search for: devfsadm

I have a number of systems running solaris10 and i see the package and binary for dtrace installed however whenever we try to run anything we get this error dtrace: failed to initialize dtrace: DTrace device not available on system the only system in which i dont have this error is the development server that has the full solaris 10 install while others are minimized, do i need additional

Author: cth Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 855003e47284a1376b3ce65d9f3629b60711fed8 Log message: 6317254 missing lock_dev()/unlock_dev() in devfsadm event_handler() Files: update: usr/src/cmd/devfsadm/devfsadm.c

...e driver and pkgadd the driver again after a dom U restart. Pseudo Driver installation is done the following way: # pkgadd -d ... SUNWegcff that adds /etc/devlink.tab: type=ddi_pseudo;name=ffmod ffmod\M0 /etc/minor_perm: clone:ffmod 0600 root sys and does /usr/sbin/add_drv -v ffmod /usr/sbin/devfsadm -i ffmod # modinfo -c | grep ffmod 194 2 ffmod LOADED/INSTALLED # # ls -al /dev/*ff* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 29 Sep 11 09:20 /dev/ffmodctl -> ../devi ces/pseudo/ffmod@0:ctl # # ls -al devices/pseudo/ffmod@0:ctl crw------- 1 root sys...

Solaris and/or ZFS are badly confused about drive IDs. The "c5t0d0" names are very far removed from the real world, and possibly they''ve gotten screwed up somehow. Is devfsadm supposed to fix those, or does it only delete excess? Reason I believe it''s confused: zpool status shows mirror-0 on c9t3d0, c9t2d0, and c9t5d0. But format shows the one remaining Seagate 400GB drive at c5t0d0 (my initial pool was two of those; I replaced one with a Samsung 1TB earli...

...SXCE dvd (snv_99). When I boot without xvm, I can run "mt config" and see the configuration information for the first drive in the library. Under xvm, some scsi operations still work - I can access the changer, move tapes, etc. Howerver, I am unable to see the tape drives. When I run devfsadm -v -i st, I get devfsadm: driver failed to attach: st exit status = 1 modinfo | grep '' st '' show 210 fffffffff86b6000 206e8 129 1 st (SCSI tape Driver) so the module is loaded. Are there any known issues with using tape drives under xvm (from the dom0)? -- This message post...

Hello, Has anyone encountered the following error message, running Solaris 10 u8 in an LDom. bash-3.00# devfsadm devfsadm: write failed for /dev/.devfsadm_dev.lock: Bad exchange descriptor bash-3.00# zpool status -v rpool pool: rpool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possibl...

...as a known UPS. Actually, I've tracked this down to the USB device nodes changing ownership from nobody:nobody to root:root during blazer_ups driver startup :\ I am so far at a loss as to "The why". Even weirder, sometimes the device links get gone as well, and this recovers them: # devfsadm -Cv devfsadm[5083]: verbose: symlink /dev/usb/6da.3/0/devstat -> ../../../../devices/pci at 0,0/pci103c,1609 at 12/input at 5:6da.3.devstat devfsadm[5083]: verbose: symlink /dev/usb/6da.3/0/cntrl0 -> ../../../../devices/pci at 0,0/pci103c,1609 at 12/input at 5:6da.3.cntrl0 devfsadm[5083]: v...

...2006/155 Trusted Extensions RBAC Changes PSARC/2006/191 is_system_labeled 6293271 Zone processes should use zone_kcred instead of kcred 6394554 integrate Solaris Trusted Extensions Files: create: deleted_files/usr/src/cmd/dminfo/Makefile create: usr/src/cmd/allocate/dminfo.c create: usr/src/cmd/devfsadm/devalloc.c create: usr/src/cmd/ldap/ns_ldap/ldapaddtsol.c create: usr/src/cmd/lp/lib/lp/tx.c create: usr/src/cmd/mdb/common/modules/genunix/tsol.c create: usr/src/cmd/mdb/common/modules/genunix/tsol.h create: usr/src/common/tsol/blabel.c create: usr/src/lib/libbsm/common/devalloc.c create: u...

Is there a card for OpenSolaris 2009.06 SPARC that will do SATA correctly yet? Need it for a super cheapie, low expectations, SunBlade 100 filer, so I think it has to be notched for 5v PCI slot, iirc. I''m OK with slow -- main goals here are power saving (sleep all 4 disks) and 1TB+ space. Oh, and I hate to be an old head, but I don''t want a peecee. They still scare me :)

Author: cth Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 500ef11aa236a31cac035eae71de8fe663a498be Log message: 6304001 devfsadmd removes the wrong device links from Files: update: usr/src/cmd/devfsadm/devfsadm.c

...uld now in milestone none verify that the pool was intact: and so it was... fortunately I had not broken the pool itself... all online with no errors to report. I then went to milestone-all which again made the system hang with the disk activity every second forever. I think the task doing this was devfsadm. I then "assumed on a gut feeling" that somehow the system was scanning or checking the pool. I left the system overnight in a desperate attempt because I calculated the 500GB checking to take about 8 hrs if the system would *really* scan everything. (I copied a 1 TB drive last week which...

..../platform/i86xpv/kernel/drv/amd64/xenbus ./platform/i86xpv/kernel/drv/amd64/xencons ./platform/i86xpv/kernel/drv/xencons.conf ./platform/i86xpv/kernel/drv/xenbus ./platform/i86xpv/kernel/drv/xencons ./usr/platform/i86xpv/include/sys/xen_errno.h ./usr/platform/i86xpv/include/sys/xen_mmu.h ./usr/lib/devfsadm/linkmod/SUNW_xen_link.so My question is: why wasn''t xen.gz built as part of the nightly build? What do I need to do to build and run my own copy of Xen? This message posted from opensolaris.org

...rticular application needs more. I hoped ZFS autoexpand would do the trick transparently, but it turned out some manual labor is needed. Even though this was a single-disk pool with a dedicated disk, the EFI label and ultimate Solaris partition and slices did not detect the size change over several devfsadm''s, cfgadm''s, exports, imports, reboots, formats and fdisks - only when I entered some values by hand did things work out. Many solutions just added a bigger disk, mirrored the pool and removed the smaller disk, and were left with a bigger pool. Sometimes for whatever architectura...

I have a desktop system with 2 ZFS mirrors. One drive in one mirror is starting to produce read errors and slowing things down dramatically. I detached it and the system is running fine. I can''t tell which drive it is though! The error message and format command let me know which pair the bad drive is in, but I don''t know how to get any more info than that like the serial number

...y, I've tracked this down to the USB device nodes changing > ownership from nobody:nobody to root:root during blazer_ups driver > startup :\ I am so far at a loss as to "The why". Even weirder, > sometimes the device links get gone as well, and this recovers them: > > # devfsadm -Cv > devfsadm[5083]: verbose: symlink /dev/usb/6da.3/0/devstat -> > ../../../../devices/pci at 0,0/pci103c,1609 at 12/input at 5:6da.3.devstat > devfsadm[5083]: verbose: symlink /dev/usb/6da.3/0/cntrl0 -> > ../../../../devices/pci at 0,0/pci103c,1609 at 12/input at 5:6da.3.cntrl0...

Hi, I have lost a ZFS volume and I am hoping to get some help to recover the information ( a couple of months worth of work :( ). I have been using ZFS for more than 6 months on this project. Yesterday I ran a "zvol status" command, the system froze and rebooted. When it came back the discs where not available. See bellow the output of " zpool status", "format"

...ted it. All went fine and the system was humming along. The fiber-switch rebooted three weeks ago and some of the devices (LUN''s) went into state failing as seen by veritas so I had to online the devices and fsck the volumes that went offline. The tape-drive also took a hit and so I did a devfsadm to have the devices (re)created. But then a device changed name from c3t1d0s2 to c3t0d0s2 and now veritas report the disk as missing and one volume as unavailable. regards Claus

...sts and we get tons of the following messages on /var/adm/messages: Sep 3 15:20:10 fb2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/disk at g20000004cfd81b9f (sd52): Sep 3 15:20:10 fb2 SCSI transport failed: reason ''timeout'': giving up "cfgadm -al" or "devfsadm -C" didn''t solve the problem. After a reboot ZFS recognized the drive as failed and all worked well. Do we need to restart Solaris after a drive failure?? Gino This message posted from opensolaris.org

I have a x4540 with a single pool made from a bunch of raidz1''s with 2 spares (solaris 10 u7). Been running great for over a year, but I''ve had my first event. A day ago the system activated one of the spares c4t7d0, but given the status below, I''m not sure what to do next. # zpool status pool: pool1 state: ONLINE scrub: resilver completed after 2h25m

Hi all, I moved from Sol 10 Update4 to update 6. Before doing this I exported both of my zpools, and replace the discs containing the ufs root on with two new discs (these discs did not have any zpool /zfs info and are raid mirrored in hardware) Once I had installed update6 I did a zpool import, but it only shows (and was able to) import one of the two pools. Looking at dmesg it appears as