search for: deriv1

...be /MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc > TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city > TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city > TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city > TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 > TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 > TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 > TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 > TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 > TES...

...tu++/kc TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/...

LLVMers, The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/ If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd also appreciate any documentation reviews. Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You should see one XPASS for

...Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/objects/objects | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/life/life | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/simul/simul | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np...

...0.0 Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/securi 0.0007 0.0007 0.0 Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-adpcm/telecomm- 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ 0.0038 0.0038 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/fsm/fsm 0.0005 0.0005 0.0...

...0.01 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | 0.2161 29744 0.0947 * 0.0727 | 0.02 0.01 0.01 * 0.10 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | 0.0449 10612 0.0375 * 0.0280 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | 0.0627 12864 0.0572 * 0.0426...

...0.02 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | 0.1400 24720 0.1120 * 0.0800 | 0.03 0.02 0.02 * 0.14 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | 0.0320 8936 0.0360 * 0.0320 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | 0.0640 11524 0.0680 * 0.0520...

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.01 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | 0.1436 24648 0.0832 * 0.0643 | 0.01 0.01 0.01 * 0.10 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | 0.0366 9260 0.0305 * 0.0250 | 0.01 0.01 0.01 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | 0.0487 11440 0.0471 * 0.0352...

...0.00 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | 0.1095 31020 0.0482 * * | 0.01 0.01 0.01 * * | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 | 0.0161 10656 0.0189 * 0.0152 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | 0.0246 12936 0.0518 * 0.0227...

...| -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city                            | > 0.1199 23708    0.0800      *                0.0699      |    0.01    0.01 >  0.00 *           0.09 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1                        | > 0.0600 12928    0.0500      *                0.0600      |    0.01    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.06 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2                        | > 0.0400 14480    0.0700      *          ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/ > city | 0.1199 23708 0.0800 > * 0.0699 | 0.01 0.01 0.00 * > 0.09 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/ > deriv1 | 0.0600 12928 0.0500 > * 0.0600 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * > 0.06 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/ > deriv2 | 0.0400 14480 0.0700...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

...hmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/family/family MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/fsm/fsm MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/garage...

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make