search for: detangler

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "detangler".

Did you mean: demangler
2009 May 05
0
OT: Polycom handset cord detangler
Hello list, I wondered if those of you using Polycom phones could recommend a decent cord detangler. I've had quite a few handsets get the tabs broken off in the jack from cord detanglers due to the recessed nature of the jack. This seems like it would work but I wanted some opinions before I go buy some: http://www.voiplink.com/Extended_Handset_Cord_Detangler_p/detangler-e.htm I persona...
2008 Aug 29
0
Detangling the ppbus/ppc interrupt stuff..
So I have a patch to try and straighten out the ppbus/ppc interrupt stuff a bit. Rather than passing IRQ numbers around as ivars, etc., ppc is smart enough to let child devices ask for SYS_RES_IRQ rid 0 and let them use its assigned IRQ resource. It then uses an interrupt event to mange the list of child interrupt handlers which it invokes from its own interrupt handler. I don't
2010 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] tblgen internals
On Dec 12, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Garrison Venn wrote: > > Hey Chris, > > The following patch removes all global references to a RecordKeeper instance for the tblgen > utility. This effort was motivated by the FIXME remark, in TableGen.cpp. Although a few files > were touched, the main change was to Record.h. > > The patch takes the simple approach of adding a RecordKeeper
2010 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] tblgen internals
Hey Chris, The following patch removes all global references to a RecordKeeper instance for the tblgen utility. This effort was motivated by the FIXME remark, in TableGen.cpp. Although a few files were touched, the main change was to Record.h. The patch takes the simple approach of adding a RecordKeeper reference to TGParser, and any needed emitter helper classes. In addition, since some of
2010 Dec 13
4
[LLVMdev] tblgen internals
Hi Chris, Thanks for the review! I believe I caught most of the syntax style issues with the attached patch. It only contains these style changes. On Dec 12, 2010, at 19:30, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Garrison Venn wrote: > >> >> Hey Chris, >> >> The following patch removes all global references to a RecordKeeper instance for the
2015 Apr 06
0
[ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-keyboard 1.8.1
Two bugfixes, two cleanups. The fix for 89653 fixes a dead keyboard on Linux machines, though note that use of this driver under Linux is considered very much a legacy use case. Use evdev or the new libinput driver instead. Egbert's fix untangles overlaps between multimedia keys and the jp Henkan/Muhenkan keys. Alan Coopersmith (1): Mark xf86OSKbdPreInit as _X_EXPORT in header to match
2009 Nov 13
6
[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
On Nov 12, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Talin wrote: > > Well, as far as intp goes (or iptr if you prefer - the naming > convention in LLVM is i<size>) How about "intptr". > here's what I would expect: > General rule #1: If an instruction accepts both i32 and i64, then it > should accept iptr as well. If it only accepts i32, then it can > continue to only
2010 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] tblgen internals
Concerning the RecordKeeper reference in Record. Would you prefer to partially go back to a more limited constrained version of a global. Since we are not threaded anyway, we could turn the reference into a singleton for the duration of an initial parse and use session. The concept would be to instead make the reference a static pointer, make RecordKeeper a friend of Record, and add
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Talin wrote: > > > Well, as far as intp goes (or iptr if you prefer - the naming convention in > LLVM is i<size>) > > > How about "intptr". > > here's what I would expect: > > - General rule #1: If an instruction accepts
2009 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Talin wrote: > > I realize that most users of LLVM aren't affected by this, because most > frontends aren't target-neutral, and thus know in advance how big a pointer > is. At least, that's my impression. > > I believe that. > > >
2009 Nov 11
4
[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Talin wrote: > I realize that most users of LLVM aren't affected by this, because most frontends aren't target-neutral, and thus know in advance how big a pointer is. At least, that's my impression. I believe that. > There's only a tiny handful of fairly esoteric cases which require selecting a target before you generate IR. Unfortunately, the
2016 Jun 24
7
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32
Hi, Having recently enabled IAS by default for the MIPS O32 ABI, I'm now trying to do the same thing for the MIPS N64 ABI. Unfortunately, it is not currently possible to enable IAS by default for the N64 ABI without also enabling it for the N32 ABI because this information is not reflected in the triple and that's the only information MipsMCAsmInfo has. This would be fine if it N32 was
2016 Jul 05
2
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32
Hi Eric, It's the unsolved problems on the pass-MCTargetOptions-everywhere path that are my main concern with that approach rather than the amount of work. The first problem is that the result of IRObjectFile::CollectAsmUndefinedRefs() depends on the ABI but IRObjectFile doesn't know it. How would you deliver the ABI to IRObjectFile? The second problem is that IRLinker will link