search for: destroy_fil

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "destroy_fil".

Did you mean: destroy_file
2004 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] Little win32/Signals.cpp patch
Actually, <algorithm> is not correct. This remove is in stdio.h and io.h in VC7.1. It removes a file, not elements from a collection. The proper solution is to not use remove at all and use Path::destroy_file(). On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:09:37 -0700 Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > <algorithm> works too. > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:09:21 -0500 > Alkis Evlogimenos <alkis at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 09:43, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:...
2004 Sep 24
1
[LLVMdev] Little win32/Signals.cpp patch
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 08:17:41AM -0700, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Actually, <algorithm> is not correct. This remove is in stdio.h and > io.h in VC7.1. It removes a file, not elements from a collection. > > The proper solution is to not use remove at all and use > Path::destroy_file(). But don't you want to use ::remove instead of std::remove then? -- Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net :: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
2004 Sep 24
1
[LLVMdev] Little win32/Signals.cpp patch
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 08:17, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Actually, <algorithm> is not correct. This remove is in stdio.h and > io.h in VC7.1. It removes a file, not elements from a collection. > > The proper solution is to not use remove at all and use > Path::destroy_file(). Yes. I'm currently working on "Block", "File" and "MappedFile" abstractions for lib/System. When done, these abstractions will take care of the bulks of the remaining system dependent behavior in LLVM. Unfortunately, the conversion from the XPS code is somewh...
2004 Sep 24
6
[LLVMdev] Little win32/Signals.cpp patch
<algorithm> works too. On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:09:21 -0500 Alkis Evlogimenos <alkis at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 09:43, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > > Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > > >But I compiled that under vc7.1 as it was! > > > > > > > > ;-(( > > > > Probably is an implicid includes, but I'm using the
2008 Sep 25
1
Will acts_as_paranoid work with attachment_fu?
I''ve got a problem in that users are deleting a paranoid model through the application, including dependents. Some of these dependents are paranoid too, but not the attachments. (I''m using DB file storage.) I need to be able to un-delete these things and I''m now wondering if acts_as_paranoid will work with models that use attachment_fu? If so, in what model to I add the
2004 Sep 24
1
[LLVMdev] Little win32/Signals.cpp patch
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 05:32:08PM +0200, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > Jeff Cohen wrote: > > ><algorithm> works too. > > > > > For std::remove yes... but... > > d:\home\arathorn\sandbox\llvm\llvm\lib\System\platform\Signals.cpp(179) > : error C2065: 'stderr' : undeclared identifier >