search for: deveop

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "deveop".

Did you mean: develop
2011 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] Release Notes: Volunteers needed
...this can be automated. The script > would either miss a bunch of really important things or get a ton of not > very useful stuff. I'm open to suggestions of course and proof to the > contrary though! :-) > > -Chris > There is a way, but this method needs interaction of the deveoper. In mesa project, they add a line "Note: This is a candidate for 7.10 branch" to the commit message to automatically merge security fixes into older releases. In LLVM, it could be something like "ReleaseNote: New type system that adds more foo and removes some bar". For the cu...
2006 Nov 28
1
Different click2call?
Hello List, We are deveoping apication/system based on PHP5, Postgre,Ajax,ect.. It should be compleate sistem for realystate agensy and road worers(agents) and it will be distributed system. We made very good inplementation based on asterisk and OSP for distributed offices and it will be part of system (integrated). We wou...
2010 Oct 04
1
I have aproblem about nomogram--thank you for your help
dear professor: I have a problem about the nomogram.I have got the result through analysing the dataset "exp2.sav" through multinominal logistic regression by SPSS 17.0. and I want to deveop the nomogram through R-Projject,just like this : > n<-100 > set.seed(10) > T.Grade<-factor(0:3,labels=c("G0", "G1", "G2","G3")) > Sex<-factor(0:1,labels=c("F","M")) > Smoking<-factor(0:1,labels=c("No&quot...
2011 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] Release Notes: Volunteers needed
On Oct 27, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Michael Price wrote: > Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of commits would help this in the future. > > A very simple script could at least do unique word counts and throw out words
2006 Jun 01
5
Content Management System
I am looking for a good CMS based on Rails that has at least these attributes: 1. Ease of use ( as it will be used by people who are not html literate) 2. Very easy/flexible to change layout. So far I have looked at http://rcms.oopen.de/Home/ (have not installed it yet) http://adminpages.flowdev.de http://demo.radiantcms.org/admin/pages http://www.eribium.org/eribium/ MuraveyWeb does not seem
2020 Apr 08
5
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
...d a new version is small, it's not zero. We should _consider_ the versions that developers are likely to have pre-installed on their machines, and drop support for those versions only when the new features are judged compelling enough to offset the cost (small-pain-per-developer times number-of-deveopers-affected). I agree with others who say we should only upgrade when would be truly valuable -- not automatically just because a new version exists. We should avoid changing the minimum-requirement too often. FInally, I think we should put the decision of when such an upgrade is judged valuable...
2004 Nov 17
3
chan-sccp problem, phone is not registering
Hi list! I'm trying to configure the Kirk IP 600 wireless (DECT) system. The wireless phones are regular DECT phones, the Kirk IP 600 is doing the voip part by registering/gatewaying the phones to a callmanager server. The phones do not work and I think the problem is that they do not register at asterisk but I'm not sure because I don't understand a thing of the sccp/skinny
2011 Oct 28
3
[LLVMdev] Release Notes: Volunteers needed
Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of commits would help this in the future. A very simple script could at least do unique word counts and throw out words that match a dictionary (like parts of speech, contributer names,
2020 Apr 09
3
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
...d a new version is small, it's not zero. We should _consider_ the versions that developers are likely to have pre-installed on their machines, and drop support for those versions only when the new features are judged compelling enough to offset the cost (small-pain-per-developer times number-of-deveopers-affected). I agree with others who say we should only upgrade when would be truly valuable -- not automatically just because a new version exists. We should avoid changing the minimum-requirement too often. FInally, I think we should put the decision of when such an upgrade is judged valuable...
2006 Nov 16
3
Monrel Woes on Solaris x86
...ine and did a (curl localhost:50042), mongrel does not respond. I can see that mongrel is still running if I to a (ps -A). Running (top) shows that mongrel is consuming around 34M of memory and using no .01% CPU. I''m running mongrel in development mode, yet no entries are making it to (deveopment.log). I''m also running mongrel in debug_mode and no entries are being added to any of the log files in the mongrel_debug directory. BTW, I am running mongrel on port 50042 because this is the port I''ve been given permission to run Mongrel on. 2) After hitting mongrel with...
2020 Apr 09
3
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
...We should > _consider_ the versions that developers are likely to have > pre-installed on their machines, and drop support for those > versions only when the new features are judged compelling enough > to offset the cost (small-pain-per-developer times > number-of-deveopers-affected). > > I agree with others who say we should only upgrade when would be > truly valuable -- not automatically just because a new version > exists. We should avoid changing the minimum-requirement too often. > > FInally, I think we should put the decision...
2020 Apr 09
2
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
...d a new version is small, it's not zero. We should _consider_ the versions that developers are likely to have pre-installed on their machines, and drop support for those versions only when the new features are judged compelling enough to offset the cost (small-pain-per-developer times number-of-deveopers-affected). I agree with others who say we should only upgrade when would be truly valuable -- not automatically just because a new version exists. We should avoid changing the minimum-requirement too often. FInally, I think we should put the decision of when such an upgrade is judged valuable...
2006 Mar 21
12
Fw: anybody has SIP realtime working ?
Hello, I am just asking this because I am note sure if the problem is on my side or not, I saw some comments on SIP realtime today so I was wondering, has anybody has SIP realtime working with a softfone ? If yes, please confirm, that would give me a light. My previous message to the list is below. Thanks. Frederic ----- Original Message ----- From: Frederic Jean To:
2020 Apr 08
3
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
Yeah, I don’t anticipate Windows posing problems. Also, it’s pretty common in Windows to just install software yourself, and CMake ships prebuilt binaries and an installer, so it’s pretty easy to get set up with it. Chris, I’m gonna reiterate a question of mine from an earlier email, since you may have thoughts on it: * If we want to limit ourselves to CMake versions supported by LTS releases of
2006 Jul 14
39
Time to split the list?
I hope no one gets offended by my asking, but I wonder what others think about the possibility of splitting the list into two or three focal areas. Personally, I think I''d like to see three seperate lists: 1) newbie development (e.g., help working through tutorials, etc.) 2) more advanced development topics, 3) environment setup / admin.. What do you think? Best regards, Bill
2007 Oct 14
40
Step matchers
I think we all know that the readability of steps isn''t great right now, and in fact there''s a very recent thread that discusses just that. It was that recent thread that prompted me to explore this a bit. The basic idea is that you define step matchers, which have a regex, and then you match step names against that regex. Kind of tough for me to explain so I''ll just