis/ScopDetectionDiagnostic.cpp and
> lib/Analysis/ScopDetection.cpp. We use LLVM's diagnostics in a loadable
> module without modifying LLVM's DiagnosticKind enum.
>
Thanks very much for the suggestion. It looks like Polly's approach is the
same as my initial approach: just call the most-appropriate-seeming
llvm::emit...Remark...(...) method.
I can use that as a fallback approach, if needed. But I was hoping
implement a function for emitting...