Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "devforums".
2012 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] Apple Xcode, LLVM, and automatic (or permanent) breakpoints
...rned up no results (please correct me
> here).
>
> How can one set a permanent breakpoint on malloc_error_break under LLVM?
Take a look at http://lldb.llvm.org/ for LLDB documentation. If you
have further questions, this isn't really the best place to ask; the
Xcode section of http://devforums.apple.com/ is generally best for
Xcode questions; you can also try the lldb-dev mailing list for
questions about lldb.
-Eli
2012 Nov 15
3
[LLVMdev] Apple Xcode, LLVM, and automatic (or permanent) breakpoints
Hi All,
Please forgive me if this is the wrong group. I did not see a
llvm-user group (). The User Guide also lacked a topic
(http://llvm.org/docs/userguides.html#userguides).
I am an Xcode user. I want to set a breakpoint on malloc_error_break
all the time (it makes no sense to re-run after setting the breakpoint
on occasion). I want the breakpoint whenever the debugger starts, and
for all
2013 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] Apple clang 4.2 based on llvm 3.2 produces a wrong "instruction requires:arm-mode"
Moshe,
You're more than likely going to get a better response from
https://devforums.apple.com/community/tools/xcode
llvmdev is a mailing list for the LLVM project which is separate from Xcode development.
Cheers,
Joe
On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Moshe Kravchik <mkravchik at hotmail.com<mailto:mkravchik at hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I've got an assembly file whi...
2013 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember
...on failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember, file /SourceCache/ld64/ld64-136/src/ld/parsers/archive_file.cpp, line 354.
This looks like a bug in the Apple linker, which isn't part of LLVM.
The best on-topic place to ask would probably be Apple's developer
forum (https://devforums.apple.com), but linkers are rather
specialised beasts.
The fact that it's been fixed in XCode 5 probably means filing a bug
won't be that useful for you. Having said that, the ld64 sources are
available online, so if you really need an XCode 4 solution you could
try to track it down yourse...
2013 Jun 12
4
[LLVMdev] Apple clang 4.2 based on llvm 3.2 produces a wrong "instruction requires:arm-mode"
Hi,
I've got an assembly file which used to compile with previous clang versions. However with 4.2 I get the following error:
admin$
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang
-arch armv7 ./src/asm.s -o asm.o
./src/asm.s:30:5: error: instruction requires
a CPU feature not currently enabled
add r2, pc, r2
According to ARM
2013 Oct 22
4
[LLVMdev] ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember
Hi,
I'm encountering the following assertion when linking an Xcode project with Xcode 4.6.3 (4H1503). The project has dependencies on, and links against, an Objective-C static library Xcode project, and a C++ static library Xcode project. All are using using LLVM 4.2.
ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember, file
2011 Dec 22
1
[LLVMdev] Link error using LLVM 2.0 based on XCode 4.0.1
Hey All;
Meet the following link error using LLVM 2.0 based on XCode 4.0.1, I don't know what does it mean and how to fix it? please help, thanks.
ld: bad codegen, pointer diff in ___cxx_global_var_init79 to global weak symbol __ZN5boost16exception_detail23exception_ptr_bad_allocILi42EE1eE for architecture armv7
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
2010 Aug 10
1
[LLVMdev] PTX backend, BSD license
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:21:43 -0500
"Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
> > [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of David A. Greene
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:05 PM
> > To: Helge Rhodin
> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >
2010 Aug 10
0
[LLVMdev] PTX backend, BSD license
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of David A. Greene
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:05 PM
> To: Helge Rhodin
> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] PTX backend, BSD license
>
> Helge Rhodin <helge.rhodin at alice-dsl.net> writes:
>
> >> But I
2015 Jan 22
5
[LLVMdev] Why does "uwtable" prevent optimizing Invoke -> Call?
Hi,
in r176827 the optimization that turns invokes with empty landing pads
into plain calls was disabled for invocations of function with the
"uwtable" attribute.
But given this code:
struct S { ~S() {}; };
void blackbox();
__attribute__((__noinline__)) void inner() { blackbox(); }
int foo() {
S s;
inner();
return 0;
}
int bar() {
2008 Jun 13
2
compiling 2.7.0 GNU/Linux | BLAS & Lapack query
Greetings -
For a host of reasons I chose (was forced) to upgrade my multi-Opteron box
from Fedora 7 -> Fedora 8. In the process, I also updated the ACML I had
installed from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0.
While I get no errors (that I can find) in the config -> make -> make
install sequence, I'm pretty sure (based on some benchmarks) that I'm not
getting BLAS and/or Lapack to compile in. So,
2010 Aug 10
4
[LLVMdev] PTX backend, BSD license
Helge Rhodin <helge.rhodin at alice-dsl.net> writes:
>> But I didn't study their code thoroughly, so I might be wrong about this.
>>
> Yes, we don't use the target-independent code generator and the
> backend is based on the CBackend. We decided to not use the code
> generator because PTX code is also an intermediate language. The
> graphics driver