search for: depriorit

I have noticed at the dev.rubyonrails.org site that many tickets with pretty clear-cut bug reports/patches or feature enhancements don''t get any attention. They sit there for months at a time. Why is this? Are tickets from those that are not in rails-core deprioritized? Are there just not enough people that have the power to act on tickets? I know it''s not lack of test cases because I see tickets with test cases attached that are also ignored. It seems like just some sort of response would be helpful, even if it is as simple as "we are not goin...

...change the TOS value of packets sent by certain processes to 0x1E (If anyone known of a better way to mark packets, please tell me. I would love to find some module that adds an IP option with UIDs and GIDs to the packets - does anyone know if such a module already exists?), and I want my router to deprioritize them. I also want to limit my outbound bandwidth to 750kbit overall. So anyway, this is my qdisc setup: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: cbq bandwidth 10mbit \ avpkt 1000 rate 750kbit cell 8 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1: handle 2: prio bands 4 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 2:1 handle 3...

...re fine, and have been fine for 1-year. > (setup has been rock solid....) > > Any idea how to address this? I''d thought puting the > relevant filesystem (tank/vmware) on a higher > priority for reads/writes, but haven''t figured out > how. > Another way is to deprioritize the backup somehow. > > Any pointers would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Tom -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi Andy, Thanks for the explanations. Yes AMDGPU is in-order and has MicroOpBufferSize = 1. Re "issue limited" and instruction groups: could it make sense to disable the generic scheduler's detection of issue limitation on in-order CPUs, or on CPUs that don't define instruction groups, or some similar condition? Something like: --- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp +++