search for: developements

I'm trying to compile the latest wine release from source after a fresh linux mint install, and this is what I get when I do './configure' Code: configure: libxcursor development files not found, the Xcursor extension won't be supported. configure: libxi development files not found, the Xinput extension won't be supported. configure: XShape development files not found, XShape

Hello all... I'm trying to compile wine 1.3.21 on my Linux Mint Debian Edition machine, because I'm tired of the antique version available from the repositories. Unfortunately, ./configure always ends with a bunch of WARNINGs and I'm not sure what to do about them. Here's the list it gives me: Code: configure: libxcursor development files not found, the Xcursor extension won't

config.status: linking AUTHORS to dlls/shell32/AUTHORS config.status: linking tools/winewrapper to wine config.status: executing include/stamp-h commands config.status: executing dlls/gdi32/enhmfdrv commands config.status: executing dlls/gdi32/mfdrv commands config.status: executing dlls/kernel32/nls commands config.status: executing dlls/user32/resources commands config.status: executing

Dear LLVM community I need some help please. I want to use LLVM's clang and lld within a MacOSX sandboxed app. This is because sandboxing does not allow calls to /usr/bin/clang. The clang binary works fine to compile a file, but ld64.lld comes up with the error "cannot find framework". However similar arguments using /usr/bin/ld instead of ld64.lld works fine. Here are the

Hi, I would like to follow up on the recent discussion on the mailing list about requirements for new backends[1] by submitting the following proposal for a staging area for new LLVM backends. This proposal incorporates ideas from Owen, Chandler, and others who chimed in on the original thread, and I hope the LLVM developers will be able to come to a consensus on this proposal or a modified

This drives me insane on a regular basis. How does one mock system(''blah'') or `blah` ? Adding expectations on Kernel doesn''t do it. Adding expectations on Object just makes me sad: Object.any_instance.expects(:system).with(''ls'') # => #<Mock:0x12b584e>.system(''ls'') - expected calls: 0, actual calls: 1 And this really

Hi Folks, One key goal for Wine 1.0 is that all of its conformance tests run successfully on nearly all systems. We would really like your help in figuring out how close we are to that goal. To that end, if you are comfortable with checking Wine out via git, could you please visit this page: http://wiki.winehq.org/MakeTestFailures and follow the instructions there? (It's really simple;

Just out of curiousity, what OS do most of you use for development? Do you prefer to use WinXP to do your development, and then deploy to a linux server, or do you actually use some distribution of linux (Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, etc) for development? Thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Error: Code: checking for freetype-config... no checking for freetype2-config... no checking for -lfreetype... not found configure: error: FreeType development files not found. Fonts will not be built. Use the --without-freetype option if you really want this. I tried using the option: Code: ./tools/wineinstall --without-freetype Same error.

Hello all, I have replaced the llvm-gcc shipped with the Xcode by the latest version and I was wondering if I have missed something... (everything *seems* to work). Here's what I did: 0. Checkout LLVM (and clang) + llvm-gcc 1. Build LLVM (with clang) and install into /Developer/usr/local : # mkdir llvmobj # cd llvmobj # CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2 ../llvm/configure

Hi, Now that --enable-experimental-targets build flags have been added to the build systems. What needs to be done in order to get the R600 backend added as an experimental target? I've posted an updated version of the backend to llvm-commits[1], that addresses many of the criticisms of the backend, but I haven't received any feedback, and I feel like the submission process has stalled.

Hi, I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions are required to make the staging area a reality? Is more discussion needed? Is anyone willing to volunteer to be the "Code Owner" for the staging area, to help move the

Dear Tom, Looks like setting LCOMMDirectiveType in AMDGPUMCAsmInfo.cpp is not needed anymore? I commented it out, and then LLVM got compiled fine. - D. 2012/9/6 Tom Stellard <tstellar at gmail.com>: > Hi, > > Now that --enable-experimental-targets build flags have been added to > the build systems. What needs to be done in order to get the R600 > backend added as an

Hi, i have compile and built the llvm-gcc4 and llvm 1.8a in my machine, but there is some problem about llvm-gcc4. It can not compile a cpp code like this: #include <iostream> using std::cout; using std::endl; int main() { cout << "Hello" << endl; } $llvm-g++ hello.cc -o hello /developer/zsth/llvm-gcc/install/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../..

Hi folks, I'm looking for a developer to join my team in Austin to help develop linker back ends for ARM and AArch64. Given that this is the LLVM dev list, I want to be clear that the work involves close collaboration with our internal LLVM teams so LLVM experience is a definite plus, but it does not involve direct development on LLVM. I'm ideally looking for someone with direct

Good afternoon, I''ve two quick questions for the Ruby/Rails community. 1) Do you use Linux for Ruby or Rails development? 2) If you use Linux, which distro do you normally use to develop? Thank you for your input. :-) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

The raspberry Pi2 is an armv7a chip (Cortex-A7), the first stage builds fine with the native g++ (if not a little slowly at 10+ hours), but it crashes at some point with this command line: Program arguments: /home/ben/development/llvm/3.6.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.install/bin/clang -cc1 -triple armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf -emit-obj -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier

Hello guys, I''m developing a new app in Rails, and every now and then I get an ActiveRecord error, I cannot reproduce exactly what triggers it, hope you can help me, or give me tips on debugging this kind of stuff. This time I got the error reporting page, but normally I would just see the 500.html page, with no info about what went wrong. This is the error (it''s the complete

Hi all, (Sorry if the answer to this is obvious - and thanks in advance~) Short version: linker error of _backtrace from LLVMSystem.a building a dynamic library embedding LLVM/clang, both against the OSX 10.4 sdk. Long version: I've just tried rebuilding my project using the 2.6 release, using the following commands to try and force LLVM to build against the OSX 10.4 sdk (I am

On 07/27/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There > seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also > new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions > are required to make the staging area a reality? Is more discussion > needed? Is anyone willing to