search for: devices_containing_partit

...ange is wrong. > * useful about devices which just contain partitions, so we also > - * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices > - * by using part-to-dev. > + * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices. > *) > - let devices_containing_partitions = List.fold_left ( > - fun set part -> > - StringSet.add (Devsparts.part_to_dev part) set > - ) StringSet.empty partitions in > - let devices = List.filter ( > - fun dev -> > - not (StringSet.mem dev devices_containing_partitions) > - ) devices in &...

...owever vfs-type will fail to tell us anything * useful about devices which just contain partitions, so we also - * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices - * by using part-to-dev. + * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices. *) - let devices_containing_partitions = List.fold_left ( - fun set part -> - StringSet.add (Devsparts.part_to_dev part) set - ) StringSet.empty partitions in - let devices = List.filter ( - fun dev -> - not (StringSet.mem dev devices_containing_partitions) - ) devices in + let device_without_partitions dev...

...* useful about devices which just contain partitions, so we also >> - * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices >> - * by using part-to-dev. >> + * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices. >> *) >> - let devices_containing_partitions = List.fold_left ( >> - fun set part -> >> - StringSet.add (Devsparts.part_to_dev part) set >> - ) StringSet.empty partitions in >> - let devices = List.filter ( >> - fun dev -> >> - not (StringSet.mem dev devices_containing_partitions...

...see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type will fail to tell us anything - * useful about devices which just contain partitions, so we also - * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices - * by using part-to-dev. - *) - let devices_containing_partitions = List.fold_left ( - fun set part -> - StringSet.add (Devsparts.part_to_dev part) set - ) StringSet.empty partitions in - let devices = List.filter ( - fun dev -> - not (StringSet.mem dev devices_containing_partitions) - ) devices in - - (* Use vfs-type to check for fi...

...see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type will fail to tell us anything - * useful about devices which just contain partitions, so we also - * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices - * by using part-to-dev. - *) - let devices_containing_partitions = List.fold_left ( - fun set part -> - StringSet.add (Devsparts.part_to_dev part) set - ) StringSet.empty partitions in - let devices = List.filter ( - fun dev -> - not (StringSet.mem dev devices_containing_partitions) - ) devices in - - (* Use vfs-type to check for fi...

Before I rush to change something I request your comments on the subject. Let me know what do you think and if it does make sense. The issue: guesfs_list_filesystems is inconsistent in its output. For, example, it filters out partitioned physical devices but doesn't do the same for MD devices. More over, according to its name and API documentation guestfs_list_filesystem should return

...see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type will fail to tell us anything - * useful about devices which just contain partitions, so we also - * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices - * by using part-to-dev. - *) - let devices_containing_partitions = List.fold_left ( - fun set part -> - StringSet.add (Devsparts.part_to_dev part) set - ) StringSet.empty partitions in - let devices = List.filter ( - fun dev -> - not (StringSet.mem dev devices_containing_partitions) - ) devices in + let mds = List.filter check_devic...

...see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type will fail to tell us anything - * useful about devices which just contain partitions, so we also - * get the list of partitions and exclude the corresponding devices - * by using part-to-dev. - *) - let devices_containing_partitions = List.fold_left ( - fun set part -> - StringSet.add (Devsparts.part_to_dev part) set - ) StringSet.empty partitions in - let devices = List.filter ( - fun dev -> - not (StringSet.mem dev devices_containing_partitions) - ) devices in + let mds = List.filter check_devic...

Initial discussion is here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00188.html. v2 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00246.html. v3 comparing to v2 is just a rebase with slightly changed commits comments.

Instead of parsing 'parted' output OCaml implementation relies on the following facts: 1. The function is applicable for MBR partitions only (as noted in documentation and as function name suggests). 2. An attempt to call the function for non-MBR partition fails with "part_get_mbr_part_type can only be used on MBR Partitions" error and NULL is returned. 3. MBR partition table

This patch series addresses comments after v6 series review. Mykola Ivanets (6): daemon: Changing the way that we detect if a device contains partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Ignore partitioned MD devices. tests: list-filesystems command ignores partitioned MD devices. daemon: list-filesystems: Change the way we filter out LDM partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Filter out

This patch series: 1. Addresses comments from last review: part_get_mbr_part_type doesn't break original implementation in C. 2. Rebased on top of master and little bit refactored for readability. Mykola Ivanets (1): tests: md: Test guestfish list-filesystems command skips partitioned md devices. Nikolay Ivanets (2): daemon: Reimplement 'part_get_mbr_part_type' API in

v8: - Rebased on top of master. v7: - Addresses comments after v6 series review. v6: - Addresses comments after v5 series review. - Large commit is splitted to more granular commits for better code review. v5: - Addresses comments after v4 series review (part_get_mbr_part_type doesn't break original implementation in C). - Rebased on top of master and little bit refactored for

This patch series: 1. Addresses comments from v5 series review 2. Large commit is splitted to more granular commits for better code review. Mykola Ivanets (6): daemon: Changing the way that we detect if a device contains partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Ignore partitioned MD devices. tests: list-filesystems command ignores partitioned MD devices. daemon: list-filesystems: Change

I think this fixes everything mentioned: - Added the Optgroups module as suggested. - Remove command temporary files. - Replace command ~flags with ?fold_stdout_on_stderr. - Nest _with_mounted function. - Rebase & retest. Rich.

v1 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html v1 -> v2: - Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally through the patch