search for: deveoping

2011/10/28 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > > On Oct 27, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Michael Price wrote: > > Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I > could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for > interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of > commits would help this in the future. >

Hello List, We are deveoping apication/system based on PHP5, Postgre,Ajax,ect.. It should be compleate sistem for realystate agensy and road worers(agents) and it will be distributed system. We made very good inplementation based on asterisk and OSP for distributed offices and it will be part of system (integrated). We would...

dear professor: I have a problem about the nomogram.I have got the result through analysing the dataset "exp2.sav" through multinominal logistic regression by SPSS 17.0. and I want to deveop the nomogram through R-Projject,just like this : > n<-100 > set.seed(10) > T.Grade<-factor(0:3,labels=c("G0", "G1", "G2","G3")) >

On Oct 27, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Michael Price wrote: > Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of commits would help this in the future. > > A very simple script could at least do unique word counts and throw out words

I am looking for a good CMS based on Rails that has at least these attributes: 1. Ease of use ( as it will be used by people who are not html literate) 2. Very easy/flexible to change layout. So far I have looked at http://rcms.oopen.de/Home/ (have not installed it yet) http://adminpages.flowdev.de http://demo.radiantcms.org/admin/pages http://www.eribium.org/eribium/ MuraveyWeb does not seem

I am strongly in favor of increasing the minimum CMake version. I think we should NOT be waiting for the next LLVM release to do so, but should do so as soon as practical (e.g. maybe a month from now). A warning message emitted in CMake spam is not likely to help users very much, IMO. An entry in the release notes saying "This version of LLVM now requires CMake X.Y.Z." along with a link

Hi list! I'm trying to configure the Kirk IP 600 wireless (DECT) system. The wireless phones are regular DECT phones, the Kirk IP 600 is doing the voip part by registering/gatewaying the phones to a callmanager server. The phones do not work and I think the problem is that they do not register at asterisk but I'm not sure because I don't understand a thing of the sccp/skinny

Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of commits would help this in the future. A very simple script could at least do unique word counts and throw out words that match a dictionary (like parts of speech, contributer names,

I agree that’s valuable, but then it’s also important to pin down exactly what a “modern OS” is, and which ones we should keep in mind when we’re considering e.g. which CMake versions are feasible. (The same applies even more so to toolchain requirements, of course.) From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

Greetings, I need some help... please be gentle :-) MY SETUP: Solaris-X86, ruby-1.8.4, Apache-2.2.0, Mongrel-0.3.13.4, MySql-4.1.10a I am using the typical setup with apache proxying request to mongrel with mod_proxy_balancer. Currently, I am only running a single instance of mongrel behind the proxy. I am also using the following gems with this app: capistrano (1.2.0) daemons (1.0.2)

I would be opposed to this proposal.  I've worked with build systems that went this route before.  What happens is the script grows ever more complicated, the person who wrote the script eventually leaves, and no one knows how to build it outside of a particular frozen set of environments.  I've literally seen code bases die (i.e. no one wants to work on them, eventual rewrite target)

Just to clarify, I’m not actually suggesting that we document any minimum sort of environment (other than specific compiler and cmake versions as we currently do). Such a specification would probably be overly restrictive to us in having to maintain it, and to users who might otherwise be able to build LLVM. I’m only suggesting that we consider what’s in popular distros/environments when deciding

Hello, I am just asking this because I am note sure if the problem is on my side or not, I saw some comments on SIP realtime today so I was wondering, has anybody has SIP realtime working with a softfone ? If yes, please confirm, that would give me a light. My previous message to the list is below. Thanks. Frederic ----- Original Message ----- From: Frederic Jean To:

Yeah, I don’t anticipate Windows posing problems. Also, it’s pretty common in Windows to just install software yourself, and CMake ships prebuilt binaries and an installer, so it’s pretty easy to get set up with it. Chris, I’m gonna reiterate a question of mine from an earlier email, since you may have thoughts on it: * If we want to limit ourselves to CMake versions supported by LTS releases of

I hope no one gets offended by my asking, but I wonder what others think about the possibility of splitting the list into two or three focal areas. Personally, I think I''d like to see three seperate lists: 1) newbie development (e.g., help working through tutorials, etc.) 2) more advanced development topics, 3) environment setup / admin.. What do you think? Best regards, Bill

I think we all know that the readability of steps isn''t great right now, and in fact there''s a very recent thread that discusses just that. It was that recent thread that prompted me to explore this a bit. The basic idea is that you define step matchers, which have a regex, and then you match step names against that regex. Kind of tough for me to explain so I''ll just