search for: descreased

I've run the function randomForest with importance=T. All my variables (predictors and the dependent variable) are numeric. rf<-randomForest(formula, data=mydata, importance=T, etc.) my results object "rf" contains predictor importances: rf$importance I am seeing two columns: %IncMSE IncNodePurity V1 -0.01683558 58.10910 V2 0.04000299 71.27579 V3 0.01974636

Hi, I've a question about the RandomForest package. The package allows the extraction of a variable importance measure. As far as I could see from the documentation, the computation is based on the Gini index. Do you know if this extraction can be also based on other criteria? In particular, I'm interested in the info gain criterion. Best regards, Chris --

Dear All, I would like to know how to sort a vector of numeric values such that we know the original index of each ordered component. Say, we have c <- c(1,4,3,2) csort <- sort(c,descreasing=FALSE) With a few components of c, we can manually find out: csort[1] = 1 = c[1], ie, the original index of csort[1] is 1, csort[2] =2 =c[4], ie, the original index of csort[2] is 4. When length(c) is

Hello all, This is my first attempt at posting a patch. So if I screw this all up, my apologies and please someone let me know without beating me up too bad. To use this patch. You need to have an extra line in /etc/asterisk/voicemail.conf that looks like volgain=10.0 The 10.0 gets passed to sox which you will need installed on your system. 10.0 is what works for me, anything over 1.0 will

...ba.domain.tld. 1 900 600 86400 3600 ... When yesterday the same request gave the following answer: ... samba.domain.tld. *1715* IN SOA DC1.samba.domain.tld. 62 900 600 86400 3600 ... So I ran several that same command and each the value displayed as second member (here 1715 or 3593) was descreased by the same amount of second as the time between my command launchs. It seems this shown TTL is declared TTL (or minttl) minus the amount of seconds since last renewal of this TTL. No idae why this behaviour. If someone knows, I would be pleased to learn :) Cheers, mathias 2015-11-20 8:44 GMT+0...

Hello, Im a new ubuntu's user. I started using it about 3 days ago. I installed wine with wow, and work's perfectly about 75 fps. Then i've installed D3d9 library, directx10 library, directx9 library, and so many other things to be able to play BFBC2. The first problem was a black screen, i found the solution on internet's webpage. The second problem was resolution, and i found a

...gt; When yesterday the same request gave the following answer: > > ... > samba.domain.tld. *1715* IN SOA DC1.samba.domain.tld. 62 900 600 > 86400 3600 > ... > > So I ran several that same command and each the value displayed as > second member (here 1715 or 3593) was descreased by the same amount of > second as the time between my command launchs. > > It seems this shown TTL is declared TTL (or minttl) minus the amount > of seconds since last renewal of this TTL. No idae why this behaviour. > If someone knows, I would be pleased to learn :) Yes, I thoug...

..... > samba.domain.tld. *1715* IN SOA DC1.samba.domain.tld. > 62 900 600 86400 3600 > ... > > So I ran several that same command and each the value > displayed as second member (here 1715 or 3593) was > descreased by the same amount of second as the time > between my command launchs. > > It seems this shown TTL is declared TTL (or minttl) minus > the amount of seconds since last renewal of this TTL. No > idae why this behaviour. If someone knows,...

...uest gave the following answer: >> >> ... >> samba.domain.tld. *1715* IN SOA DC1.samba.domain.tld. 62 900 600 >> 86400 3600 >> ... >> >> So I ran several that same command and each the value displayed as >> second member (here 1715 or 3593) was descreased by the same amount >> of second as the time between my command launchs. >> >> It seems this shown TTL is declared TTL (or minttl) minus the amount >> of seconds since last renewal of this TTL. No idae why this >> behaviour. If someone knows, I would be pleased to le...

...: >>> >>> ... >>> samba.domain.tld. *1715* IN SOA DC1.samba.domain.tld. 62 900 600 >>> 86400 3600 >>> ... >>> >>> So I ran several that same command and each the value displayed as >>> second member (here 1715 or 3593) was descreased by the same amount of >>> second as the time between my command launchs. >>> >>> It seems this shown TTL is declared TTL (or minttl) minus the amount of >>> seconds since last renewal of this TTL. No idae why this behaviour. If >>> someone knows, I would...

...a.domain.tld. *1715* IN SOA DC1.samba.domain.tld. >> 62 900 600 86400 3600 >> ... >> >> So I ran several that same command and each the value >> displayed as second member (here 1715 or 3593) was >> descreased by the same amount of second as the time >> between my command launchs. >> >> It seems this shown TTL is declared TTL (or minttl) minus >> the amount of seconds since last renewal of this TTL. No >> idae why this behaviou...

Ok, I see. Nevertheless, thank you very much for your effort! I must say that I can't actually believe that no one knows an answer to this problem. It must affect MANY people using Samba DCs. According to all the tests on the wiki, everything is working fine. Then I pull the plug on my first DC and no one can log on. And this time I waited far longer than the suggested "refresh

V; Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message----- From: r-help-request at r-project.org Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:00:06 To: <r-help at r-project.org> Subject: R-help Digest, Vol 67, Issue 31 Send R-help mailing list submissions to r-help at r-project.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help or, via email,