Displaying 20 results from an estimated 62 matches for "destabilize".
2009 Feb 18
3
[LLVMdev] Parametric polymorphism
...ialization IR optimizations be
>> performed?
>
> They could but my impression is that this will only ever be an academic
> exercise: I doubt LLVM's type system will ever be changed in such a
> fundamental way simply because the back-end is reaching maturity and that
> would destabilize a large part of the library but also because there is no
> clear advantage in doing that, not only for the majority of LLVM users but
> also in the context of its goals.
The majority of llvm users are using llvm to compile C, or things that are
similar to C. People who want to compile somet...
2009 Jul 15
3
[LLVMdev] please stabilize the trunk
We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang)
recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly.
I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization
day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four
hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again.
Thanks,
stuart
2009 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] Parametric polymorphism
...hy couldn't post-specialization IR optimizations be
> performed?
They could but my impression is that this will only ever be an academic
exercise: I doubt LLVM's type system will ever be changed in such a
fundamental way simply because the back-end is reaching maturity and that
would destabilize a large part of the library but also because there is no
clear advantage in doing that, not only for the majority of LLVM users but
also in the context of its goals.
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
2009 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] please stabilize the trunk
On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:52 AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote:
> We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang)
> recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly.
>
> I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization
> day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four
> hours. We would like for
2009 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] Parametric polymorphism
> It's done by the front-end. There are a variety of attributes and
> mechanisms which are used to convolute data and marshall it through
> call sites in an ABI-conformant manner.
Oh dear. :-( Do the attributes change depending on the type?
I would assume that attributes like "ccc" are type-invariant; i.e.
every instantiation should use the C-calling convention, whatever
2010 Jan 15
2
optional package dependency
...Rmpi
</quote>
Rmpi is not required, but I gather from previous discussion on this list
that suggests basically means required for R CMD check.
NAMESPACE seems to raise similar issues; I don't see any mechanism for
optional imports. Also, I have not used namespaces, and am not eager to
destabilize things so close to release. At least, I hope I'm close to
release :)
Thanks for any advice.
Ross Boylan
P.S. Thanks, Duncan, for your recent advice on my help format problem
with R 2.7. I removed the nested \description, and now things look OK.
2011 Dec 03
3
Puppet considered harmful?
I am considering installing a Puppet agent on a legacy server running
an old, crappy, slow, leaky, yet important Java app. Nervous about
introducing anything that might (further) destabilize the app. What
are people''s experiences with Puppet in terms of resource usage (CPU/
memory/network/etc)? For starters will likely run it on the standard
daemon schedule. Ultimately may want to control it with MCollective
though.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to...
2005 Jan 13
3
Problem encoding sine wave in 1.1.6 and somewhat in 1.0.4
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 12:42 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 janvier 2005 ? 10:59 -0500, Jared Whitby a ?crit :
> > Interestingly enough.. I started playing around with preprocessing
> > options in 1.1.6 and happened upon the denoise filter
> > (SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE). When i run the test tone using that
> > option it is completely filtered out and I
2005 Nov 16
1
[LLVMdev] Moving CVS Files
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Reid Spencer wrote:
> We should probably review this decision at least once a year. If the basis
> for not moving to svn is that "cvs is the standard", that situation is likely
> to change. Many organizations are now using svn. It is rapidly becoming "the
> new standard". At some point it doesn't make sense for us to continue with
>
2009 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] Parametric polymorphism
...ons be
>>> performed?
>>
>> They could but my impression is that this will only ever be an academic
>> exercise: I doubt LLVM's type system will ever be changed in such a
>> fundamental way simply because the back-end is reaching maturity and that
>> would destabilize a large part of the library but also because there is no
>> clear advantage in doing that, not only for the majority of LLVM users but
>> also in the context of its goals.
>
> The majority of llvm users are using llvm to compile C, or things that are
> similar to C. People who...
2012 Dec 12
20
Solaris 11 System Reboots Continuously Because of a ZFS-Related Panic (7191375)
I''ve hit this bug on four of my Solaris 11 servers. Looking for anyone else
who has seen it, as well as comments/speculation on cause.
This bug is pretty bad. If you are lucky you can import the pool read-only
and migrate it elsewhere.
I''ve also tried setting zfs:zfs_recover=1,aok=1 with varying results.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E28978/gmkgj.html#scrolltoc
2004 Sep 25
1
Samba 3.1.0 Available for Download
....1 and Samba 4? The answer is that Samba 3.1 is
continuation of the Samba 3.x series in an effort to foster further
development. Team members are still working on Samba 4 and we will
ship that once it is ready.
Samba 3.1.x is just a platform for implementing newer features
that could potentially destabilize the 3.0.x tree (and delay
the necessary bug fix releases). Once features stabilize in
Samba 3.1, they will be considered for back porting to the Samba
3.0 tree. If 3.1.x gets a large number of new features that are
not suitable for back porting to 3.0, then we will create a stable
3.2 series of r...
2004 Sep 25
1
Samba 3.1.0 Available for Download
....1 and Samba 4? The answer is that Samba 3.1 is
continuation of the Samba 3.x series in an effort to foster further
development. Team members are still working on Samba 4 and we will
ship that once it is ready.
Samba 3.1.x is just a platform for implementing newer features
that could potentially destabilize the 3.0.x tree (and delay
the necessary bug fix releases). Once features stabilize in
Samba 3.1, they will be considered for back porting to the Samba
3.0 tree. If 3.1.x gets a large number of new features that are
not suitable for back porting to 3.0, then we will create a stable
3.2 series of r...
2020 Apr 13
2
stringsAsFactors and type.convert()
If read.table() is defaulting to "character" instead of "factor" data type, shouldn't type.convert() also default to "character" in R 4.0.0?
This would seem like a good time to change the default to type.convert(as.is=TRUE), to align it with the new default in read.table and data.frame. I think many R >=4.0.0 users would be happy with as.is=TRUE as the default
2012 Feb 09
3
Include directory in smb.conf
Hi there,
I'm wondering if there any patch or recent developement that would allow to
include a directory rather than a file in smb.conf
Something like
includedir = /etc/samba/shares.d/
instead of
include = /etc/samba/shares.conf
Thanks for your help
Santiago
-------------------------
*Santiago DIEZ*
*Director*
*+33 6 37 90 81 98*
-------------------------
2020 Apr 20
1
stringsAsFactors and type.convert()
...te in any case to fulfill the
criterion of a small trivial bug fix for R 4.0.0 beta (very close
to becoming RC (= "Release Candidate").
Even when type.convert() may not be used much directly (but
rather indirectly via read.table() where there's no problem), we
found it too risky to destabilize the R 4.0.0 prereleases.
As you all know there were ( / are?) still package changes
needed and a few other important "todo"s, so we had to decide to
postpone this (even for R-devel) to after releasing R 4.0.0
coming Friday.
I've committed a change to the help page which does mention...
2010 Jul 22
2
Doveadm protocol for parallel user processing
A lot of doveadm commands process users' mails. They can optionally
process either a single user or multiple users (e.g. -A = all, -u
'*@domain.org'). For example to expunge old mails from everyone's Trash,
you'd use:
doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 30d
The problem is, this doesn't work with the new director way of doing
proxying. Only a single server can
2003 Nov 24
5
SYSLINUX 2.08-pre1 released
Working on fixing lower-priority bugs that I didn't want to risk
destabilizing the 2.07 release for:
Changes in 2.08:
* Add "timeoutcmd" to allow timeout to have a different action
than just pressing Enter.
* Fix bugs in the COMBOOT/COM32 command-line parsing. APPEND
now works with COMBOOT/COM32 images.
2012 Aug 04
2
How can puppet help with change control of /etc
Hi,
I''ve used etckeeper before and it puts the contents of /etc/ into a local
git repository. This means that I can easily see any changes which have
been made to anything in /etc/
However, I need to look after a SLES server - and etckeeper is not
available. Also, I''m looking to upgrade server management to Puppet.
Is there anyway Puppet can be used to manage /etc/ - i.e.
2008 Jul 20
4
v1.1.2 release candidate
...r question, resend it. There are a
couple of tricky mbox issues left, but I'm not sure if I can do anything
about them unless someone can show me how to reproduce the problems.
There are quite a lot of new features in v1.1.2 actually. Most of them
are in plugins so hopefully they shouldn't destabilize anything. Anyway
I tought I'd just in case put out a quick release candidate so at least
a few people could try it. I'll probably make the final v1.1.2 release
in a day or two.
So, please test: http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.1.2-rc.tar.gz
Largest changes since v1.1.1 are:
+ Added full...