Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "dgits".
Did you mean:
dgit
2017 May 04
2
Bug#861660: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"):
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:59:18PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Should I put jessie-security in the debian/changelog and dgit push it
> > (ie, from many people's pov, dput it) ?
>
> Yes, the distribution line should be jessie-security, but please send
> a
2018 Aug 23
3
git workflow, redux
Summary:
I have tried the packaging-only repo and I really don't like it at
all. I don't know how anyone copes with this - such hard work!
IMO we should switch to git-debrebase. (As an alternative, if
you don't trust git-debrebase because it's my own tool, gbp pq
would be better, too, even though it's not as good as git-debrebase.)
Particularly, now that we have more people
2018 Oct 05
4
Entirely new Xen packaging
I have now finished totally rewriting the Xen package in Debian, from
scratch. Amazingly as soon as I got a package which was lintian-clean
and would install, it worked first time !
I have generated 18 patches to go upstream which I have sent to
xen-devel. There are two more, xenstore ABI patches, which need a bit
of tidying up.
There is still room for improvement but it is now clearly ready
2018 Aug 24
2
git workflow, redux
Hans van Kranenburg writes ("Re: git workflow, redux"):
> On 08/23/2018 08:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I think git-debrebase is going to be easier for all these things than
> > the current approach.
>
> Ok, let's try it! Thanks a lot for doing the above writeup.
Great, thanks. (I hope it's OK that I have snipped most of your
responses to the discussion,
2017 May 04
3
Bug#861660: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"):
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:06:07PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I have fixed these in stretch but the jessie package remains unfixed.
> > I think I may be able to find some backports somewhere. Would that be
> > useful ? Is anyone else working on this ?
>
>
2017 Jun 20
4
Updated Xen packages for XSA 216..225
FYI I will have an upload ready RSN. Where should I send it ?
Matthew Vernon has offered to test my amd64 binaries. I will test the
i386 packages myself.
Ian.
2018 Apr 30
4
debian-xen git workflow
Hi Ian, team,
In the week of Feb 23 (time flies!:), we had a very productive day
\o/ working on the stretch security/stable package and some irc
discussions in oftc #debian-xen which ended with an open end.
Ian, you were a bit surprised that 1) my debian-xen repo started with an
import of a 4.8 package 2) it was not a git-pbuilder style repo with
upstream source included, and asked me to at
2017 May 04
4
Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"):
> Yes, the distribution line should be jessie-security, but please send
> a debdiff to team at security.debian.org for a quick review before
> uploading (I have no idea whether dgit supports security-master).
Here is the proposed debdiff (actually, a git diff) for xen in jessie.
My
2018 Oct 06
2
Entirely new Xen packaging
This is awesome! What needs to be done before this can make it to
unstable? I’d love to help if there’s anything I can do.
Stephen
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 8:00 PM Hans van Kranenburg <hans at knorrie.org> wrote:
> On 10/05/2018 08:04 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I have now finished totally rewriting the Xen package in Debian, from
> > scratch. Amazingly as soon as I got a
2017 May 04
2
Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214
Ian Jackson writes ("64bit PV guest breakout [XSA-213]"):
> Source: xen
> Version: 4.4.1-9
> Severity: important
> Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream
>
> See
> https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-213.html
Ian Jackson writes ("grant transfer allows PV guest to elevate privileges [XSA-214]"):
> Source: xen
> Version: 4.4.1-9
> Severity:
2008 Nov 03
0
asterisk src=dst
Hi all
I saw in the CDR stocked in mysql as well as those in the csv file that
some time, the src field is the same as the dst field which is the
extension.
When does it happens.
Here, we have 4 dgits extensions and most of the time the dst field is
the extension and the src field is the 10 digit customer phone number.
Do you know when does this happens ??
Thanks
Ruddy Gbaguidi
http://www.astblog.com
2010 Apr 16
0
memory leak observed with valgrind on CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
Hi All,
Not sure exactly a memory leak or not. I was porting my nagios from
Redhat 7.3 to CentOS 5.4 and I observed the memory usage was gradually
increasing on the new centos box.
When I ran all my perl plugins with Valgrind -3.2.1, all the plugins
complained about a memory leak. Not sure if it's a leak or if its fault
with valgrind way of evaluating things.
I have attached