Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "deriv2".
Did you mean:
derivs
2006 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing (TAKE TWO)
...hmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city
> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ
> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ
> TES...
2006 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
...be /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city
TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ
TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ
TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/...
2006 Nov 14
5
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
LLVMers,
The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/
If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs
for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd
also appreciate any documentation reviews.
Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You
should see one XPASS for
2006 Apr 20
2
nlminb( ) : one compartment open PK model
...log(numerator/(denominator))
pred <- left.hand + right.hand
# defining the distribution of the values
const <- 1/(sqrt(2*pi)*parms[4])
exponent <- (-1/(2*(parms[4]^2)))*(log.conc - pred)^2
likelihood <- const*exp(exponent)
#defining the merit function
-sum(log(likelihood))
}
deriv2
<- deriv( expr = ~ -log(1/(sqrt(2*pi)*S)*exp((-1/(2*(S^2)))*
(log.conc-(log(dose*Ke*Ka/(Cl*(Ka-Ke)))
+log(exp(-Ke*time)-exp(-Ka*time))))^2)),
namevec = c("Ke","Ka","Cl","S"),
function.arg = function(Ke, K...
2006 Nov 18
1
deriv when one term is indexed
...ut I received an error message when I tried to
use confint(). I thought that getting derivatives with deriv might
help but found that deriv does not automatically handle the
indexing of the beta parameter. I modified the output of deriv
from the case when the term beta is not indexed to give:
dd.deriv2 <- function (Blev, beta, gamm, GL)
{
.expr1 <- GL^gamm
.value <- Blev + rep(beta, each = 17) * .expr1
.grad <- array(0, c(length(.value), 5), list(NULL, c("Blev",
"beta.rouge", "beta.vert", "beta.bleu", "gamm" )))...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2 | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/family/family...
2013 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
...0.0
Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-adpcm/telecomm- 0.0006 0.0006 0.0
Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np 0.0006 0.0006 0.0
Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 0.0006 0.0006 0.0
Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 0.0006 0.0006 0.0
Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ 0.0038 0.0038 0.0
Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/fsm/fsm 0.0005 0.0005 0.0
Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/garage/garage 0.0006 0.0006 0.0...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.10 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | 0.0449 10612 0.0375 * 0.0280 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | 0.0627 12864 0.0572 * 0.0426 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.06 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ | 0.1161 16148 0.0763 * 0.0283...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.14 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | 0.0320 8936 0.0360 * 0.0320 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | 0.0640 11524 0.0680 * 0.0520 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ | 0.1000 15492 0.0760 * 0.0320...
2013 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got
chance to list a detailed pass order
for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations.
This is wish-list in our mind:
pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or
just inline tiny func), get rid of
all loop xforms...
post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.10 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | 0.0366 9260 0.0305 * 0.0250 | 0.01 0.01 0.01 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | 0.0487 11440 0.0471 * 0.0352 | 0.01 0.01 0.01 * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ | 0.0858 15384 0.0530 * 0.0249...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | 0.0161 10656 0.0189 * 0.0152 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | 0.0246 12936 0.0518 * 0.0227 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ | 0.0420 16424 0.0352 * 0.0150...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...| - - n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 |
> 0.0600 12928 0.0500 * 0.0600 | 0.01 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.06 | - - n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 |
> 0.0400 14480 0.0700 * 0.0499 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ |
> 0.1000 21900 0.1099 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/
> deriv1 | 0.0600 12928 0.0500
> * 0.0600 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.06 | - - n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/
> deriv2 | 0.0400 14480 0.0700
> * 0.0499 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.07 | - - n/a n/a
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/
> employ | 0.1000 21900 0.1099...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/family/family
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/fsm/fsm
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/garage/garage
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np...
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make