search for: design_pag

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "design_pag".

Did you mean: design_pages
2020 Aug 12
6
Using SSSD + AD with Samba seems to require Winbind be running
What i dont get/understand .. Why ? Why such setup. Can TP explain this? Just trying to understand you idea why setup like this.. There must be a reason? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 12 augustus 2020 14:41 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
2019 May 14
1
Samba4 changing a user's password from linux workstation
...avoid leaking data to all domain members. This is an option that could help winbind users if implemented. I remember mentioning it here previously but never created a RFE bug, I didn't get any response so I forgot, my mistake, I should have created it. [1] https://docs.pagure.org/SSSD.sssd/design_pages/auto_private_groups.html > > You do not need either sssd or realmd, just about the only thing that > sssd can do that winbind cannot do, is cache sudo rules, I think you > will find that if you need cached sudo rules, you have much bigger > problems. As for realmd, a bit of ba...
2019 May 14
2
Samba4 changing a user's password from linux workstation
Hello Rowland, We’ve been using SSSD with Acitve Directory for a few years now… It’s been solid for us. Our Linux clients use the AD-Kerberos via SSSD for secure NFS4 mounts with POSIX attributes defined in AD (uidNumber, gidNumber, unixHomeDirectory, loginShell). Before putting into production, I tested using Winbind and could not get it to do what I wanted. If I remember correctly, I had
2019 Jun 12
4
Samba + sssd deployment: success and failure
I agree with putting the sssd discussion to bed, but am still interested in clearing up some confusion, as I'm concerned I might be missing something. On 6/12/19 12:44 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 12/06/2019 17:43, Goetz, Patrick G via samba wrote: >> On 6/12/19 11:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> Why are you using sssd on a standalone server ?