search for: destabil

...ialization IR optimizations be >> performed? > > They could but my impression is that this will only ever be an academic > exercise: I doubt LLVM's type system will ever be changed in such a > fundamental way simply because the back-end is reaching maturity and that > would destabilize a large part of the library but also because there is no > clear advantage in doing that, not only for the majority of LLVM users but > also in the context of its goals. The majority of llvm users are using llvm to compile C, or things that are similar to C. People who want to compile so...

We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. Thanks, stuart

...hy couldn't post-specialization IR optimizations be > performed? They could but my impression is that this will only ever be an academic exercise: I doubt LLVM's type system will ever be changed in such a fundamental way simply because the back-end is reaching maturity and that would destabilize a large part of the library but also because there is no clear advantage in doing that, not only for the majority of LLVM users but also in the context of its goals. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

...AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote: > We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) > recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. > > I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization > day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four > hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. OK. I wonder if we might be able to automate the stabilization somewhat. I'm not at all sure this can be done without introducing worse problems that it solves, but here's some d...

> It's done by the front-end. There are a variety of attributes and > mechanisms which are used to convolute data and marshall it through > call sites in an ABI-conformant manner. Oh dear. :-( Do the attributes change depending on the type? I would assume that attributes like "ccc" are type-invariant; i.e. every instantiation should use the C-calling convention, whatever

...Rmpi </quote> Rmpi is not required, but I gather from previous discussion on this list that suggests basically means required for R CMD check. NAMESPACE seems to raise similar issues; I don't see any mechanism for optional imports. Also, I have not used namespaces, and am not eager to destabilize things so close to release. At least, I hope I'm close to release :) Thanks for any advice. Ross Boylan P.S. Thanks, Duncan, for your recent advice on my help format problem with R 2.7. I removed the nested \description, and now things look OK.

I am considering installing a Puppet agent on a legacy server running an old, crappy, slow, leaky, yet important Java app. Nervous about introducing anything that might (further) destabilize the app. What are people''s experiences with Puppet in terms of resource usage (CPU/ memory/network/etc)? For starters will likely run it on the standard daemon schedule. Ultimately may want to control it with MCollective though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed...

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 12:42 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Le jeudi 13 janvier 2005 ? 10:59 -0500, Jared Whitby a ?crit : > > Interestingly enough.. I started playing around with preprocessing > > options in 1.1.6 and happened upon the denoise filter > > (SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE). When i run the test tone using that > > option it is completely filtered out and I

...> compatible and moving to svn could be rolled in under that pretext. I don't see that waiting for a 2.0 release is needed if/when we want to change. Further, I'd be perfectly happy if "2.0" was just "1.9" + ".1"... i.e. I don't see a great need for destabilizing or non-backwards-compatible changes to LLVM. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

...ons be >>> performed? >> >> They could but my impression is that this will only ever be an academic >> exercise: I doubt LLVM's type system will ever be changed in such a >> fundamental way simply because the back-end is reaching maturity and that >> would destabilize a large part of the library but also because there is no >> clear advantage in doing that, not only for the majority of LLVM users but >> also in the context of its goals. > > The majority of llvm users are using llvm to compile C, or things that are > similar to C. People...

I''ve hit this bug on four of my Solaris 11 servers. Looking for anyone else who has seen it, as well as comments/speculation on cause. This bug is pretty bad. If you are lucky you can import the pool read-only and migrate it elsewhere. I''ve also tried setting zfs:zfs_recover=1,aok=1 with varying results. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E28978/gmkgj.html#scrolltoc

....1 and Samba 4? The answer is that Samba 3.1 is continuation of the Samba 3.x series in an effort to foster further development. Team members are still working on Samba 4 and we will ship that once it is ready. Samba 3.1.x is just a platform for implementing newer features that could potentially destabilize the 3.0.x tree (and delay the necessary bug fix releases). Once features stabilize in Samba 3.1, they will be considered for back porting to the Samba 3.0 tree. If 3.1.x gets a large number of new features that are not suitable for back porting to 3.0, then we will create a stable 3.2 series o...

....1 and Samba 4? The answer is that Samba 3.1 is continuation of the Samba 3.x series in an effort to foster further development. Team members are still working on Samba 4 and we will ship that once it is ready. Samba 3.1.x is just a platform for implementing newer features that could potentially destabilize the 3.0.x tree (and delay the necessary bug fix releases). Once features stabilize in Samba 3.1, they will be considered for back porting to the Samba 3.0 tree. If 3.1.x gets a large number of new features that are not suitable for back porting to 3.0, then we will create a stable 3.2 series o...

If read.table() is defaulting to "character" instead of "factor" data type, shouldn't type.convert() also default to "character" in R 4.0.0? This would seem like a good time to change the default to type.convert(as.is=TRUE), to align it with the new default in read.table and data.frame. I think many R >=4.0.0 users would be happy with as.is=TRUE as the default

Hi there, I'm wondering if there any patch or recent developement that would allow to include a directory rather than a file in smb.conf Something like includedir = /etc/samba/shares.d/ instead of include = /etc/samba/shares.conf Thanks for your help Santiago ------------------------- *Santiago DIEZ* *Director* *+33 6 37 90 81 98* -------------------------

...te in any case to fulfill the criterion of a small trivial bug fix for R 4.0.0 beta (very close to becoming RC (= "Release Candidate"). Even when type.convert() may not be used much directly (but rather indirectly via read.table() where there's no problem), we found it too risky to destabilize the R 4.0.0 prereleases. As you all know there were ( / are?) still package changes needed and a few other important "todo"s, so we had to decide to postpone this (even for R-devel) to after releasing R 4.0.0 coming Friday. I've committed a change to the help page which does menti...

...ost again and proxy the mail there for each user separately. This could also be optionally done only when the process UID differs from the destionation user's UID. When? ----- These are too invasive changes to v2.0, so I guess they'll wait until v2.1. Luckily there won't be any hugely destabilizing changes going into v2.1, so maybe v2.1.0 release won't be too many months after v2.0.0. :)

Working on fixing lower-priority bugs that I didn't want to risk destabilizing the 2.07 release for: Changes in 2.08: * Add "timeoutcmd" to allow timeout to have a different action than just pressing Enter. * Fix bugs in the COMBOOT/COM32 command-line parsing. APPEND now works with COMBOOT/COM32 images. ftp://ftp.kerne...

Hi, I''ve used etckeeper before and it puts the contents of /etc/ into a local git repository. This means that I can easily see any changes which have been made to anything in /etc/ However, I need to look after a SLES server - and etckeeper is not available. Also, I''m looking to upgrade server management to Puppet. Is there anyway Puppet can be used to manage /etc/ - i.e.

...r question, resend it. There are a couple of tricky mbox issues left, but I'm not sure if I can do anything about them unless someone can show me how to reproduce the problems. There are quite a lot of new features in v1.1.2 actually. Most of them are in plugins so hopefully they shouldn't destabilize anything. Anyway I tought I'd just in case put out a quick release candidate so at least a few people could try it. I'll probably make the final v1.1.2 release in a day or two. So, please test: http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.1.2-rc.tar.gz Largest changes since v1.1.1 are: + Added f...