Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "destvalue".
Did you mean:
descvalue
2015 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] Eliminating redundant loads
...unds %ravi.LClosure* %3, i64 0, i32 5
%4 = load %ravi.Proto** %Proto, align 8
%k = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.Proto* %4, i64 0, i32 14
%5 = load %ravi.TValue** %k, align 8
%6 = load %ravi.TValue** %base, align 8
%srcvalue = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.TValue* %5, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0
%destvalue = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.TValue* %6, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0
%7 = load double* %srcvalue, align 8
store double %7, double* %destvalue, align 8
%srctype = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.TValue* %5, i64 0, i32 1
%desttype = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.TValue* %6, i64 0, i32 1
%8 = load i32...
2015 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] Eliminating redundant loads
...dule_ravif1'
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-pc-windows-msvc-elf"
%0 = type { %ravi.TValue*, i32*, i64 }
....
%6 = load %ravi.TValue** %base
%srcvalue = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.TValue* %5, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0
%destvalue = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.TValue* %6, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0
%7 = load double* %srcvalue
store double %7, double* %destvalue
%srctype = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.TValue* %5, i32 0, i32 1
%desttype = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.TValue* %6, i32 0, i32 1
%8 = load i32* %srctype
store...
2015 Feb 22
2
[LLVMdev] Eliminating redundant loads
On 22 February 2015 at 20:58, David Jones <djones at xtreme-eda.com> wrote:
> Not sure if this is your problem, but it was mine:
>
> You must create (or obtain) a DataLayout *and install it into the Module*.
>
> It is possible to generate machine code for IR and not install the
> DataLayout into the Module. Rather, the DataLayout is used locally at the
> point where code
2015 Feb 23
3
[LLVMdev] Eliminating redundant loads
On 23 February 2015 at 01:29, Kamal Sharma <kgs1.rice at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dibyendu,
>
> It would be very helpful if you could post the original source code or
> snippet.
> That way, one can investigate deeper to understand the problem.
>
> Regards,
> Kamal Sharma
>
Hi Kamal,
Sure. I guess I ought to create a test that one can look in isolation.
I am