Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "devekopment".
Did you mean:
_development
2018 Jul 25
1
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
...;
> ??? > library(spam, lib.loc = "~/lib")
> ??? Error: package ?dotCall64? required by ?spam? could not be found
Not sure if this is a bug: where is it documented that this works not as
above (which is what I would expect)?
For development puposes, you may want to try some devekopment version of
one package agaiunst release versions of the others.
This is the purpose of the above: take spam from ~lib and the other from
.libPath().
Best,
Uwe Ligges
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> ???? > On 07/21/2018 12:34 PM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> ???? >>>&g...
2018 Jul 24
4
Library lib.loc Option Ignored for Dependencies
>>>>> Benjamin Tyner
>>>>> on Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:42:43 -0400 writes:
> Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here:
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html
> but in any case perhaps the problem could partially be remedied on line
> 245 of src/library/base/R/library.R by passing the lib.loc to