Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "dev_op".
Did you mean:
dev_ops
2019 Oct 16
0
[PATCH V3 4/7] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...> The contents of the ops structure is essentially defined by the id, which is
> > why I was leaning towards them being defined together. They are effectively
> > interlocked, the id defines which mdev "endpoint"
> > driver is loaded and that driver requires mdev_get_dev_ops() to return the
> > structure required by the driver. I wish there was a way we could
> > incorporate type checking here. We toyed with the idea of having the class
> > in the same structure as the ops, but I think this approach was chosen for
> > simplicity. We could st...
2019 Oct 16
0
[PATCH V3 4/7] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...ed by the
> > > > > > id, which is why I was leaning towards them being defined together.
> > > > > > They are effectively interlocked, the id defines which mdev "endpoint"
> > > > > > driver is loaded and that driver requires mdev_get_dev_ops() to
> > > > > > return the structure required by the driver. I wish there was a
> > > > > > way we could incorporate type checking here. We toyed with the
> > > > > > idea of having the class in the same structure as the ops, but I
> >...
2019 Oct 15
6
[PATCH V3 4/7] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...to be paired with ids in id_table in mdev_driver
> +structure for probing the correct driver.
"The class id (specified in id) is used to match a device with an mdev
driver via its id table."
?
> The device_ops is device
> +specific callbacks which can be get through mdev_get_dev_ops()
> +function by mdev bus driver.
"The device specific callbacks (specified in *ops) are obtainable via
mdev_get_dev_ops() (for use by the mdev bus driver.)"
?
> For vfio-mdev device, its device specific
> +ops are as follows:
"A vfio-mdev device (class id MDEV_ID_VFIO...
2019 Oct 15
6
[PATCH V3 4/7] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...to be paired with ids in id_table in mdev_driver
> +structure for probing the correct driver.
"The class id (specified in id) is used to match a device with an mdev
driver via its id table."
?
> The device_ops is device
> +specific callbacks which can be get through mdev_get_dev_ops()
> +function by mdev bus driver.
"The device specific callbacks (specified in *ops) are obtainable via
mdev_get_dev_ops() (for use by the mdev bus driver.)"
?
> For vfio-mdev device, its device specific
> +ops are as follows:
"A vfio-mdev device (class id MDEV_ID_VFIO...
2019 Oct 16
0
[PATCH V3 4/7] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...structure is essentially defined by the id,
> > > > which is why I was leaning towards them being defined together.
> > > > They are effectively interlocked, the id defines which mdev "endpoint"
> > > > driver is loaded and that driver requires mdev_get_dev_ops() to
> > > > return the structure required by the driver. I wish there was a way
> > > > we could incorporate type checking here. We toyed with the idea of
> > > > having the class in the same structure as the ops, but I think this
> > > > approach...
2019 Oct 17
2
[PATCH V3 4/7] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...ucture is essentially defined by the id,
>>>>> which is why I was leaning towards them being defined together.
>>>>> They are effectively interlocked, the id defines which mdev "endpoint"
>>>>> driver is loaded and that driver requires mdev_get_dev_ops() to
>>>>> return the structure required by the driver. I wish there was a way
>>>>> we could incorporate type checking here. We toyed with the idea of
>>>>> having the class in the same structure as the ops, but I think this
>>>>> appr...
2019 Oct 17
2
[PATCH V3 4/7] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...ucture is essentially defined by the id,
>>>>> which is why I was leaning towards them being defined together.
>>>>> They are effectively interlocked, the id defines which mdev "endpoint"
>>>>> driver is loaded and that driver requires mdev_get_dev_ops() to
>>>>> return the structure required by the driver. I wish there was a way
>>>>> we could incorporate type checking here. We toyed with the idea of
>>>>> having the class in the same structure as the ops, but I think this
>>>>> appr...
2019 Nov 12
20
[PATCH hmm v3 00/14] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
8 of the mmu_notifier using drivers (i915_gem, radeon_mn, umem_odp, hfi1,
scif_dma, vhost, gntdev, hmm) drivers are using a common pattern where
they only use invalidate_range_start/end and immediately check the
invalidating range against some driver data structure to tell if the
driver is interested. Half of them use an interval_tree, the others
2019 Oct 28
32
[PATCH v2 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
8 of the mmu_notifier using drivers (i915_gem, radeon_mn, umem_odp, hfi1,
scif_dma, vhost, gntdev, hmm) drivers are using a common pattern where
they only use invalidate_range_start/end and immediately check the
invalidating range against some driver data structure to tell if the
driver is interested. Half of them use an interval_tree, the others