search for: devend

...ode RAC cluster Running on RHEL 5.0 .. i just want to what is oracle recomendid Defaults values for below mention parameters Thanks for your help Heartbeat dead threshold network idle timeout network keepalive delay in ms network reconnect delay in ms kernel.panic_on_oops kernel.panic Regards, Devender

Hi Guys ? i need ocfs2 software for 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 RHEL 64 bit.. Can anybody please tell me from where i can download it. ? thanks ? Devender -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20100326/a549df25/attachment.html

HI team i am not able to find ocfs kernel for 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 .. can you please help me from where i can download this . its bit urgent for me . i need it for 64 bit linux . Thanks Devender -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20110602/73b1ae0d/attachment.html

Hi team I had installed OCFS2 on RHEL5.0 . every thing looks fine but when I was installing CRS on the node I got error message OCFS2 is not supported. Can you please put some light on this. Please find other info below [root at eregtest1 client]# uname -a Linux eregtest1.admin.abdn.ac.uk 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:15 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux i am using RHEL 5.0

...host_work_flush() instead of synchronize_rcu() may work. > - Having some hard thought, I think we can use seqlock, it looks > to me smp_wmb() is in write_segcount_begin() is sufficient, we don't > care vq->map read before smp_wmb(), and for the other we all have > good data devendency so smp_wmb() in the write_seqbegin_end() is > sufficient. If we need an mb in the begin() we can switch to dependent_ptr_mb. if you need me to fix it up and repost, let me know. Why isn't it a problem if the map is accessed outside the lock? > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c...

...If not, a simple vhost_work_flush() instead of synchronize_rcu() may work. - Having some hard thought, I think we can use seqlock, it looks to me smp_wmb() is in write_segcount_begin() is sufficient, we don't care vq->map read before smp_wmb(), and for the other we all have good data devendency so smp_wmb() in the write_seqbegin_end() is sufficient. diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index db2c81cb1e90..6d9501303258 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -363,39 +363,29 @@ static bool vhost_map_range_overlap(struct vhost_uaddr *uad...

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:46:53AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to use RCU to synchronize MMU notifier with worker. This leads > calling synchronize_rcu() in invalidate_range_start(). But on a busy > system, there would be many factors that may slow down the > synchronize_rcu() which makes it unsuitable to be called in MMU > notifier. > > A solution is SRCU but its

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:46:53AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to use RCU to synchronize MMU notifier with worker. This leads > calling synchronize_rcu() in invalidate_range_start(). But on a busy > system, there would be many factors that may slow down the > synchronize_rcu() which makes it unsuitable to be called in MMU > notifier. > > A solution is SRCU but its