search for: dhananjay

Great news. Is this planned to be published in next release? Il 29 mag 2017 3:27 PM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha scritto: > Thanks for that update. Very happy to hear it ran fine without any issues. > :) > > Yeah so you can ignore those 'No such file or directory' errors. They > represent a transient state where DHT in the client process is yet t...

Great, thanks! Il 5 giu 2017 6:49 AM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha scritto: > The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0 > > -Krutika > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < > gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Great news. >> Is this p...

...t; > > > Apologies for the ping :) > > > > -Gencer. > > > > *From:* gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces@ > gluster.org] *On Behalf Of *gencer at gencgiyen.com > *Sent:* Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:06 AM > > *To:* 'Krutika Dhananjay' <kdhananj at redhat.com> > *Cc:* 'gluster-user' <gluster-users at gluster.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Very slow performance on Sharded GlusterFS > > > > Hi Krutika, > > > > I also did one more test. I re-created another volume (single...

...the multiple e-mails. I just want to make sure that I provided correct results for the tests. Thanks, Gencer. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of gencer at gencgiyen.com Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 10:34 AM To: 'Krutika Dhananjay' <kdhananj at redhat.com> Cc: 'gluster-user' <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Very slow performance on Sharded GlusterFS Krutika, I?m sorry I forgot to add logs. I attached them now. Thanks, Gencer. From: gluster-users-bounces at...

...out whats the issue may? I am awaiting your reply with four eyes :) Apologies for the ping :) -Gencer. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of gencer at gencgiyen.com Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:06 AM To: 'Krutika Dhananjay' <kdhananj at redhat.com> Cc: 'gluster-user' <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Very slow performance on Sharded GlusterFS Hi Krutika, I also did one more test. I re-created another volume (single volume. Old one destroyed-deleted) then do 2...

The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0 -Krutika On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > Great news. > Is this planned to be published in next release? > > Il 29 mag 2017 3:27 PM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha > scritto: > >> Thanks for that update. Very happy to hear it ran fine without any >> issues. :) >> >> Yeah so you can ignore those 'No such file or directory' errors. They >> represent a transient state where DHT i...

...wo nodes. I see up to 102MB/s. Is there anything I can do to optimize more? Or is it last stop? Note: I deleted all files again and reformat then re-create volume with shard then mount it. Tried with 16MB, 32MB and 512MB shard sizes. Results are equal. Thanks, Gencer. From: Krutika Dhananjay [mailto:kdhananj at redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:30 AM To: gencer at gencgiyen.com Cc: gluster-user <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Very slow performance on Sharded GlusterFS What if you disabled eager lock and run your test again on the sharded...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkicktech at gmail.com> > To: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> > Cc: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com>, "gluster-user" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 1:40:42 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Slow performance of gluster volume > > Did not upgrade yet gluster. I am still using 3.8.12. Only the mentio...

Krutika, I?m sorry I forgot to add logs. I attached them now. Thanks, Gencer. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of gencer at gencgiyen.com Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 10:27 AM To: 'Krutika Dhananjay' <kdhananj at redhat.com> Cc: 'gluster-user' <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Very slow performance on Sharded GlusterFS Ki Krutika, After that setting: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/ddfile bs=1G count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 10...

...3f5-c769-44b9-a087-dc51fc21412e) [No such file or directory] > > > > Although the process went smooth, i will run another extensive test > tomorrow just to be sure. > > -- > > Respectfully > *Mahdi A. Mahdi* > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> > *Sent:* Monday, May 29, 2017 9:20:29 AM > > *To:* Mahdi Adnan > *Cc:* gluster-user; Gandalf Corvotempesta; Lindsay Mathieson; Kevin > Lemonnier > *Subject:* Re: Rebalance + VM corruption - current status and request for > feedback > > Hi,...

Great to hear! ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkicktech at gmail.com> > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> > Cc: "gluster-user" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 7:01:00 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Slow performance of gluster volume > > Following changes resolved the perf issue: > > Added the...

...Thank you. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Ben Turner <bturner at redhat.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkicktech at gmail.com> > > To: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> > > Cc: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com>, "gluster-user" < > gluster-users at gluster.org> > > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 1:40:42 AM > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Slow performance of gluster volume > > > > Did not upgrade yet gluster. I am still usin...

...e such performance boost? I will try to upgrade and check difference also. On Sep 11, 2017 2:45 AM, "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> wrote: Great to hear! ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkicktech at gmail.com> > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> > Cc: "gluster-user" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 7:01:00 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Slow performance of gluster volume > > Following changes resolved the perf issue: > > Added the o...

What if you disabled eager lock and run your test again on the sharded configuration along with the profile output? # gluster volume set <VOL> cluster.eager-lock off -Krutika On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks. I think reusing the same volume was the cause of lack of IO > distribution. > The latest profile output looks much more realistic and in line with i > would expect. > > Let me analyse the numbers a bit and get back. > > -Kruti...

...reversed) > > > > > > And this example have generated a profile which I also attached to this > e-mail. > > > > Is there anything that I can try? I am open to all kind of suggestions. > > > > Thanks, > > Gencer. > > > > *From:* Krutika Dhananjay [mailto:kdhananj at redhat.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 4, 2017 9:39 AM > > *To:* gencer at gencgiyen.com > *Cc:* gluster-user <gluster-users at gluster.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Very slow performance on Sharded GlusterFS > > > > Hi Gencer, > > I j...

...d performs 250~ mb/s but shard gives 77mb. I attached two logs (shard and stripe logs) Note: I also noticed that you said ?order?. Do you mean when we create via volume set we have to make an order for bricks? I thought gluster handles (and do the math) itself. Gencer From: Krutika Dhananjay [mailto:kdhananj at redhat.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:50 PM To: gencer at gencgiyen.com Cc: gluster-user <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Very slow performance on Sharded GlusterFS Just noticed that the way you have configured your brick order during vo...

...only at 70Mbps. Same thing was observed with different qos rates for class 1:2, outbound traffic through bond was very less than the rate specified in the tc command. Is getting poor performance after running tc over a bond is a known issue? Please help me with this issue. Thanks and regards, ---Dhananjay.

...lid argument: client [Invalid argument] Do I need to upgrade all nodes before I attempt to start the gluster services? I reverted the first node back to 3.8 at the moment and all restored. Also tests with eager lock disabled did not make any difference. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> wrote: > Do you see any improvement with 3.11.1 as that has a patch that improves > perf for this kind of a workload > > Also, could you disable eager-lock and check if that helps? I see that max > time is being spent in acquiring locks. > > -Kru...

...lid argument: client [Invalid argument] Do I need to upgrade all nodes before I attempt to start the gluster services? I reverted the first node back to 3.8 at the moment and all restored. Also tests with eager lock disabled did not make any difference. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> wrote: > Do you see any improvement with 3.11.1 as that has a patch that improves > perf for this kind of a workload > > Also, could you disable eager-lock and check if that helps? I see that max > time is being spent in acquiring locks. > > -Kru...

Hi, Sorry i did't confirm the results sooner. Yes, it's working fine without issues for me. If anyone else can confirm so we can be sure it's 100% resolved. -- Respectfully Mahdi A. Mahdi ________________________________ From: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:17:40 AM To: Mahdi Adnan Cc: gluster-user; Gandalf Corvotempesta; Lindsay Mathieson; Kevin Lemonnier Subject: Re: Rebalance + VM corruption - current status and request for feedback Hi Mahdi, Did you get a chance to verify this fix agai...