search for: deritz

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:28:46PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 16:58, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > given a basic Fedora 25 guest, with a virtio-mmio disk added as per the > > guide above... > > > > looking at device '/devices/platform/a003e00.virtio_mmio/virtio3/block/vda': > > KERNEL=="vda" > >

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:28:46PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 16:58, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > given a basic Fedora 25 guest, with a virtio-mmio disk added as per the > > guide above... > > > > looking at device '/devices/platform/a003e00.virtio_mmio/virtio3/block/vda': > > KERNEL=="vda" > >

...b at virtio-mmio, but would need the output of udevadm -a /dev/vda from a virtio-mmio system. [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5500 -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en/Kind Regards Viktor Mihajlovski IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina K?deritz Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: B?blingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

...ditionally seen on x86 systems, but I think we don't want those for platforms other than x86, right? > > Regards, > Daniel > -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en/Kind Regards Viktor Mihajlovski IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina K?deritz Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: B?blingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

...RNELS=="platform" > SUBSYSTEMS=="" > DRIVERS=="" > > > > Regards, > Daniel > -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en/Kind Regards Viktor Mihajlovski IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina K?deritz Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: B?blingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio<n> > >>>> (not predictable), pci-<busid> and virtio-pci-<busid> already. It > >>>> might be a good time now

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio<n> > >>>> (not predictable), pci-<busid> and virtio-pci-<busid> already. It > >>>> might be a good time now

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew J?drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >>>>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >>>>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew J?drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >>>>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >>>>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen