search for: derefer

Hello, I hope this is the right mailing list for troubleshooting. My environment is: -CentOs 6.3 x64 -Samba as PDC -OpenLdap -Bind I followed this very nice tutorial to set-up the environment as PDC: http://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=CentOS_6 <http://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=CentOS_6&p=samba&f=4> &p=samba&f=4 And actually almost everything is

Hi, I'm having an issue trying to make a Windows machine sambaserveroin a Samba domain. Samba is running with LDAP backend (OpenLDAP). When I try to join the domain, Windows says that the machine account does not exist. The machine account, however, is successfully created in the LDAP directory after the join fails. When I try to join again, Windows says that the account already exists.

> That sounds to me to be the same concept that I am calling r-value vs. l-value. Do you agree, or is there some subtlety that I am missing? I've been assuming that the l-value vs r-value distinction is analogous to C++: an l-value can be written to by the debugger, an r-value cannot. A memory location and a register location are both l-values, while implicit locations (stack

Dear r-developers, on January 23rd I reported on this list a dramatic performance loss of R1.8 compared to previous versions. As I did not receive any answer for this important observation, I try again with some more recent results. The slowdown happens when manipulating parts of objects in other environments. This severely impedes Henrik Bengtsons oo extensions and usage of my package ref. It

Hi Harry, sadmin and tadmin are both admin logins. I was trying to domain join with both. sadmin is in ldap The olcdbindex.ldif gave this error SASL/EXTERNAL authentication started SASL username: gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth SASL SSF: 0 modifying entry "olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config" ldap_modify: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) additional

Hi, I have managed to configure Samba+LDAP+smbldap-tools. Everything works fine, except one strange problem is appearing. When I connect with Windows tool UserManagerForDomains or I want to create a share on a Wndows box I can see the users but no groups. With UserManagerForDomains is see following: Users: All the users Groups: none, just description of Replicators Group and the

Hi there! To set up a samba PDC with openLDAP on my openSUSE 10.1 x86_64 I followed this howto: http://en.opensuse.org/Howto_setup_SUSE_10.1_as_Samba_PDC Every service seems to be running now but now I'm stuck. I was able to join a clean Windows XP Pro test machine to my Domain and I'm able to log on as normal LDAP user. The home-share is mounted and even a login script (actually just

Hi Harry, Here are the outputs. I've attached them as logs with this email too. root at sam3dc:/tmp/ldifs-gr# ldapmodify -Y external -H ldapi:/// -f olcdbindex.ldif SASL/EXTERNAL authentication started SASL username: gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth SASL SSF: 0 modifying entry "olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config" root at sam3dc:/tmp/ldifs-gr# service slapd stop

Greetings All. First let me introduce my situation Machine1: Pdc Samba + OpenLDAP(master) Machine2: Bdc Samba + OpenLDAP(slave) LDAP stores Samba and POSIX information for each user. Case1: I login to Machine1 and invoke smbpasswd. I change my passwords (samba and posix without any problem). In next few seconds they get propagated to Machin2 wher I can login with new credentials. ldap log

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Mar 22, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Roman Levenstein <romixlev at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Adrian, >> >> Thanks for a quick reply! >> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>

...ens in the > bug. I haven't figured out the root cause of this, but it's getting > well into the "I have no idea how TTM works" space. However this seems > like a bit of defensive programming -- nouveau_vm_map_sg will pass > node->pages as a list down, which will be dereferenced by > nvc0_vm_map_sg. Perhaps the other arguments should make that > dereferencing not happen, but it definitely was happening here, as you > can see in the bug. > > Ben/Maarten, I'll let you judge whether this check is appropriate, > since like I hope I was able to convey...

...ef that you see happens in the bug. I haven't figured out the root cause of this, but it's getting well into the "I have no idea how TTM works" space. However this seems like a bit of defensive programming -- nouveau_vm_map_sg will pass node->pages as a list down, which will be dereferenced by nvc0_vm_map_sg. Perhaps the other arguments should make that dereferencing not happen, but it definitely was happening here, as you can see in the bug. Ben/Maarten, I'll let you judge whether this check is appropriate, since like I hope I was able to convey above, I'm just not real...

Since my last post, I've fixed the err=49 cases and I all have is err=0 and the same problem. I still cannot connect to domain with the same error. I'm attaching my smb and ldap logs. Thanks in advance, Hakan BAYINDIR -------------- next part -------------- smb_uid=101 smb_mid=2369 smt_wct=2 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0) smb_bcc=0 [2006/03/17 15:17:55, 3]

> Can you elaborate what "direct" means? I'm having trouble understanding what the opposite (a non-exact value) would be. Apologies, "exact" was a misleading/incorrect term. By direct, I mean that the expression computes the value of the variable, as opposed to its memory address, or the value that it points to. Within LLVM, where we don't have DW_OP_reg/DW_OP_breg

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Roman Levenstein via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Mar 22, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Roman Levenstein <romixlev at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Adrian, >>> >>> Thanks for a quick reply!

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13104 Bug ID: 13104 Summary: NULL deref do_server_sender when argc=0 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

...ens in the > bug. I haven't figured out the root cause of this, but it's getting > well into the "I have no idea how TTM works" space. However this seems > like a bit of defensive programming -- nouveau_vm_map_sg will pass > node->pages as a list down, which will be dereferenced by > nvc0_vm_map_sg. Perhaps the other arguments should make that > dereferencing not happen, but it definitely was happening here, as you > can see in the bug. > > Ben/Maarten, I'll let you judge whether this check is appropriate, > since like I hope I was able to convey...

...bug. I haven't figured out the root cause of this, but it's getting > > well into the "I have no idea how TTM works" space. However this seems > > like a bit of defensive programming -- nouveau_vm_map_sg will pass > > node->pages as a list down, which will be dereferenced by > > nvc0_vm_map_sg. Perhaps the other arguments should make that > > dereferencing not happen, but it definitely was happening here, as you > > can see in the bug. > > > > Ben/Maarten, I'll let you judge whether this check is appropriate, > > since li...

...root cause of this, but it's getting >> >>> well into the "I have no idea how TTM works" space. However this seems >> >>> like a bit of defensive programming -- nouveau_vm_map_sg will pass >> >>> node->pages as a list down, which will be dereferenced by >> >>> nvc0_vm_map_sg. Perhaps the other arguments should make that >> >>> dereferencing not happen, but it definitely was happening here, as you >> >>> can see in the bug. >> >>> >> >>> Ben/Maarten, I'll let you...

Hi, I'm trying to use the sambaUserWorkstations option to allow users to log on certain computers only. This option looks great... In fact it looks now a lot better than the 'ldap filter' one than was deprecated with samba 3.0.20... The fact is, if the sambaUserWorkstations option works well with machine names, it doesn't seem to work when specifying groups of machines.