search for: devforums

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "devforums".

2012 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] Apple Xcode, LLVM, and automatic (or permanent) breakpoints
...rned up no results (please correct me > here). > > How can one set a permanent breakpoint on malloc_error_break under LLVM? Take a look at http://lldb.llvm.org/ for LLDB documentation. If you have further questions, this isn't really the best place to ask; the Xcode section of http://devforums.apple.com/ is generally best for Xcode questions; you can also try the lldb-dev mailing list for questions about lldb. -Eli
2012 Nov 15
3
[LLVMdev] Apple Xcode, LLVM, and automatic (or permanent) breakpoints
Hi All, Please forgive me if this is the wrong group. I did not see a llvm-user group (). The User Guide also lacked a topic (http://llvm.org/docs/userguides.html#userguides). I am an Xcode user. I want to set a breakpoint on malloc_error_break all the time (it makes no sense to re-run after setting the breakpoint on occasion). I want the breakpoint whenever the debugger starts, and for all
2013 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] Apple clang 4.2 based on llvm 3.2 produces a wrong "instruction requires:arm-mode"
Moshe, You're more than likely going to get a better response from https://devforums.apple.com/community/tools/xcode llvmdev is a mailing list for the LLVM project which is separate from Xcode development. Cheers, Joe On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Moshe Kravchik <mkravchik at hotmail.com<mailto:mkravchik at hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I've got an assembly file whi...
2013 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember
...on failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember, file /SourceCache/ld64/ld64-136/src/ld/parsers/archive_file.cpp, line 354. This looks like a bug in the Apple linker, which isn't part of LLVM. The best on-topic place to ask would probably be Apple's developer forum (https://devforums.apple.com), but linkers are rather specialised beasts. The fact that it's been fixed in XCode 5 probably means filing a bug won't be that useful for you. Having said that, the ld64 sources are available online, so if you really need an XCode 4 solution you could try to track it down yourse...
2013 Jun 12
4
[LLVMdev] Apple clang 4.2 based on llvm 3.2 produces a wrong "instruction requires:arm-mode"
Hi, I've got an assembly file which used to compile with previous clang versions. However with 4.2 I get the following error: admin$ /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang -arch armv7 ./src/asm.s -o asm.o ./src/asm.s:30:5: error: instruction requires a CPU feature not currently enabled add r2, pc, r2 According to ARM
2013 Oct 22
4
[LLVMdev] ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember
Hi, I'm encountering the following assertion when linking an Xcode project with Xcode 4.6.3 (4H1503). The project has dependencies on, and links against, an Objective-C static library Xcode project, and a C++ static library Xcode project. All are using using LLVM 4.2. ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember, file
2011 Dec 22
1
[LLVMdev] Link error using LLVM 2.0 based on XCode 4.0.1
Hey All; Meet the following link error using LLVM 2.0 based on XCode 4.0.1, I don't know what does it mean and how to fix it? please help, thanks. ld: bad codegen, pointer diff in ___cxx_global_var_init79 to global weak symbol __ZN5boost16exception_detail23exception_ptr_bad_allocILi42EE1eE for architecture armv7 clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
2010 Aug 10
1
[LLVMdev] PTX backend, BSD license
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:21:43 -0500 "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu > > [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of David A. Greene > > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:05 PM > > To: Helge Rhodin > > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >
2010 Aug 10
0
[LLVMdev] PTX backend, BSD license
> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of David A. Greene > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:05 PM > To: Helge Rhodin > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] PTX backend, BSD license > > Helge Rhodin <helge.rhodin at alice-dsl.net> writes: > > >> But I
2015 Jan 22
5
[LLVMdev] Why does "uwtable" prevent optimizing Invoke -> Call?
Hi, in r176827 the optimization that turns invokes with empty landing pads into plain calls was disabled for invocations of function with the "uwtable" attribute. But given this code: struct S { ~S() {}; }; void blackbox(); __attribute__((__noinline__)) void inner() { blackbox(); } int foo() { S s; inner(); return 0; } int bar() {
2008 Jun 13
2
compiling 2.7.0 GNU/Linux | BLAS & Lapack query
Greetings - For a host of reasons I chose (was forced) to upgrade my multi-Opteron box from Fedora 7 -> Fedora 8. In the process, I also updated the ACML I had installed from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0. While I get no errors (that I can find) in the config -> make -> make install sequence, I'm pretty sure (based on some benchmarks) that I'm not getting BLAS and/or Lapack to compile in. So,
2010 Aug 10
4
[LLVMdev] PTX backend, BSD license
Helge Rhodin <helge.rhodin at alice-dsl.net> writes: >> But I didn't study their code thoroughly, so I might be wrong about this. >> > Yes, we don't use the target-independent code generator and the > backend is based on the CBackend. We decided to not use the code > generator because PTX code is also an intermediate language. The > graphics driver