search for: destabilizing

> I think many people were confused by this at first but an excellent counter > example was provided in a previous thread: C99 ABIs can require that struct > return values are returned via a pointer to a preallocated struct passed as > an auxiliary argument *except* when you're talking about a C99 complex, in > which case the return value is conveyed in a completely different

We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. Thanks, stuart

On Wednesday 18 February 2009 20:57:02 DeLesley Hutchins wrote: > > It's done by the front-end. There are a variety of attributes and > > mechanisms which are used to convolute data and marshall it through > > call sites in an ABI-conformant manner. > > Oh dear. :-( I think many people were confused by this at first but an excellent counter example was provided in a

...AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote: > We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) > recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. > > I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization > day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four > hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. OK. I wonder if we might be able to automate the stabilization somewhat. I'm not at all sure this can be done without introducing worse problems that it solves, but here's some discus...

> It's done by the front-end. There are a variety of attributes and > mechanisms which are used to convolute data and marshall it through > call sites in an ABI-conformant manner. Oh dear. :-( Do the attributes change depending on the type? I would assume that attributes like "ccc" are type-invariant; i.e. every instantiation should use the C-calling convention, whatever

I have a package that can use rmpi, but works fine without it. None of the automatic test code invokes rmpi functionality. (One test file illustrates how to use it, but has quit() as its first command.) What's the best way to handle this? In particular, what is the appropriate form for upload to CRAN? When I omitted rmpi from the DESCRITPION file R CMD check gave <quote> * checking

I am considering installing a Puppet agent on a legacy server running an old, crappy, slow, leaky, yet important Java app. Nervous about introducing anything that might (further) destabilize the app. What are people''s experiences with Puppet in terms of resource usage (CPU/ memory/network/etc)? For starters will likely run it on the standard daemon schedule. Ultimately may want to control

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 12:42 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Le jeudi 13 janvier 2005 ? 10:59 -0500, Jared Whitby a ?crit : > > Interestingly enough.. I started playing around with preprocessing > > options in 1.1.6 and happened upon the denoise filter > > (SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE). When i run the test tone using that > > option it is completely filtered out and I

...> compatible and moving to svn could be rolled in under that pretext. I don't see that waiting for a 2.0 release is needed if/when we want to change. Further, I'd be perfectly happy if "2.0" was just "1.9" + ".1"... i.e. I don't see a great need for destabilizing or non-backwards-compatible changes to LLVM. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Why do you say that people who compile, e.g., functional languages would benefit from type variables in LLVM? I like the level the LLVM is at, and would prefer to deal with instantiating parametric polymorphism at a higher level. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:43 PM, DeLesley Hutchins <delesley.spambox at googlemail.com> wrote: >> I think many people were confused by this at first but an

I''ve hit this bug on four of my Solaris 11 servers. Looking for anyone else who has seen it, as well as comments/speculation on cause. This bug is pretty bad. If you are lucky you can import the pool read-only and migrate it elsewhere. I''ve also tried setting zfs:zfs_recover=1,aok=1 with varying results. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E28978/gmkgj.html#scrolltoc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Welcome to the first release of the 3.1.0 development branch. This is an unstable release series intended only for use by testers and developers. We make no claims as to whether it even works. The purpose of the 3.1.x releases is similar to what we've used the 'alpha' tag for in the past. These are unstable, development releases that

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Welcome to the first release of the 3.1.0 development branch. This is an unstable release series intended only for use by testers and developers. We make no claims as to whether it even works. The purpose of the 3.1.x releases is similar to what we've used the 'alpha' tag for in the past. These are unstable, development releases that

If read.table() is defaulting to "character" instead of "factor" data type, shouldn't type.convert() also default to "character" in R 4.0.0? This would seem like a good time to change the default to type.convert(as.is=TRUE), to align it with the new default in read.table and data.frame. I think many R >=4.0.0 users would be happy with as.is=TRUE as the default

Hi there, I'm wondering if there any patch or recent developement that would allow to include a directory rather than a file in smb.conf Something like includedir = /etc/samba/shares.d/ instead of include = /etc/samba/shares.conf Thanks for your help Santiago ------------------------- *Santiago DIEZ* *Director* *+33 6 37 90 81 98* -------------------------

Dear Martin, Thank you for the well-reasoned response. I realized I was rather late to make this suggestion for 4.0.0, changing a somewhat low-level function that can indeed affect packages. I was just reviewing some R user scripts that were using type.convert(), mainly on data frames. In all cases, people were passing as.is=TRUE, so I was reminded that I would not be the only user who would

...ost again and proxy the mail there for each user separately. This could also be optionally done only when the process UID differs from the destionation user's UID. When? ----- These are too invasive changes to v2.0, so I guess they'll wait until v2.1. Luckily there won't be any hugely destabilizing changes going into v2.1, so maybe v2.1.0 release won't be too many months after v2.0.0. :)

Working on fixing lower-priority bugs that I didn't want to risk destabilizing the 2.07 release for: Changes in 2.08: * Add "timeoutcmd" to allow timeout to have a different action than just pressing Enter. * Fix bugs in the COMBOOT/COM32 command-line parsing. APPEND now works with COMBOOT/COM32 images. ftp://ftp.kernel.org...

Hi, I''ve used etckeeper before and it puts the contents of /etc/ into a local git repository. This means that I can easily see any changes which have been made to anything in /etc/ However, I need to look after a SLES server - and etckeeper is not available. Also, I''m looking to upgrade server management to Puppet. Is there anyway Puppet can be used to manage /etc/ - i.e.

I've finally read and answered most of the mails on this list. ?If you haven't received an answer to your question, resend it. There are a couple of tricky mbox issues left, but I'm not sure if I can do anything about them unless someone can show me how to reproduce the problems. There are quite a lot of new features in v1.1.2 actually. Most of them are in plugins so hopefully they