search for: devconfer

TL;DR: CentOS Dojo on August 14th at Boston University. CFP and Registration now available at https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/DevConfUS2019 Hello, folks. We will once again be holding the CentOS Dojo at Boston University, on the day before DevConf.US 2019. The details of DevConf.US are at https://devconf.us/ and the details of the CentOS Dojo are at

Hi, On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com> wrote: > Welcome to an exceptionally busy month for Gluster! > > Gluster Summit > Thanks to all who attended this year's Gluster Summit. As you can see, > conversations are continuing to happen, with notes from the Birds of a > Feather sessions starting to come into the mailing lists. If something

Hi All, I'm attending both DevConf (25-28) and Fosdem (3-4). If any of you are attending the conferences and would like to talk about gluster, please feel free to ping me through irc nick rafi on freenode or message me on +436649795838 Regards Rafi KC

Welcome to an exceptionally busy month for Gluster! Gluster Summit Thanks to all who attended this year's Gluster Summit. As you can see, conversations are continuing to happen, with notes from the Birds of a Feather sessions starting to come into the mailing lists. If something sparked your interest, please post about it! We'll be posting recordings of the talks as we're able to, and

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 06:24:36PM +0530, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm attending both DevConf (25-28) and Fosdem (3-4). If any of you are > attending the conferences and would like to talk about gluster, please > feel free to ping me through irc nick rafi on freenode or message me on > +436649795838 In addition to that at FOSDEM, there is a Gluster stand

DevConf.us will be held in Boston, August 17th - 19th. CentOS will have a booth/table in the expo area, and we need your help staffing that table. If you are able to volunteer for an hour (or more) to staff the table, please sign up here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KDVgTO4M4UFdtONRHAjKTFRnwUMk4P2tTkZvgaWT188/edit#gid=0 Volunteers will receive their choice of a CentOS polo shirt,

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a commit to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new c10f929 ornl video c10f929 is described below commit c10f92988b176fab93f5f37f0f37f39c654c180f Author: rbowen <rbowen at rcbowen.com> AuthorDate: Mon May 20 09:09:43

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. shaunm pushed a commit to branch main in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 22e55e6 Add post about Connect 2024, remove old posts 22e55e6 is described below commit 22e55e6b8d076aac3150d67243db046469503bbd Author: Shaun McCance <shaunm at redhat.com>

On 08/19/2015 07:54 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: >>> Clarify general description of the mac, status and >>> max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is >>> vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a commit to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new f75007f Update front page. new 568ab86 Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git.centos.org/centos/centos.org f75007f is described below commit

On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > Clarify general description of the mac, status and > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of > the fields are non valid. > > Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two > different feature flags. > > Signed-off-by:

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > > Clarify general description of the mac, status and > > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is > > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of > > the fields are non valid. > > > > Also

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > > Clarify general description of the mac, status and > > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is > > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of > > the fields are non valid. > > > > Also

Clarify general description of the mac, status and max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of the fields are non valid. Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two different feature flags. Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork at redhat.com> --- content.tex | 42

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a commit to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 81e48e3 release announcements 81e48e3 is described below commit 81e48e36ccb7b66d06bb35057d5ae0ca98353db7 Author: rbowen <rbowen at rcbowen.com> AuthorDate: Tue Sep

Hi folks, I do see some updates coming in for RHEL8.1 and wonder why some are not coming into current C8 (latency already included)? Are there any staging? Koji shows such packages as finished/complete... -- Leon

Gluster Monthly Newsletter, September 2017 Gluster Summit is coming! October 27-28 in Prague, Czech Republic! https://www.gluster.org/events/summit2017/ Registration is open until October 20th, 2017. Noteworthy Threads: [Gluster-devel] Proposed Protocol changes for 4.0: Need feedback. http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-September/053603.html [Gluster-devel] Call for help:

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:18 AM Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 9/18/18 8:27 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > On 18/09/18 14:19, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> Hmm. I matched the existing banner size identically as I assumed it was > >> correct. There are in fact 4 banners now on random rotate. > >> > > I'm not a designer, but what about

On 18/09/18 14:19, Rich Bowen wrote: > Hmm. I matched the existing banner size identically as I assumed it was > correct. There are in fact 4 banners now on random rotate. > I'm not a designer, but what about using something that have some kind of "centos look-n-feel" at the design level ? What about the common banner we use almost everywhere, including wiki ? Just my

On Fri Oct 19 00:52:12 UTC 2018 Japheth Cleaver wrote: > This brings to mind a video I was pointed to not long ago of Brendan > Conoboy's talk at a Dojo recently: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQsUdLPJW20 Hey, that's me! Hi. By the way, Jim Perrin did an updated version of this talk *today* at CERN in my absence (thanks Jim!). Hopefully the video will be posted