Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dest_stat".
Did you mean:
deststat
2017 Aug 28
0
"Improvement with the R code"
...ld check n_states is right at this point
transitions <- matrix(0, n_states, n_states)
#we could improve a little bit here because at step N+1 source is dest
from step N
#but it would not be as readable
for (k in 1:(length(data) - 1)) {
source_state <- data[k]
dest_state <- data[k+1]
transitions[source_state, dest_state] <- transitions[source_state,
dest_state] + 1
}
for (k in 1:n_states)
transitions[k,] <- transitions[k,] / sum(transitions[k,])
transitions
}
checkdf=data.frame(clusterNum=c(3,2,3,1,1,3,4,3,2,1,1,3,2,1,3,2))
n...
2017 Aug 28
5
"Improvement with the R code"
Hello,
I am trying to implement a formula
aij= transition from state S_i to S_j/no of transition at state S_i
Code I have written is working with three state {1,2,3 }, but if the number
of states become={1,2,3,4,......n} then the code will not work, so can some
help me with this.
For and some rows of my data frame look like
2017 Aug 28
0
"Improvement with the R code"
...es)
>>>
>>> #we could improve a little bit here because at step N+1 source is
>>> dest from step N
>>> #but it would not be as readable
>>> for (k in 1:(length(data) - 1)) {
>>> source_state <- data[k]
>>> dest_state <- data[k+1]
>>> transitions[source_state, dest_state] <-
>>> transitions[source_state, dest_state] + 1
>>> }
>>>
>>> for (k in 1:n_states)
>>> transitions[k,] <- transitions[k,] / sum(transitions[k,])
>>&...
2017 Aug 28
0
"Improvement with the R code"
...uld improve a little bit here because at step N+1 source is
>>>>> dest from step N
>>>>> #but it would not be as readable
>>>>> for (k in 1:(length(data) - 1)) {
>>>>> source_state <- data[k]
>>>>> dest_state <- data[k+1]
>>>>> transitions[source_state, dest_state] <-
>>>>> transitions[source_state, dest_state] + 1
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> for (k in 1:n_states)
>>>>> transitions[k,] <-...