search for: desagree

I don't desagree with your vision, but if the use of CRAM-XXXX has to use plaint text password's on the server there's a dark side, or there's a CRAM-XXX that can use encrypted on server side? There's always the thing that can clients don't support it. I think i'm not wrong with what i said,...

Le 20/06/2019 ? 12:25, @lbutlr via dovecot a ?crit?: > On 20 Jun 2019, at 04:14, Jorge Bastos via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> I don't desagree with your vision, but if the use of CRAM-XXXX has to use >> plaint text password's on the server there's a dark side, or there's a >> CRAM-XXX that can use encrypted on server side? There's always the thing >> that can clients don't support it. > The ?encryp...

On 20 Jun 2019, at 04:14, Jorge Bastos via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > I don't desagree with your vision, but if the use of CRAM-XXXX has to use > plaint text password's on the server there's a dark side, or there's a > CRAM-XXX that can use encrypted on server side? There's always the thing > that can clients don't support it. The ?encrypted? password st...

The params file appears to be simply "sourced" by the firewall script, which means one can put any Bourne shell code into it and it will execute it. This feature isn''t documented, so I''m wondering if it can be documented and thus guaranteed to always work. I''d like to dig out the IP parameters of my interface cards from the ifcfg-eth? files and set shorewall

Hello, The world is not black or white. Yes CRAM-MD5 is old and his successor SCRAM-XXXXXX is not widely available/implemented which is sad. For your need, use TLS and forget about it. Thunderbird is conservative. If you don't configure TLS or TLS is not available, it try to use something that not expose the password. There is plenty of context where TLS is not possible/desirable. And